投递到某期刊，大修后主编的邮件：As you can see, one of the reviewers suggests revisions, but the other reviewer does not recommend publication.
With the reviewers in disagreement, I think it best at this stage to defer a decision, to give you an opportunity to consider these criticisms, undertake any appropriate revision and also, should you not agree with the reviewers, provide brief statements of your reasons. The revised version will be returned to one of the reviewers for re-evaluation. 看到此邮件真是泪崩。一审4个审稿人，二审后3个没有意见了，一个还是有意见，提了4个跟文章创新点无关的问题，无法正面回复，对于这种不能正面回复，侧面解释还有救吗？求大神支招 |
回复此楼
+2/996
