| 查看: 1158 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者宝驴0801将赠送您 5 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
宝驴0801铁虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
投向Progress in organic coating 的文章大修后被拒 已有1人参与
|
|
|
导师想着是审诉下，各位前辈有审诉过吗？有没有模板？非常感谢 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
我就是申请一个面上项目而已，这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧？
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有18人回复
-
国自然评审意见
已经有15人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有13人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有14人回复
-
系统查不到
已经有11人回复
宝驴0801
铁虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 300.2
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 48
- 在线: 15.2小时
- 虫号: 2800762
- 注册: 2013-11-14
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 无机非金属基复合材料
4楼2017-08-27 09:30:18
2楼2017-07-15 21:54:04
晋鹏
版主 (知名作家)
- 应助: 626 (博士)
- 贵宾: 0.096
- 金币: 27592.6
- 散金: 1052
- 红花: 288
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 5663
- 在线: 726.4小时
- 虫号: 1183978
- 注册: 2011-01-05
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生物信息学
- 管辖: 农林
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★
paperhunter: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2017-07-16 00:03:19
paperhunter: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2017-07-16 00:03:19
|
1）稿件被拒，首先要责怪的人是自己；要从自身找原因，要记住审稿人是上帝，一般而言Editor更偏向Reviewers而不是Authors,因为一个好的期刊，要保证质量，就必须要一些严格的审稿人，一般而言审稿人是业内较为知名的人士，或者在相关领域中已作出相当的工作。 2）Appeal时要注意语气，不要动肝火，要尊重他人，审稿意见即使有不对的地方也要说得很委婉；因为Appeal的目的是希望打动Editor，让论文接收增加一线希望。无礼的行为会加速Editor对Appeal的枪决，会和我们的初衷背道而驰。因此我建议，发生这种事情一定要先冷静下来，不可鲁莽行事。好好构思一下，如何回答问题，如何回复Editor对自己有利。 3）处理对审稿意见有歧义的地方，要有理有据，不要用个人的主管观点作为出发点，要引用论文或者其他审稿人正面的意见进行反驳。即使有主观色彩很重的地方，也要说出其中的依据，并恳请主编作出决定并希望主编能给机会，当然如果是对的主编当然会作出有利的判决。 申诉信(Appeal letter) 模板 括号内为注释 Dear Dr. or Prof. XXXX (family name of the Editor or Editor-in-Chief who issued the decision letter), Thank you for your efficient work in processing our manuscript entitled “XXXX (title of the article)” (Manuscript No: XXXX). After we have carefully read the comments from the reviewers, we realize that the major merits of our work were not fully identified or recognized by the reviewers. (If one or more reviewers pointed out the merits of the study, but criticized the language and presentation of the manuscript, then you should state that: After we have carefully read the comments from the reviewers, we realize that the major merits of our work have been identified or recognized by the reviewers. We believe that the major critical issue for our manuscript is the poor preparation of the manuscript, which can be improved by a native speaker or a professional editing company.) Here we would emphasize that the most notable merits of our manuscript include: 1) 2) 3) I had opportunities to talk to Dr. XXX (of XXX University), and Dr. XXX (XXX University), and both of them read the manuscript and encourage me to write to you to ask if you could consider a revised version of the manuscript. (this should be included in the letter only if you have done so. Otherwise, this paragraph is not required.). Point-by-point responses to the reviewers’ comments are enclosed after the letter for your consideration. In addition, this manuscript has been edited and proofread by Medjaden Bioscience Limited. I will be most grateful if you could offer us a second opportunity (or an additional opportunity if the rejected manuscript is already a revised one). Look forward to hearing from you soon, With kind regards, Yours sincerely, XXXX (name of the corresponding author) XXX (title of the corresponding author) Corresponding author We would like to express our sincere thanks to the reviewers for the constructive and positive comments. Replies to Reviewer 1 XXXX (Point by point responses to the comments of reviewer 1). Replies to Reviewer 2 XXXX (Point by point responses to the comments of reviewer 2). . |
3楼2017-07-15 22:16:11
10