| 查看: 2699 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
IEEE Access这样的初审意见还有戏吗？
|
|||
|
7月11日投稿Access一篇，33天收到初审意见，2个评审专家，都是拒稿鼓励重投，一个审稿人没有意见，另一个说需要对论文进行调整。初审意见如下，各位大神帮忙看看，有没有遇到这种情况？重投还有戏吗？另外，因为没有什么具体的意见，additional questions中审稿人的评价还需要作出回复吗？ I am writing to you in regards to manuscript # Access-2019-26335 entitled "Computational Fault Time Difference Based Fault Location Method for Branched Power Distribution Networks" which you submitted to IEEE Access. In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has not been recommended for publication in IEEE Access. We do encourage you to revise and resubmit your article once you have addressed the concerns and criticisms of the reviewers. I believe they have added good insight on how to further improve your article. IEEE Access has a binary peer review process that does not allow revisions. Therefore, in order to uphold quality to IEEE standards, an article is rejected even if it requires minor edits. Please revise your manuscript based on reviewers’ feedback and resubmit; elaborate on your points and clarify with references, examples, data, etc. If you do not agree with the reviewers’ views, then include your arguments in the updated manuscript. Also, note that if a reviewer suggested references, you should only add ones that will make your article better and more complete. Recommending references to specific publications is not appropriate for reviewers and you should report excessive cases to ieeeaccessEIC@ieee.org. We highly recommend that you review the grammar one more time before resubmitting. IEEE offers a 3rd party service for language polishing, which you may utilize for a fee: https://www.aje.com/c/ieee (use the URL to claim a 10% discount). Please be advised that authors are only permitted to resubmit their article ONCE. If the updated manuscript is determined not to have addressed all of the previous reviewers’ concerns, the article may be rejected and no further resubmissions will be allowed. When resubmitting, please submit as a new manuscript and include the following 3 files: 1) A document containing your response to reviewers from the previous peer review. The “response to reviewers” document (template attached) should have the following regarding each comment: a) Reviewer’s concern, b) your response to the concern, c) your action to remedy the concern. The document should be uploaded with your manuscript files as a “Supplemental File for Review.” 2) Your updated manuscript with all your individual changes highlighted, including grammatical changes (e.g. preferably with the yellow highlight tool within the pdf file). This file should be uploaded with your manuscript files as a “Supplemental File for Review”. 3) A clean copy of the final manuscript (without highlighted changes) should be submitted as the “Formatted (Double Column) Main File – PDF Document Only.” Finally, in your cover letter, please indicate if you would like us to assign your article to the same or different reviewers and we will do our best to accommodate your request. We sincerely hope you will update your manuscript and resubmit soon. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your interest in IEEE Access. Sincerely, Dr. Taha Selim Ustun Associate Editor, IEEE Access tahaselim@yahoo.com Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged) Comments: Without comments Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: A little. Only with the statistical method to select the Travelling Wave Detector and the nearest fault place. Is the paper technically sound?: It presents as a disadvantage the costs associated with the amount of necessary Travelling Wave Detectors as the number of terminals in the power distribution network increases Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: It lacks review on the effect of induction due to atmospheric discharges on the response of the Traveling Wave proposed methods Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged) Comments: The authors should modify the manuscript. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes Is the paper technically sound?: Yes Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes If you have any questions, please contact article administrator: Mr. Nishant Shukla n.shukla@ieee.org |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
普通院校药学硕士，做合成的，感觉找不到工作
已经有17人回复
-
如何分离原料与产品
已经有13人回复
-
LWT投
已经有3人回复
-
真的好想读博！
已经有22人回复
-
博士白读了
已经有49人回复
-
基金开始函评了吗？
已经有16人回复
-
没学上
已经有12人回复
-
研二光催化6月底四篇二区什么水平
已经有15人回复
-
环肽的合成
已经有5人回复
-
学硕专硕
已经有5人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
全国各省市建设工程类专业职称评审要求汇总统计
+1/654
-
European Journal of Haematology论文投稿到接收、见刊的周期
+1/282
-
中科院（北京）土壤生态过程与生态重建研究组特别研究助理（博士后）招聘启事
+1/87
-
长沙瀚辰生物提供带各类反应性基团的Alexa Fluor系列染料
+1/85
-
中科院南京地理与湖泊研究所招收联培生、实习生和聘用人员（长期有效）
+1/83
-
先进复合材料力学与智能制造团队招聘：研究助理教授、博士后、科研助理（长期有效）
+1/80
-
先进复合材料力学与智能制造团队招聘：研究助理教授、博士后、科研助理等（长期有效）
+1/75
-
国科温州研究院 项目聘用有意“二战”的优秀本科毕业生
+1/69
-
东北大学Derek Lovley教授团队招聘教师和招收博士后
+1/59
-
坐标广东，征结婚对象
+1/35
-
招聘高分子材料工程师
+2/22
-
四川大学优青魏强课题组招聘“细胞力学生物学”博士后
+1/19
-
国家杰青、长江学者张卫东教授课题组招收科研助理启事
+1/14
-
【苏州征女友】寻找探索世界的伴侣
+2/11
-
太原理工大学电子信息与光学工程学院本年度拟招聘9人以上，感兴趣的可以联系我咨询！
+1/9
-
深圳大学吴奇院士/李连伟教授团队高分子与食品科学博士后招聘
+1/7
-
清华大学储凌课题组招聘有机化学及化学生物学方向博士后
+1/6
-
海南大学南海国重课题组招收2024年生物学相关专业博士研究生1名
+1/2
-
中科院青岛能源所招聘科研助理
+1/2
-
外资营养保健品头部公司急招销售内勤和商务内勤各一名
+1/1
+1/654
5楼2019-08-14 15:20:57
4楼2019-08-14 15:01:34
12楼2019-08-17 22:31:30
14楼2019-09-04 16:05:40
简单回复
mtw9227楼
2019-08-14 15:37
回复
2019-08-14 20:25
回复
2019-08-14 20:30
回复
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
怡宝~6楼
2019-08-14 15:22
回复
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
韩文珩2楼
2019-08-14 15:01
回复
