24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 736  |  回复: 2
本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看

xmszkx

铁虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 一个审稿人的意见,啥意思?

Reviewer #5: The authors deserve appreciation for the work carried out. However there are many corrections that are indicated in the attached file. Also, there is repetition about the test specimens.

The following clarification is required to be answered by the authors:
What was the reason for A3 to show more effective stress compared to A1 which was not pre-loaded.  But usually pre-loading may reduce the load carrying capacity.

  Also, there is repetition about the test specimens.啥意思?是说我做的试件重复?
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mandelaing

新虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖


爱与雨下: 金币+1 2017-07-23 12:27:13
是说你对test specimens的描述不够简洁
2楼2017-07-21 11:27:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

武汉一心一译

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)


【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
xmszkx(fjtony163代发): 金币+10, 代发 2017-08-24 08:38:22
fjtony163: 翻译EPI+1, 代发 2017-08-24 08:38:38
Reviewer #5: The authors deserve appreciation for the work carried out. However there are many corrections that are indicated in the attached file. Also, there is repetition about the test specimens.
审稿人5:本文还是不做的,值得赞赏。然而还是有许多需要修改,请见附件。 另外,试件测试(specimens test)有一些重复。

The following clarification is required to be answered by the authors:
What was the reason for A3 to show more effective stress compared to A1 which was not pre-loaded.  
But usually pre-loading may reduce the load carrying capacity.
作者需要解释一下分类问题:
比起A1,虽然A1没有预先加载,为什么A3有更强的有效应力?因为通常情况下?预先加载应该是降低负荷能力才对啊?
3楼2017-07-23 10:35:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 xmszkx 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见