| 查看: 3358 | 回复: 8 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者heyunily将赠送您 49 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
求大侠知道，我的论文有必要argue吗？ 已有3人参与
|
|||
|
论文投的SCI 期刊，最终到了中国编辑手里，处理也很快，一个月就回来了修改意见，可是编辑没有给机会，直接拒了，理由是审稿人据稿。 如下： Ref: ************ Title:****************** Journal: Computers Dear Prof. Liu, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Computers. I regret to inform you that reviewers have advised against publishing your manuscript, and we must therefore reject it. Please refer to the comments listed at the end of this letter for details of why I reached this decision. We appreciate your submitting your manuscript to this journal and for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Kind regards, Computers Comments from the editors and reviewers: -Reviewer 1 - This manuscript describes the various components of a System for the prevention in China. Authors have listed this submission as a Research Paper, but it is not clear. This could be under Application Notes. This manuscript has numerous grammatical errors and inclusion of vague and unnecessary words (some are listed under specific comments). Authors have to get this manuscript professionally edited before resubmitting it in this or any other journal. Authors have to include what are the benefits of using this DSS in comparison to how monitoring and control are (or were) carried out in China prior to this system? Include specific examples of how problems were or can be solved/addressed– with and without DSS. Based on the screen shots included in the manuscript, this systems appears to be in Chinese. Is this correct? If researchers from neighboring countries want to use this for monitoring locust swarms moving in and out of their countries, can they search it in English or in any other language? If this is a national application (available only in Chinese), would this manuscript be more suitable for a scientific journal published in China? What locusts are found in China? Include their common and scientific names. Specific comments 下面是一些细节的问题。 求助！！！！！！！！！！！！！  |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
352分-085602-一志愿985
已经有3人回复
-
291求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
330分求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
309求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
0856求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
0703化学
已经有11人回复
-
329求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
321求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
0856材料化工调剂 总分330
已经有12人回复
-
070300化学354求调剂
已经有4人回复
ZBBcrazy
专家顾问 (知名作家)
-
专家经验: +803 - 应助: 1132 (博后)
- 金币: 33126.2
- 散金: 4416
- 红花: 109
- 帖子: 6448
- 在线: 1342.8小时
- 虫号: 1024508
- 注册: 2010-05-21
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属材料表面科学与工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
7楼2016-10-28 15:36:15
tianyisheng
铁虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5035.4
- 散金: 15
- 帖子: 467
- 在线: 78.3小时
- 虫号: 1343858
- 注册: 2011-07-12
- 专业: 生态学
2楼2016-10-27 21:33:19
wangxiaomail
木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 369 (硕士)
- 金币: 58.7
- 散金: 6828
- 红花: 62
- 帖子: 3859
- 在线: 207.5小时
- 虫号: 3635789
- 注册: 2015-01-09
- 专业: 高分子科学
【答案】应助回帖
★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
heyunily(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2016-10-27 21:46:46
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
heyunily(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2016-10-27 21:46:46
|
正如编辑所说，审稿人的确更倾向于拒搞。 如果你非要argue的话，有些期刊主编会找repeal referee来审，但基于审稿人的意见，个人认为不太容易。 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
3楼2016-10-27 21:43:38
4楼2016-10-27 22:53:09
