24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 737  |  回复: 2
本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

武汉一心一译

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)


【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
xmszkx(fjtony163代发): 金币+10, 代发 2017-08-24 08:38:22
fjtony163: 翻译EPI+1, 代发 2017-08-24 08:38:38
Reviewer #5: The authors deserve appreciation for the work carried out. However there are many corrections that are indicated in the attached file. Also, there is repetition about the test specimens.
审稿人5:本文还是不做的,值得赞赏。然而还是有许多需要修改,请见附件。 另外,试件测试(specimens test)有一些重复。

The following clarification is required to be answered by the authors:
What was the reason for A3 to show more effective stress compared to A1 which was not pre-loaded.  
But usually pre-loading may reduce the load carrying capacity.
作者需要解释一下分类问题:
比起A1,虽然A1没有预先加载,为什么A3有更强的有效应力?因为通常情况下?预先加载应该是降低负荷能力才对啊?
3楼2017-07-23 10:35:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 xmszkx 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见