| 查看: 3613 | 回复: 8 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者heyunily将赠送您 49 个金币 | |||
[求助]
求大侠知道，我的论文有必要argue吗？ 已有3人参与
|
|||
|
论文投的SCI 期刊，最终到了中国编辑手里，处理也很快，一个月就回来了修改意见，可是编辑没有给机会，直接拒了，理由是审稿人据稿。 如下： Ref: ************ Title:****************** Journal: Computers Dear Prof. Liu, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Computers. I regret to inform you that reviewers have advised against publishing your manuscript, and we must therefore reject it. Please refer to the comments listed at the end of this letter for details of why I reached this decision. We appreciate your submitting your manuscript to this journal and for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Kind regards, Computers Comments from the editors and reviewers: -Reviewer 1 - This manuscript describes the various components of a System for the prevention in China. Authors have listed this submission as a Research Paper, but it is not clear. This could be under Application Notes. This manuscript has numerous grammatical errors and inclusion of vague and unnecessary words (some are listed under specific comments). Authors have to get this manuscript professionally edited before resubmitting it in this or any other journal. Authors have to include what are the benefits of using this DSS in comparison to how monitoring and control are (or were) carried out in China prior to this system? Include specific examples of how problems were or can be solved/addressed– with and without DSS. Based on the screen shots included in the manuscript, this systems appears to be in Chinese. Is this correct? If researchers from neighboring countries want to use this for monitoring locust swarms moving in and out of their countries, can they search it in English or in any other language? If this is a national application (available only in Chinese), would this manuscript be more suitable for a scientific journal published in China? What locusts are found in China? Include their common and scientific names. Specific comments 下面是一些细节的问题。 求助！！！！！！！！！！！！！  |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分？
已经有12人回复
-
2019年青年基金涵评意见，大家看看几个A，几个B?
已经有4人回复
-
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有29人回复
-
奇怪，两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有9人回复
-
是这周出结果还是下周出结果？
已经有3人回复
-
小木虫上这么多卖论文的，真有人买论文么？感觉没必要啊
已经有9人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有4人回复
-
帮忙看看fileCode
已经有13人回复
-
为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果
已经有7人回复
-
读博的好处
已经有3人回复
tianyisheng
铁虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5035.4
- 散金: 15
- 帖子: 467
- 在线: 78.3小时
- 虫号: 1343858
- 注册: 2011-07-12
- 专业: 生态学
2楼2016-10-27 21:33:19
wangxiaomail
木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 369 (硕士)
- 金币: 58.7
- 散金: 6828
- 红花: 62
- 帖子: 3859
- 在线: 207.5小时
- 虫号: 3635789
- 注册: 2015-01-09
- 专业: 高分子科学
【答案】应助回帖
★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
heyunily(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2016-10-27 21:46:46
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
heyunily(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2016-10-27 21:46:46
|
正如编辑所说，审稿人的确更倾向于拒搞。 如果你非要argue的话，有些期刊主编会找repeal referee来审，但基于审稿人的意见，个人认为不太容易。 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
3楼2016-10-27 21:43:38
4楼2016-10-27 22:53:09
kmght
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
AP
- 应助: 615 (博士)
- 金币: 8609.7
- 散金: 1233
- 红花: 82
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 5973
- 在线: 854.9小时
- 虫号: 4245445
- 注册: 2015-11-25
- 专业: 生物海洋学与海洋生物资源
【答案】应助回帖
★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2016-10-31 23:29:17
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2016-10-31 23:29:17
|
没必要argue，审稿人倾向拒稿，文章的缺陷也点的很明显。就像审稿人说的那样，不然投中文期刊，不然别整一堆中文的内容发到英文期刊，不利于推行 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
5楼2016-10-28 00:40:35
moqi
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 46 (小学生)
- 金币: 13654.3
- 散金: 35
- 红花: 18
- 帖子: 1970
- 在线: 201.1小时
- 虫号: 2276444
- 注册: 2013-02-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 控制理论与方法
6楼2016-10-28 01:15:03
ZBBcrazy
专家顾问 (知名作家)
-
专家经验: +803 - 应助: 1132 (博后)
- 金币: 33126.2
- 散金: 4416
- 红花: 109
- 帖子: 6448
- 在线: 1342.8小时
- 虫号: 1024508
- 注册: 2010-05-21
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属材料表面科学与工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
7楼2016-10-28 15:36:15
supernova1 
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5377.7
- 散金: 903
- 红花: 111
- 帖子: 3168
- 在线: 1043.7小时
- 虫号: 3709711
- 注册: 2015-03-04
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 几何学
8楼2016-10-28 16:12:01
cedric0127
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 31 (小学生)
- 金币: 4887.7
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 316
- 在线: 425.2小时
- 虫号: 2780233
- 注册: 2013-11-05
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 地理信息系统
9楼2016-10-31 18:51:26
100