| 查看: 3719 | 回复: 20 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者cxy199212将赠送您 8 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
cxy199212银虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
第一篇文章看不太明白修改意见 求助各位大神 已有3人参与
|
||
|
Dear Dr. The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form. I would appreciate if you could submit your revised paper by Jul 22, 2016. However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers\' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments. If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also: a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments AND/OR b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed To submit your revision, please do the following: 1. Go to: http 2. Enter your login details 3. Click [Author Login] This takes you to the Author Main Menu. 4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision] NOTE: Upon submitting your revised manuscript, please upload the source files for your article. For additional details regarding acceptable file formats, please refer to the Guide for Authors at When submitting your revised paper, we ask that you include the following items: Manuscript and Figure Source Files (mandatory) We cannot accommodate PDF manuscript files for production purposes. We also ask that when submitting your revision you follow the journal formatting guidelines. Figures and tables may be embedded within the source file for the submission as long as they are of sufficient resolution for Production. For any figure that cannot be embedded within the source file (such as *.PSD Photoshop files), the original figure needs to be uploaded separately. Refer to the Guide for Authors for additional information. Highlights (mandatory) Highlights consist of a short collection of bullet points that convey the core findings of the article and should be submitted in a separate file in the online submission system. Please use \'Highlights\' in the file name and include 3 to 5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including spaces, per bullet point). See the following website for more information Graphical Abstract (optional) Graphical Abstracts should summarize the contents of the article in a concise, pictorial form designed to capture the attention of a wide readership online. Refer to the following website for more information: https://www.elsevier.com/graphicalabstracts Please note that this journal offers a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown next to published articles on ScienceDirect If your paper is accepted for publication, you will automatically receive an invitation to create an AudioSlides presentation. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Yours sincerely, David A. Wood, Ph.D. Editor-in-Chief Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering Note: While submitting the revised manuscript, please double check the author names provided in the submission so that authorship related changes are made in the revision stage. If your manuscript is accepted, any authorship change will involve approval from co-authors and respective editor handling the submission and this may cause a significant delay in publishing your manuscript. Reviewers\' comments: Reviewer #1: The manuscript presents an interesting idea. The proposed idea is practically important for fracture studies. * The title should be modified to be more specific/informative. ** The authors should elaborate of their CFD analysis, providing some details. Q- Is 69.3 pixels correct? I think it should be an integer. Reviewer #2: Page 2; Introduction section * Line 13. "Fracture structures scatter in coal mass". This sentence needs more clarification; do you mean fracture structures are scattered or pervasive in the coal mass. Kindly clarify? * Line 17. "…statistical regularity"; I think you mean statistical irregularity * Line 25. The cited reference "Ma et al. (2014)" is not in the references list * Line 60. The cited year of reference "Persoff and Pruess (1988)" showed up at 1995 in the reference list |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有12人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有13人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有15人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
cxy199212
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 355.4
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 101
- 在线: 63.7小时
- 虫号: 4019080
- 注册: 2015-08-12
- 专业: 煤炭地下开采
3楼2016-07-02 13:15:06
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345452
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1423
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127555
- 在线: 8880.9小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
2楼2016-07-02 12:16:22
4楼2016-07-02 13:15:45
cxy199212
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 355.4
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 101
- 在线: 63.7小时
- 虫号: 4019080
- 注册: 2015-08-12
- 专业: 煤炭地下开采
5楼2016-07-02 13:16:42
20