| 查看: 1267 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
这个审稿意见是什么呀？重新提交吗？ 已有4人参与
|
|||
|
I have now received reviews of the above paper and these lead me to recommend that revision according to all the reviewers' comments is necessary. However, I do think that the reviews are very constructive and will assist you in improving the paper. I encourage you to re-submit a revised manuscript, but please explain in a covering letter how you have attended to the reviewers' comments. Please upload into EES a separate file containing your response to all the reviewers' comments. Please note that failure to address any comment in the covering letter will require subsequent explanation from the authors and inevitably result in delaying the reviewing process. I would appreciate if you also upload into EES a separate copy of the revised manuscript indicating where changes have been made in the form of an electronic version showing track changes. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
基金不中，共勉
已经有8人回复
-
基金未中，这种答复是模板吗？
已经有5人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有5人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有17人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有5人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有5人回复
-
梦想
已经有3人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有3人回复
-
看板上这么多中的，有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉……
已经有5人回复
-
为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜？
已经有11人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- SCI投稿过程总结、投稿状态解析、拒稿后对策及接受后期相关问答
已经有142人回复
- plose one 投稿注意事项
已经有20人回复
- 【转载】科学上的不正当行为（剧本）
已经有3人回复
5楼2016-05-18 16:14:31
2楼2016-05-17 07:51:24
3楼2016-05-17 08:02:09
chere279
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 105 (高中生)
- 金币: 1544.8
- 散金: 95
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 728
- 在线: 236.8小时
- 虫号: 1163974
- 注册: 2010-12-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电化学分析
4楼2016-05-17 08:22:12
投票:
