| 查看: 756 | 回复: 2 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看 | ||
xmszkx铁虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
一个审稿人的意见,啥意思?
|
|
|
Reviewer #5: The authors deserve appreciation for the work carried out. However there are many corrections that are indicated in the attached file. Also, there is repetition about the test specimens. The following clarification is required to be answered by the authors: What was the reason for A3 to show more effective stress compared to A1 which was not pre-loaded. But usually pre-loading may reduce the load carrying capacity. Also, there is repetition about the test specimens.啥意思?是说我做的试件重复? |
» 猜你喜欢
面上项目申报
已经有3人回复
有时候真觉得大城市人没有县城人甚至个体户幸福
已经有5人回复
酰胺脱乙酰基
已经有9人回复
CSC & MSCA 博洛尼亚大学能源材料课题组博士/博士后招生|MSCA经费充足、排名优
已经有5人回复
有70后还继续奋斗在职场上的吗?
已经有6人回复
博士延得我,科研能力直往上蹿
已经有7人回复
退学或坚持读
已经有27人回复
面上基金申报没有其他的参与者成吗
已经有5人回复
遇见不省心的家人很难过
已经有22人回复
2楼2017-07-21 11:27:48
武汉一心一译
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 502
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2283.1
- 散金: 5914
- 红花: 32
- 帖子: 1665
- 在线: 321.9小时
- 虫号: 3587652
- 注册: 2014-12-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子合成化学
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
xmszkx(fjtony163代发): 金币+10, 代发 2017-08-24 08:38:22
fjtony163: 翻译EPI+1, 代发 2017-08-24 08:38:38
xmszkx(fjtony163代发): 金币+10, 代发 2017-08-24 08:38:22
fjtony163: 翻译EPI+1, 代发 2017-08-24 08:38:38
|
Reviewer #5: The authors deserve appreciation for the work carried out. However there are many corrections that are indicated in the attached file. Also, there is repetition about the test specimens. 审稿人5:本文还是不做的,值得赞赏。然而还是有许多需要修改,请见附件。 另外,试件测试(specimens test)有一些重复。 The following clarification is required to be answered by the authors: What was the reason for A3 to show more effective stress compared to A1 which was not pre-loaded. But usually pre-loading may reduce the load carrying capacity. 作者需要解释一下分类问题: 比起A1,虽然A1没有预先加载,为什么A3有更强的有效应力?因为通常情况下?预先加载应该是降低负荷能力才对啊? |
3楼2017-07-23 10:35:13













回复此楼