| 查看: 3472 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
求助！！！论文被编辑确定为一稿多投（实则不然），该如何处理？已有6人参与
|
|||
|
各位虫友大家好，事情经过是这样的： 2017.9.11 首先一篇长文投至期刊 A（二区 2.32），期刊 A 3天后拒绝，因为字数超限（13000字）。随后将长文理论部分与应用部分拆开，分为 Part I （7000字） 及 Part II （8000字）（两部分除了逻辑是相关的以外，内容没有仍何重复）仍然投至期刊 A。期刊 A 随后将 Part I 理论部分拒绝（可能因为其偏向应用）。 之后将 Part I 论文名字进行相应修改（意思为仅是理论分析）并投至期刊 B（三区 1.72）。经过四个月审稿后得到意见 (2018.1.20)（R1建议小修后接受，R2认为文章贡献不大，需要有实际应用）。按照 R2 的意见，将 Part II 中的应用核心部分及一小部分实验结果作为一个小节（5.4 An application example of …）加入 Part I（整体不超过 1 页，900字左右）。 然后又过了三个月，今天收到邮件说： It is identified by one of the reviewers that you have submitted an almost identical article to [Journal A]. It is considered a dishonesty and serious offence for such a behavior since at the time of submission that you confirmed this paper was only submitted [Journal B] and was not submitted to under review elsewhere. Based on the above, your paper is rejected for publication at EO. Review comments are provided for your reference at the end of this email, nevertheless. 然而两个审稿人的意见都是肯定的，比如： R1: I believe that this paper needs a minor revision and can be considered for publication at [Journal B] after this revision. R2: I am pleased to report that upon the review of the revised version of the article, I can recommend it for publication with some revisions.……Therefore, the paper will be recommended for publication after addressing following items: 但是 R2 提到： It can be inferred from the article that the *** algorithm is the original contribution of this article. If that is correct, the authors need to mention that in the section which summaries the contribution of the paper and comment on the algorithm's performance in comparison to other methods.However, if the algorithm is borrowed from another working/submitted articles, authors may need to identify that and use appropriate citing. 面对编辑的这一番话： It is considered a dishonesty and serious offence for such a behavior since at the time of submission that you confirmed this paper was only submitted [Journal B] and was not submitted to under review elsewhere. 我该如何处理？ 是申诉还是写封邮件给编辑说明情况？ 只希望不要在这篇期刊被列入黑名单了  ，因为还有两篇在这期刊上审着呢 请大家帮帮忙，第一次碰到这种事情，没有仍何经验。在此先谢过大家了！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
又见奇葩学生，可咋办
已经有25人回复
-
民办高校入职后稳定吗？
已经有16人回复
-
Nano-Micro Letters投稿可以用PDF上传吗
已经有3人回复
-
求推荐期刊
已经有4人回复
-
Angew拒稿重投经历大修返回又送审了
已经有5人回复
-
请问什么溶剂能溶解二氧化锰
已经有4人回复
-
蹲一个男朋友
已经有28人回复
-
评审规则突发奇想
已经有24人回复
-
换导师
已经有13人回复
-
来用亲身体会，一起说说年轻老师的辛苦
已经有24人回复
godfatheryxc
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 21 (小学生)
- 金币: 1552
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 452
- 在线: 213.7小时
- 虫号: 2365314
- 注册: 2013-03-21
- 专业: 遥感机理与方法
3楼2018-03-21 21:31:37
2楼2018-03-21 21:18:25
bluestork
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 20 (小学生)
- 金币: 29370.3
- 散金: 40
- 红花: 9
- 帖子: 4935
- 在线: 712.4小时
- 虫号: 1077825
- 注册: 2010-08-19
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 信号理论与信号处理
4楼2018-03-21 21:41:41
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
5楼2018-03-21 22:19:09
20