| 查看: 1125 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
这个审稿意见是什么呀？重新提交吗？ 已有4人参与
|
|||
|
I have now received reviews of the above paper and these lead me to recommend that revision according to all the reviewers' comments is necessary. However, I do think that the reviews are very constructive and will assist you in improving the paper. I encourage you to re-submit a revised manuscript, but please explain in a covering letter how you have attended to the reviewers' comments. Please upload into EES a separate file containing your response to all the reviewers' comments. Please note that failure to address any comment in the covering letter will require subsequent explanation from the authors and inevitably result in delaying the reviewing process. I would appreciate if you also upload into EES a separate copy of the revised manuscript indicating where changes have been made in the form of an electronic version showing track changes. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
求调剂
已经有14人回复
-
273求调剂
已经有43人回复
-
307求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
327求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
338求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
326分，一志愿沪9，求生物学调剂
已经有3人回复
-
材料科学与工程320求调剂，080500
已经有9人回复
-
0703化学调剂 348分
已经有10人回复
-
一志愿211，0703化学305分求调剂
已经有15人回复
-
284求调剂
已经有14人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- SCI投稿过程总结、投稿状态解析、拒稿后对策及接受后期相关问答
已经有142人回复
- plose one 投稿注意事项
已经有20人回复
- 【转载】科学上的不正当行为（剧本）
已经有3人回复
chere279
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 105 (高中生)
- 金币: 1544.8
- 散金: 95
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 728
- 在线: 236.8小时
- 虫号: 1163974
- 注册: 2010-12-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电化学分析
4楼2016-05-17 08:22:12
2楼2016-05-17 07:51:24
3楼2016-05-17 08:02:09
5楼2016-05-18 16:14:31
