,not too bad…三个reviewer 两个都比较积极,有一个把文章批的一无是处……什么结构啦语法啦什么难懂啦……各种挑!我也是无语了!也不知道找的这个审稿人是不对口还是怎么样……主编和副主编都建议大修,然后把research artical改成technical report:method的结构…… 原话是这么说的: I agree with the Associate Editor that the case study is relevant and therefore we may consider your contribution if it is presented as a "Technical report: methods"
请比较懂的虫友们指点一下 research artical 和 report有啥区别?同是sci收录嚒?算是文章嚒??大修比直接拒了强多了。散金币求祝福~