| 查看: 517 | 回复: 0 | ||
robertleaf新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
求助各位大神帮忙看看审稿意见
|
|
The procedure of using different DFT functionals for computing the geometry and the vertical excitations is not justified, despite it has been used in the past. In fact, it could get to improper errors deriving from the inconsistency between the calculations. The sentence "The consequence of computational simulation of the vertical transition energy shows that the computational consequence of the mPW1PW91 method is in well consistent with experimental value." is not justified. For the reasons reported in point 1. I do not believe this is a valid meter to validate the computational approach. Consistency between the evaluation of the geometries and the electronic properties is missing. HOMO and LUMO energy level are not enough to justify the onto-electronic or photophysical mechanisms. Furthermore, most of the time, the LUMO energy is not correct as computed by DFT. The authors should in fact calculate the electron affinity and the ionization potential values and then correct them with medium effects. Reporting the computed absorption spectra as curves instead of vertical lines, it is not justify. Which curve has been used (Gaussian or Lorentzian)? What are the curve parameters? In my opinion, the authors should only report vertical bars. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
AgI的FT-IR谱图
已经有1人回复
-
阴离子交换膜电解槽电压衰减原因
已经有0人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有189人回复
-
铜的植物缓蚀剂研究
已经有1人回复
-
26年电池方向博士申请
已经有2人回复
-
【急招】 北京工业大学 第二批博士申请-杰青课题组1-2名额，25日截止！！
已经有12人回复
-
1，6-己二胺甲基化合成四甲基己二胺
已经有2人回复
-
大连工业大学杰青/长江团队-生物质材料-储能电池方向招收2026级博士生
已经有21人回复
-
求助电子版书籍《半导体材料计算》
已经有0人回复
-
气相色谱出峰异常求助
已经有1人回复
-
E02 青C
已经有2人回复