| 查看: 485 | 回复: 0 | |||
robertleaf新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
求助各位大神帮忙看看审稿意见
|
|
The procedure of using different DFT functionals for computing the geometry and the vertical excitations is not justified, despite it has been used in the past. In fact, it could get to improper errors deriving from the inconsistency between the calculations. The sentence "The consequence of computational simulation of the vertical transition energy shows that the computational consequence of the mPW1PW91 method is in well consistent with experimental value." is not justified. For the reasons reported in point 1. I do not believe this is a valid meter to validate the computational approach. Consistency between the evaluation of the geometries and the electronic properties is missing. HOMO and LUMO energy level are not enough to justify the onto-electronic or photophysical mechanisms. Furthermore, most of the time, the LUMO energy is not correct as computed by DFT. The authors should in fact calculate the electron affinity and the ionization potential values and then correct them with medium effects. Reporting the computed absorption spectra as curves instead of vertical lines, it is not justify. Which curve has been used (Gaussian or Lorentzian)? What are the curve parameters? In my opinion, the authors should only report vertical bars. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
英国利物浦大学屠昕和雍雪课题组招收CSC博士生
已经有27人回复
-
北京交通大学王熙教授团队招收2026年入学催化方向博士研究生（还有1个名额）
已经有0人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有78人回复
-
华北电力大学（北京）（第一性原理计算）博士招生——学博，专博各1人
已经有45人回复
-
[电子教材]天津大学物理化学（第七版）上、下册
已经有1人回复
-
阴离子交换膜电解二氧化碳还原
已经有0人回复
-
英国贝尔法斯特女王大学招收 2026 年 CSC/BBSRC phd 机器学习 催化剂设计方向
已经有0人回复
-
法国里昂大学招生CSC 资助博士生
已经有0人回复
-
法国里昂大学接收CSC 资助访问学者
已经有0人回复
-
北京工业大学材料科学与工程学院《院士团队》招收工程专业博士研究生（计算优先）
已经有1人回复