| 查看: 1198 | 回复: 5 | |||
[交流]
这个审稿意见是什么呀？重新提交吗？ 已有4人参与
|
|
I have now received reviews of the above paper and these lead me to recommend that revision according to all the reviewers' comments is necessary. However, I do think that the reviews are very constructive and will assist you in improving the paper. I encourage you to re-submit a revised manuscript, but please explain in a covering letter how you have attended to the reviewers' comments. Please upload into EES a separate file containing your response to all the reviewers' comments. Please note that failure to address any comment in the covering letter will require subsequent explanation from the authors and inevitably result in delaying the reviewing process. I would appreciate if you also upload into EES a separate copy of the revised manuscript indicating where changes have been made in the form of an electronic version showing track changes. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
微信指数没变化，科研之友没阅读
已经有18人回复
-
基础研究怎么拉横向，学校到款任务越来越多，难以完成 拉横向，都有哪些途径啊
已经有8人回复
-
HXDI做水性聚氨酯乳液，是不是特别容易出渣
已经有3人回复
-
小木虫看见有人已经知道结果了
已经有19人回复
-
2026年国自然面上资助率
已经有8人回复
-
系统今天又提示维护了，估计离放榜不远了
已经有15人回复
-
申请2027年材料/化学类博士
已经有5人回复
-
你们的时间戳变了吗
已经有4人回复
-
今年的WR进展到哪一步了？
已经有9人回复
-
产物和副产物价值比较
已经有5人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- SCI投稿过程总结、投稿状态解析、拒稿后对策及接受后期相关问答
已经有142人回复
- plose one 投稿注意事项
已经有20人回复
- 【转载】科学上的不正当行为（剧本）
已经有3人回复
2楼2016-05-17 07:51:24
3楼2016-05-17 08:02:09
chere279
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 105 (高中生)
- 金币: 1544.8
- 散金: 95
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 728
- 在线: 236.8小时
- 虫号: 1163974
- 注册: 2010-12-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电化学分析
4楼2016-05-17 08:22:12
5楼2016-05-18 16:14:31
6楼2016-05-18 16:18:30