24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1644  |  回复: 5
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者andycoy将赠送您 19 个金币

andycoy

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 请教这种审稿意见如何回复?

Expert Systems with Applications退修,主编让修改,但其中有一个审稿专家的意见不好回复。
Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. For your guidance, three reviewers' comments are appended below.  这句话的意思是审稿专家都建议修改?
Reviewer #2:
Short review:
Each of the MADM (multi-attribute decision-making) methods has its normalization technique. The TOPSIS method uses vector normalization, and then after weighting, calculates the relative distance from the ideally best and worst alternatives. The authors use compromise normalization according to M. Zeleny. Therefore, they present not TOPSIS method. Moreover, when compromise values are determined, they again looking for compromise (or relative distance). Thus, they commit an agreement.
Besides, it is easy to show that the entropy method is not a proper means to determine criteria weights as this approach not express the relative importance of criteria as achieving goals of stakeholders. It is right mean to manipulate with stakeholders' opinion about goals importance. For example, if decision-maker knows the properties of the entropy method, he could quickly change criteria weights by adding not important criteria to stakeholder, and show that the added criterion is the most significant to the stakeholder. Moreover, adding alternative or deleting of an alternative significantly could change criteria weights.

我研究的对象是熵权TOPSIS的一些性质,审稿人很了解我研究的方法,对方法本身提出了很有针对性的意见,也指出熵权法不适合确定权重(这样子似乎研究熵权TOPSIS没有意义了),但也没说论文如何修改,行不行。还有Short review这个说法没见过。请教大家这种意见怎么修改回复?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

geavie1

新虫 (职业作家)

2楼2019-03-03 18:54:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

fudingyi1989

木虫 (著名写手)


andycoy(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2019-03-03 22:07:13
short review应该是审稿人就你的研究内容做了总结和归纳,表明他的个人看法和意见,貌似并不赞同你的方法…祝好运

发自小木虫IOS客户端
加油,相信自己!
3楼2019-03-03 19:02:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangzhencsu

金虫 (著名写手)

你的大改了。糊弄一下 回去还是拒

发自小木虫Android客户端
天道酬勤
4楼2019-03-03 19:06:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

球去了

新虫 (初入文坛)

看大意是指出你问题,没说咋改

发自小木虫Android客户端
5楼2019-03-03 19:07:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
6楼2019-03-03 22:42:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 andycoy 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 一志愿山东大学105500药学专硕,总分302求调剂 +5 五维天空 2026-03-04 11/550 2026-03-09 09:51 by 五维天空
[考研] 348求调剂 +3 wyx79618 2026-03-06 6/300 2026-03-09 07:17 by wyx79618
[考研] 一志愿211 材料与化工 280求调剂 +3 Sanity蒋 2026-03-08 3/150 2026-03-09 06:35 by houyaoxu
[考研] 一志愿武理314求调剂 +4 ( ̄~ ̄;) 2026-03-08 5/250 2026-03-08 23:12 by L135790
[考研] 269求调剂 +3 朔朔话 2026-03-08 4/200 2026-03-08 20:39 by 热情沙漠
[考研] 0701-322 求调剂 +3 jiliuxian 2026-03-06 8/400 2026-03-08 19:31 by jiliuxian
[考研] 一志愿天津大学材料与化工275求调剂 10+3 穿只靴子 2026-03-07 14/700 2026-03-08 19:18 by yuji4268
[考研] 347求调剂 +4 浮云满足 2026-03-07 4/200 2026-03-08 16:46 by 星空星月
[考研] 083000,总分284,求调剂 +5 徐yr 2026-03-04 5/250 2026-03-08 11:45 by 151314
[考研] 085600材料与化工,一志愿广州985,求调剂 +12 qqyyaill 2026-03-05 12/600 2026-03-07 22:41 by Leeding1356
[考研] 一志愿郑大071000分数282求调剂 +3 研研颜 2026-03-05 7/350 2026-03-07 22:33 by 帆船哥
[考研] 考研一志愿长安大学材料与化工309分请求调剂 +4 dtdxzxx 2026-03-06 6/300 2026-03-07 22:03 by 星空星月
[考研] 一志愿哈尔滨工业大学0856材料与化工,前三科206,总分283,求调剂 +7 26考研求调剂 2026-03-06 7/350 2026-03-07 14:49 by Miko19
[考研] 275求调剂 +4 大爆炸难民 2026-03-06 5/250 2026-03-06 09:21 by guoweigw
[考博] 26申博-目前4篇SCI一作 +4 chen_2024 2026-03-02 4/200 2026-03-05 22:59 by sicilyl0001
[考研] 282求调剂 +7 夕~日 2026-03-05 8/400 2026-03-05 21:31 by zzpnuli111
[考研] 274求调剂 +9 一个学习者 2026-03-04 9/450 2026-03-05 20:56 by 黑衣馒头人
[考研] 085601 材料工程 320 +6 和乐瑶 2026-03-03 6/300 2026-03-04 16:01 by chixmc
[考研] 291求调剂 +3 咕噜咕噜123123 2026-03-02 4/200 2026-03-04 08:39 by 每天只摆一小会
[考研] 291求调剂 +3 MuoLuo1312 2026-03-02 6/300 2026-03-03 12:13 by 热情沙漠
信息提示
请填处理意见