| 查看: 1242 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者zhaoyarong将赠送您 4 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
zhaoyarong金虫 (小有名气)
凡事想开点就好了
|
[求助]
审稿模板 已有2人参与
|
||
| 各位，谁有审稿模板呀，老板让我审稿，不知道怎么写， |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有15人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有8人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有12人回复
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345452
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127555
- 在线: 8880.9小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
3楼2016-08-11 23:16:16
FMStation
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 591 (博士)
- 贵宾: 0.03
- 金币: 18723.7
- 红花: 97
- 帖子: 8891
- 在线: 1496.6小时
- 虫号: 2400059
- 注册: 2013-04-04
- 专业: 计算机应用技术
【答案】应助回帖
★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
zhaoyarong(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2016-08-11 20:30:30
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
zhaoyarong(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2016-08-11 20:30:30
|
HOW TO WRITE A REVIEWER REPORT https://journals.jsap.jp/wp-cont ... o_write_rev_rep.pdf How to assess the paper quality • Is the work understandable, correct, and appropriate for the journal? – What are the purpose of and problems to solve in the work? Are they clearly stated? – Is the purpose or goal of the work within the journal’s scope? – Is the work correct and free of obvious errors? – Are the methods and techniques employed appropriate? Is the mathematics correct? • Is the work original and interesting? – Is the work original and does it contain new results that significantly advance the research field, or does it show only incremental advance over prior research results? – Have any parts of the paper already been published or considered for other publication? – Are the results interesting and important to researchers in relevant fields of applied physics? Is this paper likely to be cited in the future? – Is the paper scientifically sound and not misleading? Does it provide sufficient information and in-depth discussion? – Is the presentation complete for a scientific paper? Is there any critical information missing? • Is the presentation satisfactory? – Is the paper well written enough for evaluation of technical content? – Does the title reflect the contents of the paper? – Does the abstract describe the essential information in the work? – Does the introductory section adequately explain the framework and problems of the research? Are the importance and usefulness of this research work clear? – Are sufficient references cited for providing a background to the research? (30 references for JJAP Regular Papers and 20 references for APEX Letters and JJAP Rapid Communications are recommended.) – Is the length and format of the paper appropriate? – Is the conclusion logically supported by the obtained results? – Are the figures and tables easily readable, correct and informative? – Is the English understandable? Is the paper free of typographical and grammatical errors? |
2楼2016-08-11 19:10:02
|
祝福您！ 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
4楼2016-08-12 00:33:47
30