| 查看: 493 | 回复: 0 | ||
robertleaf新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
求助各位大神帮忙看看审稿意见
|
|
The procedure of using different DFT functionals for computing the geometry and the vertical excitations is not justified, despite it has been used in the past. In fact, it could get to improper errors deriving from the inconsistency between the calculations. The sentence "The consequence of computational simulation of the vertical transition energy shows that the computational consequence of the mPW1PW91 method is in well consistent with experimental value." is not justified. For the reasons reported in point 1. I do not believe this is a valid meter to validate the computational approach. Consistency between the evaluation of the geometries and the electronic properties is missing. HOMO and LUMO energy level are not enough to justify the onto-electronic or photophysical mechanisms. Furthermore, most of the time, the LUMO energy is not correct as computed by DFT. The authors should in fact calculate the electron affinity and the ionization potential values and then correct them with medium effects. Reporting the computed absorption spectra as curves instead of vertical lines, it is not justify. Which curve has been used (Gaussian or Lorentzian)? What are the curve parameters? In my opinion, the authors should only report vertical bars. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
福州大学梁宇航副教授招收2026年申核制博士研究生/硕士研究生（理论计算方向）
已经有20人回复
-
深圳理工大学招聘AI4Science与分子模拟方向科研人员
已经有0人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有57人回复
-
海南师范大学2026年博士研究生招收 (在职想提升学历人员可报考) 申请考核制
已经有0人回复
-
锂离子电池循环寿命衰减过快，求机理分析与改进思路
已经有2人回复
-
求博导收留
已经有5人回复
-
CSC & MSCA 博洛尼亚大学能源材料课题组博士/博士后招生｜MSCA经费充足、排名优
已经有0人回复
-
售SC1一区文章，我:4752 5O36,科目齐全
已经有0人回复
-
售SC1一区文章，我:4752 5O36,科目齐全
已经有0人回复
-
德国Karlsruhe Institute of Technology招收电化学储能及联合培养CSC博士
已经有1人回复
-
德国Karlsruhe Institute of Technology招收电化学储能及联合培养CSC博士
已经有0人回复