| 查看: 791 | 回复: 2 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看 | ||
xmszkx铁虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
一个审稿人的意见,啥意思?
|
|
|
Reviewer #5: The authors deserve appreciation for the work carried out. However there are many corrections that are indicated in the attached file. Also, there is repetition about the test specimens. The following clarification is required to be answered by the authors: What was the reason for A3 to show more effective stress compared to A1 which was not pre-loaded. But usually pre-loading may reduce the load carrying capacity. Also, there is repetition about the test specimens.啥意思?是说我做的试件重复? |
» 猜你喜欢
药学硕士,第一、第二作者已发表6 篇 SCI,药理方向及相关方向2026年/2027年博士申请
已经有6人回复
一篇MDPI论文改变了学习工作和生活
已经有5人回复
26年博士申请自荐-电催化
已经有3人回复
中国地质大学(北京)博士招生补录,数理学院材料科学与工程专业和材料与化工专业
已经有6人回复
收到国自然专家邀请后几年才会有本子送过来评
已经有4人回复
考博
已经有5人回复
26年申博自荐-计算机视觉
已经有4人回复
药化及相关博士的申请
已经有3人回复
2楼2017-07-21 11:27:48
武汉一心一译
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 502
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2283.1
- 散金: 5914
- 红花: 32
- 帖子: 1665
- 在线: 321.9小时
- 虫号: 3587652
- 注册: 2014-12-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子合成化学
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
xmszkx(fjtony163代发): 金币+10, 代发 2017-08-24 08:38:22
fjtony163: 翻译EPI+1, 代发 2017-08-24 08:38:38
xmszkx(fjtony163代发): 金币+10, 代发 2017-08-24 08:38:22
fjtony163: 翻译EPI+1, 代发 2017-08-24 08:38:38
|
Reviewer #5: The authors deserve appreciation for the work carried out. However there are many corrections that are indicated in the attached file. Also, there is repetition about the test specimens. 审稿人5:本文还是不做的,值得赞赏。然而还是有许多需要修改,请见附件。 另外,试件测试(specimens test)有一些重复。 The following clarification is required to be answered by the authors: What was the reason for A3 to show more effective stress compared to A1 which was not pre-loaded. But usually pre-loading may reduce the load carrying capacity. 作者需要解释一下分类问题: 比起A1,虽然A1没有预先加载,为什么A3有更强的有效应力?因为通常情况下?预先加载应该是降低负荷能力才对啊? |
3楼2017-07-23 10:35:13












回复此楼