| 查看: 1463 | 回复: 4 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者fromto1566将赠送您 4 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
fromto1566银虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
这种审稿意见还有希望吗？大家帮忙看看 已有1人参与
|
|
|
三个审稿人，两个还可以，其中一个问题比较尖锐，大家出出主意吧。 Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author Review of “Novel Dual Redundancy EHA Research and Controller Design” The paper introduces the electro-hydrostatic actuators (EHA) system with a dual redundancy motor pump. A control method is proposed and applied to the system. In addition, a simulation model is built in the commercial Amesim software to simulate several working conditions. As an overall comment, the paper topic is suitable for the journal, and the control part it is relatively complete. The block diagrams of the motor pump control and the hydraulic cylinder control are given. Based on those block diagrams, a block diagram of the whole system is presented, and the control method is applied on the diagrams. With the simulation model, the function of the control method can be analyzed and compared. The paper, however, should be rejected or a substantial revision should be provided before it can get published. This reviewer believes that the weaknesses are described by the following points: 1. The valve is a significant component in the system, but it is not considered in the block diagrams. The response specifications of the valve may have impact on the whole system. Why this component was neglected? 2. The accumulator is simplified as an anti-cavitation component. What does it mean? More analysis should be performed on this project. The accumulator can not only store energy, but it can also compensate the differential flow rate from asymmetric actuators. This is not clear at all in the paper. 3. What are the advantages of the dual redundancy motor-pump? These are not clear at all in the paper. Why this layout of EHA was choses with respect to the state of the art which has a single motor-pump? Perhaps the authors should take a standard EHA as baseline of comparison. 4. No element is present to divide the flow in the considered circuit, so the motion of the actuators is totally constraint by the speed range of the motor(pump)! The system most likely cannot work in practice at low speed, with the schematic represented. 5. The performance of the system shown in the paper is only the control response, but not the efficiency or the energy flow. For EHAs, efficiency is what most people care about. An energy analysis of the proposed solution should be addressed, or at least a proper reference should be given. Some other details on the typesetting or expression: 1. Equation (15), (16) and (17) seem a bit messy for the typesetting. 2. The working mode in the figure 9 and figure 10 should be clearly defined. 3. Equation (19), (22), (24) and more have some problems. (maybe the format problem) 4. Spelling such as electrohydrostatic -> electro-hydrostatic, anticavitation -> anti-cavitation. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
梦想
已经有8人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
为什么国自然不能直接公布
已经有5人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有4人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有14人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有6人回复
bobvan
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 4827 (副教授)
- 金币: 32517.6
- 散金: 21800
- 红花: 352
- 帖子: 11253
- 在线: 1527.1小时
- 虫号: 2171443
- 注册: 2012-12-07
- 专业: 催化化学
4楼2019-04-05 14:11:58
sha5241sha
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 11 (小学生)
- 金币: 3109.4
- 散金: 1352
- 红花: 30
- 帖子: 1382
- 在线: 197小时
- 虫号: 1810889
- 注册: 2012-05-11
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属材料的微观结构
2楼2019-04-05 10:05:48
mlxmiao
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 46 (小学生)
- 金币: 7174.3
- 散金: 4871
- 红花: 15
- 帖子: 2883
- 在线: 311.8小时
- 虫号: 127413
- 注册: 2005-12-08
- 专业: 园艺学与植物营养学
3楼2019-04-05 13:07:32
5楼2019-04-23 11:16:12
5