24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3389  |  回复: 20
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者cxy199212将赠送您 8 个金币

cxy199212

银虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 第一篇文章看不太明白修改意见 求助各位大神 已有3人参与

Dear Dr.

The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form.

I would appreciate if you could submit your revised paper by Jul 22, 2016.

However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers\' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript.

Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments.

If you are submitting a revised manuscript, please also:

a) outline each change made (point by point) as raised in the reviewer comments
   
  AND/OR

b) provide a suitable rebuttal to each reviewer comment not addressed


To submit your revision, please do the following:

1. Go to: http
2. Enter your login details

3. Click [Author Login]
This takes you to the Author Main Menu.

4. Click [Submissions Needing Revision]

NOTE: Upon submitting your revised manuscript, please upload the source files for your article. For additional details regarding acceptable file formats, please refer to the Guide for Authors at

When submitting your revised paper, we ask that you include the following items:

Manuscript and Figure Source Files (mandatory)

We cannot accommodate PDF manuscript files for production purposes. We also ask that when submitting your revision you follow the journal formatting guidelines.  Figures and tables may be embedded within the source file for the submission as long as they are of sufficient resolution for Production. For any figure that cannot be embedded within the source file (such as *.PSD Photoshop files), the original figure needs to be uploaded separately. Refer to the Guide for Authors for additional information.


Highlights (mandatory)

Highlights consist of a short collection of bullet points that convey the core findings of the article and should be submitted in a separate file in the online submission system. Please use \'Highlights\' in the file name and include 3 to 5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including spaces, per bullet point). See the following website for more information


Graphical Abstract (optional)

Graphical Abstracts should summarize the contents of the article in a concise, pictorial form designed to capture the attention of a wide readership online. Refer to the following website for more information: https://www.elsevier.com/graphicalabstracts

Please note that this journal offers a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown next to published articles on ScienceDirect  If your paper is accepted for publication, you will automatically receive an invitation to create an AudioSlides presentation.

I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Yours sincerely,

David A. Wood, Ph.D.
Editor-in-Chief
Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering

Note: While submitting the revised manuscript, please double check the author names provided in the submission so that authorship related changes are made in the revision stage. If your manuscript is accepted, any authorship change will involve approval from co-authors and respective editor handling the submission and this may cause a significant delay in publishing your manuscript.

Reviewers\' comments:

Reviewer #1: The manuscript presents an interesting idea. The proposed idea is practically important for fracture studies.

* The title should be modified to be more specific/informative.
** The authors should elaborate of their CFD analysis, providing some details.
Q- Is 69.3 pixels correct? I think it should be an integer.

Reviewer #2: Page 2; Introduction section
*        Line 13. "Fracture structures scatter in coal mass". This sentence needs more clarification; do you mean fracture structures are scattered or pervasive in the coal mass. Kindly clarify?
*        Line 17. "…statistical regularity"; I think you mean statistical irregularity
*        Line 25. The cited  reference "Ma et al. (2014)" is not in the references list
*        Line 60. The cited year of reference "Persoff and Pruess (1988)" showed up at 1995 in the reference list
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
楼主看不懂的是哪部分的内容?是编辑部的意见还是审稿人的意见?
咱也是有组织的人了...
2楼2016-07-02 12:16:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

cxy199212

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by paperhunter at 2016-07-02 12:16:22
楼主看不懂的是哪部分的内容?是编辑部的意见还是审稿人的意见?

编辑部

发自小木虫IOS客户端
3楼2016-07-02 13:15:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Ashton91

铜虫 (正式写手)

祝福楼主,看来问题不大,中的几率很高。
4楼2016-07-02 13:15:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cxy199212

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by cxy199212 at 2016-07-02 13:15:06
编辑部
...

而且感觉审稿人给的意见都是些无关痛痒的,第一篇文章。感觉心里有些发毛

发自小木虫IOS客户端
5楼2016-07-02 13:16:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cxy199212

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by Ashton91 at 2016-07-02 13:15:45
祝福楼主,看来问题不大,中的几率很高。

真的么谢谢

发自小木虫IOS客户端
6楼2016-07-02 13:17:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cloudstrifer

木虫 (著名写手)

审稿意见比较正面 中的几率较高 好好按照审稿意见进行修改 问题不大

发自小木虫IOS客户端
7楼2016-07-02 14:51:03
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cxy199212

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by cloudstrifer at 2016-07-02 14:51:03
审稿意见比较正面 中的几率较高 好好按照审稿意见进行修改 问题不大

好的谢谢

发自小木虫IOS客户端
8楼2016-07-02 16:37:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by cxy199212 at 2016-07-02 13:15:06
编辑部
...

编辑部要求上传创新点(必须的),图片摘要(可选)。文章接收后还会收到邀请写AudioSlides presentation(可以不写)。
咱也是有组织的人了...
9楼2016-07-02 18:57:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cxy199212

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by paperhunter at 2016-07-02 18:57:05
编辑部要求上传创新点(必须的),图片摘要(可选)。文章接收后还会收到邀请写AudioSlides presentation(可以不写)。...

谢谢

发自小木虫IOS客户端
10楼2016-07-02 20:27:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 cxy199212 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见