24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1978  |  回复: 13
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

催化大师

禁虫 (正式写手)

科研先锋

[交流] 美国化学会J. Phys. Chem. C主编通报中国论文剽窃—希望大家引以为戒!

JPCC主编George C. Schatz的通报文章

Ethical Responsibilities for Authors in The Journal of Physical  
Chemistry
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/jp079533l
J. Phys. Chem. C, ASAP Article --1, 10.1021/jp079533l  
S1932-7447(07)09533-7
Web Release Date: August 7, 2007

Copyright © 2007 American Chemical Society
Ethical Responsibilities for Authors in The Journal of Physical  
Chemistry
作者是来自大庆石油学院的
Hua Fang,* Chun-yang Ma, Tai-li Wan, Mei Zhang, and Wei-hai Shi
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp0672048
目前论文已经撤稿,见不到原文了。


George C. Schatz

Editor-in-Chief

I recently took the step of retracting from the scientific record a  
letter published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, an action  
that I feel merits comment for the readers of our journal, as it is  
emblematic of a type of author misconduct that we as research  
professionals must seek to avoid if we are to uphold the integrity of  
the scientific literature. The letter in question was a publication by  
Fang et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 1065-1070. After publication  
of the letter, it was brought to our attention that the paper by Fang  
et al., as submitted and subsequently published by the journal after  
peer review, included a number of figures that duplicated those  
contained within previously published papers by other authors and that  
were used without proper attribution or explicit permission from the  
copyright holders of record. In particular, material was used from  
papers by Yu et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 21667-21671, and from  
Park et al., Nat. Mater. 2004, 3, 891-895, without appropriate  
citation or acknowledgement by the authors, with the result that our  
readers could be misled as to the origin of the data and the  
originality of the work as presented in this journal. I judged such  
misconduct by the authors to constitute a serious instance of  
plagiarism.

Given the severity of this violation by the authors, and in light of  
the American Chemical Society's Ethical Guidelines to Publication of  
Chemical Research (http://pubs.acs.org/ethics), I took the unusual  
step of requesting an editorial retraction. This entailed the  
following actions: (1) the full text of the letter was removed from  
the J. Phys. Chem. C web site at the ACS and (2) an Addition and  
Correction notice was published in the journal (in both the print and  
online editions) and linked to the bibliographic record of the  
retracted text, in order to notify our readership that the letter was  
retracted and should therefore not be relied upon or cited further in  
the scientific literature.

Let me point out that the responsibilities of authors on matters of  
plagiarism are delineated clearly in the aforementioned ACS Ethical  
Guidelines. In particular, item B.9 states that "An author should  
identify the source of all information quoted or offered". I regard  
violations of this guideline as extremely serious and decisive action,  
including appropriate editorial sanctions, will be taken when such  
infractions are identified. To do anything less would betray the trust  
of the many authors, reviewers, and readers within the scientific  
community who work so diligently to uphold the integrity of the  
peer-reviewed scholarship that The Journal of Physical Chemistry seeks  
to disseminate and archive.

[ Last edited by 催化大师 on 2009-1-13 at 22:03 ]
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhuyinhua

铜虫 (正式写手)


大庆石油学院这回投ACS的估计都要被拒!
4楼2009-01-13 23:17:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 14 个回答

化学041

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

小虫虫

学术造假!!
我爱宝宝……
3楼2009-01-13 23:07:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
咳。。。。。。。。。。。
5楼2009-01-14 09:10:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mland

木虫 (著名写手)

新官上任三把火,警示一下有好处
7楼2009-01-14 11:17:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +8 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 12/600 2026-09-03 06:24 by sincosx
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +8 gdd2018 2026-08-28 13/650 2026-09-03 06:22 by 羽毛枫f
[公派出国] 售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 ero8OE6tv9cu 2026-09-02 4/200 2026-09-03 03:14 by rM1TE0WVDIIY
[博后之家] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 ero8OE6tv9cu 2026-09-02 6/300 2026-09-02 23:59 by rM1TE0WVDIIY
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +14 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 15/750 2026-09-02 19:35 by liumei0601
[基金申请] 科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题 +7 瞬息宇宙 2026-09-01 14/700 2026-09-02 17:33 by ma0526
[基金申请] 要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够 +9 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 17/850 2026-09-02 14:04 by anjeeshine
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 10/500 2026-09-02 11:35 by 大不刘6
[基金申请] 学科评审组评审是指会评吗? +5 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 5/250 2026-09-02 10:13 by 雨冰共舞
[基金申请] 面上函评意见出来了,像什么等级? 20+4 Tsingking1 2026-08-27 17/850 2026-09-01 19:51 by 超级无敌华子
[论文投稿] 小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写 5+3 l1963982152 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-09-01 09:04 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +7 echo8914667 2026-08-30 8/400 2026-08-31 17:00 by yihongxu
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
信息提示
请填处理意见