| 查看: 2696 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
IEEE Access这样的初审意见还有戏吗？
|
|||
|
7月11日投稿Access一篇，33天收到初审意见，2个评审专家，都是拒稿鼓励重投，一个审稿人没有意见，另一个说需要对论文进行调整。初审意见如下，各位大神帮忙看看，有没有遇到这种情况？重投还有戏吗？另外，因为没有什么具体的意见，additional questions中审稿人的评价还需要作出回复吗？ I am writing to you in regards to manuscript # Access-2019-26335 entitled "Computational Fault Time Difference Based Fault Location Method for Branched Power Distribution Networks" which you submitted to IEEE Access. In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has not been recommended for publication in IEEE Access. We do encourage you to revise and resubmit your article once you have addressed the concerns and criticisms of the reviewers. I believe they have added good insight on how to further improve your article. IEEE Access has a binary peer review process that does not allow revisions. Therefore, in order to uphold quality to IEEE standards, an article is rejected even if it requires minor edits. Please revise your manuscript based on reviewers’ feedback and resubmit; elaborate on your points and clarify with references, examples, data, etc. If you do not agree with the reviewers’ views, then include your arguments in the updated manuscript. Also, note that if a reviewer suggested references, you should only add ones that will make your article better and more complete. Recommending references to specific publications is not appropriate for reviewers and you should report excessive cases to ieeeaccessEIC@ieee.org. We highly recommend that you review the grammar one more time before resubmitting. IEEE offers a 3rd party service for language polishing, which you may utilize for a fee: https://www.aje.com/c/ieee (use the URL to claim a 10% discount). Please be advised that authors are only permitted to resubmit their article ONCE. If the updated manuscript is determined not to have addressed all of the previous reviewers’ concerns, the article may be rejected and no further resubmissions will be allowed. When resubmitting, please submit as a new manuscript and include the following 3 files: 1) A document containing your response to reviewers from the previous peer review. The “response to reviewers” document (template attached) should have the following regarding each comment: a) Reviewer’s concern, b) your response to the concern, c) your action to remedy the concern. The document should be uploaded with your manuscript files as a “Supplemental File for Review.” 2) Your updated manuscript with all your individual changes highlighted, including grammatical changes (e.g. preferably with the yellow highlight tool within the pdf file). This file should be uploaded with your manuscript files as a “Supplemental File for Review”. 3) A clean copy of the final manuscript (without highlighted changes) should be submitted as the “Formatted (Double Column) Main File – PDF Document Only.” Finally, in your cover letter, please indicate if you would like us to assign your article to the same or different reviewers and we will do our best to accommodate your request. We sincerely hope you will update your manuscript and resubmit soon. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your interest in IEEE Access. Sincerely, Dr. Taha Selim Ustun Associate Editor, IEEE Access tahaselim@yahoo.com Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged) Comments: Without comments Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: A little. Only with the statistical method to select the Travelling Wave Detector and the nearest fault place. Is the paper technically sound?: It presents as a disadvantage the costs associated with the amount of necessary Travelling Wave Detectors as the number of terminals in the power distribution network increases Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: It lacks review on the effect of induction due to atmospheric discharges on the response of the Traveling Wave proposed methods Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged) Comments: The authors should modify the manuscript. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes Is the paper technically sound?: Yes Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes If you have any questions, please contact article administrator: Mr. Nishant Shukla n.shukla@ieee.org |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
期末给学生划重点都是什么话术啊
已经有3人回复
-
杭州国企和浙江高校如何选择？
已经有22人回复
-
小孩7岁，上一年级，不自信，学习较差
已经有36人回复
-
想问一下有没有需要文章但是没时间带学生的研究生导师。
已经有19人回复
-
颜宁:基础研究应顶天立地,立地即从需求端作为问题的出发点,立项背景就是面向真实需求
已经有3人回复
-
发现督导在听课，需要跟TA招呼示意吗？有同学看手机、课件有疏漏算大问题吗？
已经有4人回复
-
催稿后秒拒
已经有6人回复
-
前同事拿我以前未中的国自然标书申请今年的国自然，现在基金委发来调查函
已经有10人回复
-
298求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
申请省自然科学基金，研究区能否是省外区域
已经有13人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
福建理工大学模具装备研究团队招生学术性硕士研究生
+3/89
-
招聘涂层方向（热喷涂最佳）博士后/工程师
+1/84
-
西南民族大学化学与环境学院分析或环境化学专业诚聘两名专任教师
+1/38
-
中科院深圳先进技术研究院神经工程中心智能医学诊断与康复方向招收实习生
+1/32
-
瑞典-招聘一名二维材料压力传感器方向博后
+1/16
-
请教各位合成MOF的大佬，DMF在MOF合成中的作用贡献
+1/15
-
同济大学附属上海市肺科医院 肺循环科吴文汇教授诚聘技术员
+1/12
-
Crystals IF=2.7 SCI期刊特刊征稿
+1/11
-
2024年广东省青年优秀科研人才国际培养计划博士后项目-环境材料方向博后招聘
+1/9
-
知名外资仪器公司急招Regional Product Marketing Manager-半导体前道
+1/8
-
GB/T15336-2013
+1/7
-
某知名农化企业招聘一位年薪30+的工艺组长（青岛）
+1/6
-
深圳市龙岗区妇幼保健院招聘博士后-合作老师姚瑶-年薪可达80万元
+1/5
-
研究生需要参加学术会议吗？
+1/3
-
研究生（计算机）或信号方向，还有没有调剂的？
+1/2
-
哈尔滨工业大学（深圳）杨娇老师招收科研助理和2025博士研究生
+1/2
-
知名外资仪器公司急招Regional Product Marketing Manager
+1/2
-
北航自旋芯片与技术全国重点实验室林晓阳教授课题组招聘博士后
+1/2
-
天津大学纳米中心 2024 年工程博士专业学位研究生招生办法
+1/1
-
长春工业大学材料学院材料专业接受调剂，截止17日晚上23点
+1/1
+3/89
4楼2019-08-14 15:01:34
5楼2019-08-14 15:20:57
12楼2019-08-17 22:31:30
14楼2019-09-04 16:05:40
简单回复
mtw9227楼
2019-08-14 15:37
回复
2019-08-14 20:25
回复
2019-08-14 20:30
回复
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
怡宝~6楼
2019-08-14 15:22
回复
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
韩文珩2楼
2019-08-14 15:01
回复
