24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1146  |  回复: 7
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

40428643

新虫 (初入文坛)


[交流] 2个审稿人意见有点不一致。请大伙给点思路,我应该怎么修改。

大家好,小弟刚投了一个2区sci论文,编辑给大修意见,2个审稿人意见有点不一致。请大伙给点思路,我应该怎么修改。
-Reviewer 1

  - The authors examine the effect on magnetic lens properties of modifying the shape of the corners of the yoke. Not surprisingly, a small improvement is found. However, this result does not justify a full-length paper, a short note would be sufficient. Much of the introduction is very well known and it is not always accurate. Thus Glaser published his bell-shaped field before his book appeared in 1952. One major contribution to lens design is missing, "Practical lens design" by W.D. Riecke, in 'Magnetic Electron Lenses' (P.W. Hawkes, ed., Springer 1982).

I therefore recommend that the authors be encouraged to produce a much shorter paper or a conference abstract, giving only the results of their calculations.

-Reviewer 2
What reviewer suggests to the authors are the following.

This paper deals about an analysis method of magnetically saturated electron lenses without using a commercial software. This is a significant point to be published in Ultramicroscopy.

Historically, analytical methods for design electron lenses are changed to numerical methods, because analytical method cannot treat the magnetically saturated lenses. So that, if the analytical method can treat the magnetically saturated lenses, it can come back. An advantage of the analytical method is free. Simulation software are now commercially available but not free. So that, at present, only the people working on the lens design, can analyze electron lenses and people who have an interest but have no commercial software cannot do analyze electron lenses. So that, it is very useful for usual people who can join a design of electron lens following this paper. However, authors don’t describe about things which are not their original points but necessary things what reader want to do a similar calculation following this paper. This is quite usual thing because Ultramicroscopy is an original Journal.

However, if a reader wants to do make a similar calculation following this paper, he or she must check other papers referenced in this paper about already known things. This must be uninterest work and need a lot of time. So that, reviewer recommends the authors to write all the things necessary for the analysis should be written within this paper. Original things should be written in main pages and already known things in Appendix. Then, reader can do analyze about their lenses only reading your paper without checking some paper or buy a commercial software.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

学习中的赵小萌

木虫 (著名写手)



40428643(金币+1): 谢谢参与
5楼2018-05-31 16:23:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答

匿名

用户注销 (正式写手)


★ ★
40428643(金币+1): 谢谢参与
40428643(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2018-05-31 16:26:42
本帖仅楼主可见
3楼2018-05-31 16:04:21
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

wonderfulll

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)



40428643(金币+1): 谢谢参与
哈哈哈没问题

发自小木虫IOS客户端
6楼2018-05-31 16:24:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
2018-05-31 16:31   回复  
40428643(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
2018-05-31 15:58   回复  
40428643(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫IOS客户端
2018-05-31 16:26   回复  
40428643(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
loyunpo4楼
2018-05-31 16:08   回复  
40428643(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[硕博家园] 哈尔滨工业大学韩晓军教授课题组招收2027年硕士推免生及博士研究生 +3 灯灯灯灯DDDD 2026-09-03 3/150 2026-09-03 21:22 by 科研皮皮猪
[考研] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 YLHlRHNwYkce 2026-09-02 8/400 2026-09-03 20:40 by jyNB2vrbdUpR
[考博] 找导师 +7 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 8/400 2026-09-03 20:15 by yinnelly
[公派出国] 售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +4 ero8OE6tv9cu 2026-09-02 5/250 2026-09-03 20:09 by jyNB2vrbdUpR
[硕博家园] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 ero8OE6tv9cu 2026-09-02 5/250 2026-09-03 16:38 by T0rGB46095mJ
[考研] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急 +3 ero8OE6tv9cu 2026-09-02 10/500 2026-09-03 16:27 by T0rGB46095mJ
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +10 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 14/700 2026-09-03 13:17 by qsd10086
[教师之家] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 YLHlRHNwYkce 2026-09-02 8/400 2026-09-03 12:03 by T0rGB46095mJ
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +8 gdd2018 2026-08-28 13/650 2026-09-03 06:22 by 羽毛枫f
[基金申请] 科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题 +7 瞬息宇宙 2026-09-01 14/700 2026-09-02 17:33 by ma0526
[基金申请] 要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够 +9 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 17/850 2026-09-02 14:04 by anjeeshine
[基金申请] 学科评审组评审是指会评吗? +5 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 5/250 2026-09-02 10:13 by 雨冰共舞
[基金申请] 面上函评意见出来了,像什么等级? 20+4 Tsingking1 2026-08-27 17/850 2026-09-01 19:51 by 超级无敌华子
[论文投稿] 小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写 5+3 l1963982152 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-09-01 09:04 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +7 echo8914667 2026-08-30 8/400 2026-08-31 17:00 by yihongxu
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
信息提示
请填处理意见