| 查看: 1062 | 回复: 5 | |||
[交流]
这个审稿意见是什么呀？重新提交吗？ 已有4人参与
|
|
I have now received reviews of the above paper and these lead me to recommend that revision according to all the reviewers' comments is necessary. However, I do think that the reviews are very constructive and will assist you in improving the paper. I encourage you to re-submit a revised manuscript, but please explain in a covering letter how you have attended to the reviewers' comments. Please upload into EES a separate file containing your response to all the reviewers' comments. Please note that failure to address any comment in the covering letter will require subsequent explanation from the authors and inevitably result in delaying the reviewing process. I would appreciate if you also upload into EES a separate copy of the revised manuscript indicating where changes have been made in the form of an electronic version showing track changes. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有没有人能给点建议
已经有5人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有12人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有7人回复
-
全日制（定向）博士
已经有5人回复
-
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法，现在跑or等等看？
已经有4人回复
-
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
-
参与限项
已经有3人回复
-
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
-
所感
已经有4人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- SCI投稿过程总结、投稿状态解析、拒稿后对策及接受后期相关问答
已经有142人回复
- plose one 投稿注意事项
已经有20人回复
- 【转载】科学上的不正当行为（剧本）
已经有3人回复
2楼2016-05-17 07:51:24
3楼2016-05-17 08:02:09
chere279
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 105 (高中生)
- 金币: 1544.8
- 散金: 95
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 728
- 在线: 236.8小时
- 虫号: 1163974
- 注册: 2010-12-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电化学分析
4楼2016-05-17 08:22:12
5楼2016-05-18 16:14:31
6楼2016-05-18 16:18:30