24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 3264  |  回复: 8
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者heyunily将赠送您 49 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

heyunily

金虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 求大侠知道,我的论文有必要argue吗?已有3人参与

论文投的SCI 期刊,最终到了中国编辑手里,处理也很快,一个月就回来了修改意见,可是编辑没有给机会,直接拒了,理由是审稿人据稿。

如下:
Ref:  ************
Title:******************
Journal: Computers

Dear Prof. Liu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Computers. I regret to inform you that reviewers have advised against publishing your manuscript, and we must therefore reject it.

Please refer to the comments listed at the end of this letter for details of why I reached this decision.

We appreciate your submitting your manuscript to this journal and for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.

Kind regards,

Computers

Comments from the editors and reviewers:
-Reviewer 1

  -

This manuscript describes the various components of a  System for the prevention in China. Authors have listed this submission as a Research Paper, but it is not clear. This could be under Application Notes.

This manuscript has numerous grammatical errors and inclusion of vague and unnecessary words (some are listed under specific comments).  Authors have to get this manuscript professionally edited before resubmitting it in this or any other journal.

Authors have to include what are the benefits of using this DSS in comparison to how monitoring and control are (or were) carried out in China prior to this system? Include specific examples of how problems were or can be solved/addressed– with and without DSS.

Based on the screen shots included in the manuscript, this systems appears to be in Chinese.  Is this correct?  If researchers from neighboring countries want to use this for monitoring locust swarms moving in and out of their countries, can they search it in English or in any other language?

If this is a national application (available only in Chinese), would this manuscript be more suitable for a scientific journal published in China?
What locusts are found in China?  Include their common and scientific names.

Specific comments
下面是一些细节的问题。
求助!!!!!!!!!!!!!
回复此楼
好好加油!!!!!
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangxiaomail

木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
heyunily(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2016-10-27 21:46:46
正如编辑所说,审稿人的确更倾向于拒搞。
如果你非要argue的话,有些期刊主编会找repeal referee来审,但基于审稿人的意见,个人认为不太容易。

发自小木虫Android客户端
3楼2016-10-27 21:43:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 9 个回答

tianyisheng

铁虫 (正式写手)

2楼2016-10-27 21:33:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

heyunily

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by wangxiaomail at 2016-10-27 21:43:38
正如编辑所说,审稿人的确更倾向于拒搞。
如果你非要argue的话,有些期刊主编会找repeal referee来审,但基于审稿人的意见,个人认为不太容易。

感觉主表很草率
好好加油!!!!!
4楼2016-10-27 22:53:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kmght

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

AP

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2016-10-31 23:29:17
没必要argue,审稿人倾向拒稿,文章的缺陷也点的很明显。就像审稿人说的那样,不然投中文期刊,不然别整一堆中文的内容发到英文期刊,不利于推行

发自小木虫IOS客户端
Practice-makes-perfect
5楼2016-10-28 00:40:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见