24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者zhaoyarong将赠送您 4 个金币

zhaoyarong

金虫 (小有名气)

凡事想开点就好了

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 25.1
散金: 35
红花: 1
帖子: 249
在线: 46小时
虫号: 1648719
注册: 2012-02-28
性别: MM
专业: 病原真菌学

[求助] 审稿模板已有2人参与

各位，谁有审稿模板呀，老板让我审稿，不知道怎么写，

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

有没有人能给点建议已经有5人回复
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求已经有12人回复
实验室接单子已经有7人回复
全日制（定向）博士已经有5人回复
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法，现在跑or等等看？已经有4人回复
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期已经有4人回复
参与限项已经有3人回复
对氯苯硼酸纯化已经有3人回复
所感已经有4人回复
要不要辞职读博？已经有7人回复

先走必须走的路，然后去走想走的路。

1楼 2016-08-11 19:04:42

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

FMStation

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

应助: 591 (博士)
贵宾: 0.03
金币: 18171.2
红花: 97
帖子: 8891
在线: 1486.8小时
虫号: 2400059
注册: 2013-04-04
专业: 计算机应用技术

【答案】应助回帖

★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
zhaoyarong(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2016-08-11 20:30:30

HOW TO WRITE A REVIEWER REPORT
https://journals.jsap.jp/wp-cont ... o_write_rev_rep.pdf

How to assess the paper quality
• Is the work understandable, correct, and appropriate for the journal?
– What are the purpose of and problems to solve in the work? Are they clearly stated?
– Is the purpose or goal of the work within the journal’s scope?
– Is the work correct and free of obvious errors?
– Are the methods and techniques employed appropriate? Is the mathematics correct?

• Is the work original and interesting?
– Is the work original and does it contain new results that significantly advance the research field, or does it show only incremental advance over prior research results?
– Have any parts of the paper already been published or considered for other publication?
– Are the results interesting and important to researchers in relevant fields of applied physics?
Is this paper likely to be cited in the future?
– Is the paper scientifically sound and not misleading? Does it provide sufficient information
and in-depth discussion?
– Is the presentation complete for a scientific paper? Is there any critical information missing?
• Is the presentation satisfactory?
– Is the paper well written enough for evaluation of technical content?
– Does the title reflect the contents of the paper?
– Does the abstract describe the essential information in the work?
– Does the introductory section adequately explain the framework and problems of the
research? Are the importance and usefulness of this research work clear?
– Are sufficient references cited for providing a background to the research? (30 references
for JJAP Regular Papers and 20 references for APEX Letters and JJAP Rapid
Communications are recommended.)
– Is the length and format of the paper appropriate?
– Is the conclusion logically supported by the obtained results?
– Are the figures and tables easily readable, correct and informative?
– Is the English understandable? Is the paper free of typographical and grammatical errors?