| 查看: 793 | 回复: 2 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看 | ||
xmszkx铁虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
一个审稿人的意见,啥意思?
|
|
|
Reviewer #5: The authors deserve appreciation for the work carried out. However there are many corrections that are indicated in the attached file. Also, there is repetition about the test specimens. The following clarification is required to be answered by the authors: What was the reason for A3 to show more effective stress compared to A1 which was not pre-loaded. But usually pre-loading may reduce the load carrying capacity. Also, there is repetition about the test specimens.啥意思?是说我做的试件重复? |
» 猜你喜欢
评审感受-评审感受-评审感受
已经有6人回复
现在不知道怎么办,感觉很痛苦
已经有5人回复
导师各种操作恶心咋办
已经有9人回复
生物学博士
已经有6人回复
窗边初夏的小雨
已经有8人回复
护理论文 晋升
已经有3人回复
2026年申博-电池方向
已经有11人回复
26年申博自荐-计算机视觉
已经有4人回复
2026博士申请求助
已经有5人回复
研究生做的很差,你们会让毕业吗?
已经有11人回复
2楼2017-07-21 11:27:48
武汉一心一译
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 502
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2283.1
- 散金: 5914
- 红花: 32
- 帖子: 1665
- 在线: 321.9小时
- 虫号: 3587652
- 注册: 2014-12-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子合成化学
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
xmszkx(fjtony163代发): 金币+10, 代发 2017-08-24 08:38:22
fjtony163: 翻译EPI+1, 代发 2017-08-24 08:38:38
xmszkx(fjtony163代发): 金币+10, 代发 2017-08-24 08:38:22
fjtony163: 翻译EPI+1, 代发 2017-08-24 08:38:38
|
Reviewer #5: The authors deserve appreciation for the work carried out. However there are many corrections that are indicated in the attached file. Also, there is repetition about the test specimens. 审稿人5:本文还是不做的,值得赞赏。然而还是有许多需要修改,请见附件。 另外,试件测试(specimens test)有一些重复。 The following clarification is required to be answered by the authors: What was the reason for A3 to show more effective stress compared to A1 which was not pre-loaded. But usually pre-loading may reduce the load carrying capacity. 作者需要解释一下分类问题: 比起A1,虽然A1没有预先加载,为什么A3有更强的有效应力?因为通常情况下?预先加载应该是降低负荷能力才对啊? |
3楼2017-07-23 10:35:13












回复此楼