24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

催化大师

禁虫 (正式写手)

科研先锋

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 1.034
金币: 8881.8
散金: 46
红花: 24
沙发: 1
帖子: 565
在线: 233.5小时
虫号: 468855
注册: 2007-11-28
性别: GG
专业: 催化化学

[交流] 美国化学会J. Phys. Chem. C主编通报中国论文剽窃—希望大家引以为戒！

JPCC主编George C. Schatz的通报文章

Ethical Responsibilities for Authors in The Journal of Physical
Chemistry
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/jp079533l
J. Phys. Chem. C, ASAP Article --1, 10.1021/jp079533l
S1932-7447(07)09533-7
Web Release Date: August 7, 2007

Copyright © 2007 American Chemical Society
Ethical Responsibilities for Authors in The Journal of Physical
Chemistry
作者是来自大庆石油学院的
Hua Fang,* Chun-yang Ma, Tai-li Wan, Mei Zhang, and Wei-hai Shi
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp0672048
目前论文已经撤稿，见不到原文了。

George C. Schatz

Editor-in-Chief

I recently took the step of retracting from the scientific record a
letter published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, an action
that I feel merits comment for the readers of our journal, as it is
emblematic of a type of author misconduct that we as research
professionals must seek to avoid if we are to uphold the integrity of
the scientific literature. The letter in question was a publication by
Fang et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 1065-1070. After publication
of the letter, it was brought to our attention that the paper by Fang
et al., as submitted and subsequently published by the journal after
peer review, included a number of figures that duplicated those
contained within previously published papers by other authors and that
were used without proper attribution or explicit permission from the
copyright holders of record. In particular, material was used from
papers by Yu et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 21667-21671, and from
Park et al., Nat. Mater. 2004, 3, 891-895, without appropriate
citation or acknowledgement by the authors, with the result that our
readers could be misled as to the origin of the data and the
originality of the work as presented in this journal. I judged such
misconduct by the authors to constitute a serious instance of
plagiarism.

Given the severity of this violation by the authors, and in light of
the American Chemical Society's Ethical Guidelines to Publication of
Chemical Research (http://pubs.acs.org/ethics), I took the unusual
step of requesting an editorial retraction. This entailed the
following actions: (1) the full text of the letter was removed from
the J. Phys. Chem. C web site at the ACS and (2) an Addition and
Correction notice was published in the journal (in both the print and
online editions) and linked to the bibliographic record of the
retracted text, in order to notify our readership that the letter was
retracted and should therefore not be relied upon or cited further in
the scientific literature.

Let me point out that the responsibilities of authors on matters of
plagiarism are delineated clearly in the aforementioned ACS Ethical
Guidelines. In particular, item B.9 states that "An author should
identify the source of all information quoted or offered". I regard
violations of this guideline as extremely serious and decisive action,
including appropriate editorial sanctions, will be taken when such
infractions are identified. To do anything less would betray the trust
of the many authors, reviewers, and readers within the scientific
community who work so diligently to uphold the integrity of the
peer-reviewed scholarship that The Journal of Physical Chemistry seeks
to disseminate and archive.

[ Last edited by 催化大师 on 2009-1-13 at 22:03 ]

回复此楼