| ²é¿´: 1882 | »Ø¸´: 5 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õßandycoy½«ÔùËÍÄú 19 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
andycoyľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Çë½ÌÕâÖÖÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÈçºÎ»Ø¸´£¿
|
|
|
Expert Systems with ApplicationsÍËÐÞ£¬Ö÷±àÈÃÐ޸쬵«ÆäÖÐÓÐÒ»¸öÉó¸åר¼ÒµÄÒâ¼û²»ºÃ»Ø¸´¡£ Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. For your guidance, three reviewers' comments are appended below. Õâ¾ä»°µÄÒâ˼ÊÇÉó¸åר¼Ò¶¼½¨ÒéÐ޸ģ¿ Reviewer #2: Short review: Each of the MADM (multi-attribute decision-making) methods has its normalization technique. The TOPSIS method uses vector normalization, and then after weighting, calculates the relative distance from the ideally best and worst alternatives. The authors use compromise normalization according to M. Zeleny. Therefore, they present not TOPSIS method. Moreover, when compromise values are determined, they again looking for compromise (or relative distance). Thus, they commit an agreement. Besides, it is easy to show that the entropy method is not a proper means to determine criteria weights as this approach not express the relative importance of criteria as achieving goals of stakeholders. It is right mean to manipulate with stakeholders' opinion about goals importance. For example, if decision-maker knows the properties of the entropy method, he could quickly change criteria weights by adding not important criteria to stakeholder, and show that the added criterion is the most significant to the stakeholder. Moreover, adding alternative or deleting of an alternative significantly could change criteria weights. ÎÒÑо¿µÄ¶ÔÏóÊÇìØÈ¨TOPSISµÄһЩÐÔÖÊ£¬Éó¸åÈ˺ÜÁ˽âÎÒÑо¿µÄ·½·¨£¬¶Ô·½·¨±¾ÉíÌá³öÁ˺ÜÓÐÕë¶ÔÐÔµÄÒâ¼û£¬Ò²Ö¸³öìØÈ¨·¨²»ÊʺÏÈ·¶¨È¨ÖØ£¨ÕâÑù×ÓËÆºõÑо¿ìØÈ¨TOPSISûÓÐÒâÒåÁË£©£¬µ«Ò²Ã»ËµÂÛÎÄÈçºÎÐ޸ģ¬Ðв»ÐС£»¹ÓÐShort reviewÕâ¸ö˵·¨Ã»¼û¹ý¡£Çë½Ì´ó¼ÒÕâÖÖÒâ¼ûÔõôÐ޸Ļظ´£¿ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÃæÉϺÏ×÷µ¥Î»¸ÇÕÂ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÓжàÉÙÈËÊǽñÌì²éϵͳ֪µÀ½á¹ûµÄ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
Ϊʲô×ÊÖúÊý¸÷´ó¸ßУ¶¼´´Ð¸ߣ¬×Ô¼ºÉêÇëÔõô¾ÍÕâôÄÑ
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
µ¼Ê¦Í²ۣºÎÒÔõô̯ÉÏÁËÕâô¸ö¼«Æ·Ñо¿Éú£¡
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÉêÇëɾ³ý±¾Ìû
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
»ù½ð²»ÖУ¬¹²Ãã
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
¹ú×ÔÈ»ÃæÉϸ´ÅÌ~»¶ÓÌÖÂÛ
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
»ù½ðδÖУ¬ÕâÖÖ´ð¸´ÊÇÄ£°åÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
¿´°åÉÏÕâô¶àÖеģ¬ÓеãÏñ50ÈËȺÀï49¸öÈ˶¼ÊÇÆ×ÓµÄÄÇÖָоõ¡¡
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ôõô¿´Çà»ùÖÐÁËûÓа¡
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÇòÈ¥ÁË
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 52
- Ìû×Ó: 42
- ÔÚÏß: 4.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 14192369
- ×¢²á: 2019-02-17
- רҵ: »á¼ÆÓëÉó¼Æ
5Â¥2019-03-03 19:07:15
geavie1
гæ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 10808.5
- É¢½ð: 255
- ºì»¨: 5
- ɳ·¢: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 4917
- ÔÚÏß: 110.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 8767206
- ×¢²á: 2018-05-16
- רҵ: ½»Í¨¹¤³Ì
2Â¥2019-03-03 18:54:33
fudingyi1989
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 8877.1
- É¢½ð: 1492
- ºì»¨: 7
- Ìû×Ó: 1179
- ÔÚÏß: 101.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1892811
- ×¢²á: 2012-07-14
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: Ò©Îﻯѧ
¡ï
andycoy(liouzhan654´ú·¢): ½ð±Ò+1, ¸Ðл½»Á÷ 2019-03-03 22:07:13
andycoy(liouzhan654´ú·¢): ½ð±Ò+1, ¸Ðл½»Á÷ 2019-03-03 22:07:13
|
short reviewÓ¦¸ÃÊÇÉó¸åÈ˾ÍÄãµÄÑо¿ÄÚÈÝ×öÁË×ܽáºÍ¹éÄÉ£¬±íÃ÷ËûµÄ¸öÈË¿´·¨ºÍÒâ¼û£¬Ã²ËƲ¢²»ÔÞͬÄãµÄ·½·¨¡×£ºÃÔË ·¢×ÔСľ³æIOS¿Í»§¶Ë |

3Â¥2019-03-03 19:02:01
zhangzhencsu
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 21 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 143.5
- É¢½ð: 1101
- ºì»¨: 16
- Ìû×Ó: 1557
- ÔÚÏß: 408.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1520756
- ×¢²á: 2011-12-02
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÍØÆËѧ

4Â¥2019-03-03 19:06:51









»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
