| 查看: 3862 | 回复: 13 | |||
[交流]
IEEE Access这样的初审意见还有戏吗?
|
|||
|
7月11日投稿Access一篇,33天收到初审意见,2个评审专家,都是拒稿鼓励重投,一个审稿人没有意见,另一个说需要对论文进行调整。初审意见如下,各位大神帮忙看看,有没有遇到这种情况?重投还有戏吗?另外,因为没有什么具体的意见,additional questions中审稿人的评价还需要作出回复吗? I am writing to you in regards to manuscript # Access-2019-26335 entitled "Computational Fault Time Difference Based Fault Location Method for Branched Power Distribution Networks" which you submitted to IEEE Access. In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has not been recommended for publication in IEEE Access. We do encourage you to revise and resubmit your article once you have addressed the concerns and criticisms of the reviewers. I believe they have added good insight on how to further improve your article. IEEE Access has a binary peer review process that does not allow revisions. Therefore, in order to uphold quality to IEEE standards, an article is rejected even if it requires minor edits. Please revise your manuscript based on reviewers’ feedback and resubmit; elaborate on your points and clarify with references, examples, data, etc. If you do not agree with the reviewers’ views, then include your arguments in the updated manuscript. Also, note that if a reviewer suggested references, you should only add ones that will make your article better and more complete. Recommending references to specific publications is not appropriate for reviewers and you should report excessive cases to ieeeaccessEIC@ieee.org. We highly recommend that you review the grammar one more time before resubmitting. IEEE offers a 3rd party service for language polishing, which you may utilize for a fee: https://www.aje.com/c/ieee (use the URL to claim a 10% discount). Please be advised that authors are only permitted to resubmit their article ONCE. If the updated manuscript is determined not to have addressed all of the previous reviewers’ concerns, the article may be rejected and no further resubmissions will be allowed. When resubmitting, please submit as a new manuscript and include the following 3 files: 1) A document containing your response to reviewers from the previous peer review. The “response to reviewers” document (template attached) should have the following regarding each comment: a) Reviewer’s concern, b) your response to the concern, c) your action to remedy the concern. The document should be uploaded with your manuscript files as a “Supplemental File for Review.” 2) Your updated manuscript with all your individual changes highlighted, including grammatical changes (e.g. preferably with the yellow highlight tool within the pdf file). This file should be uploaded with your manuscript files as a “Supplemental File for Review”. 3) A clean copy of the final manuscript (without highlighted changes) should be submitted as the “Formatted (Double Column) Main File – PDF Document Only.” Finally, in your cover letter, please indicate if you would like us to assign your article to the same or different reviewers and we will do our best to accommodate your request. We sincerely hope you will update your manuscript and resubmit soon. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for your interest in IEEE Access. Sincerely, Dr. Taha Selim Ustun Associate Editor, IEEE Access tahaselim@yahoo.com Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged) Comments: Without comments Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: A little. Only with the statistical method to select the Travelling Wave Detector and the nearest fault place. Is the paper technically sound?: It presents as a disadvantage the costs associated with the amount of necessary Travelling Wave Detectors as the number of terminals in the power distribution network increases Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: It lacks review on the effect of induction due to atmospheric discharges on the response of the Traveling Wave proposed methods Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged) Comments: The authors should modify the manuscript. Additional Questions: Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes Is the paper technically sound?: Yes Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes If you have any questions, please contact article administrator: Mr. Nishant Shukla n.shukla@ieee.org |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有22人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有7人回复
售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有11人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有14人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有10人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有10人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有11人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有12人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
东北大学应用经济学博士招生-2027级
+1/980
讨论一下
+1/289
27博士申请
+1/179
大连理工大学化工学院郑跃楠副教授计划招收2027级博士研究生
+1/173
《Smithells Metals Reference Book(斯密瑟斯金属参考手册)》求助电子版
+2/66
南京理工大学国家级青年人才2027年博士招生(多机器人协同控制方向)
+1/40
慢蹲一个与子偕老的爱人
+1/40
脑科学方向带编制讲师 不要求博士后
+1/39
澳门科技大学-纳米医学/生物材料方向博士招生
+1/16
上海知名药企招聘一位知识产权副总监/总监
+1/16
希望投稿论文一切顺利!
+1/14
希望这次基金能中~
+1/13
邀您投稿 Polymers (IF 5.8) 特刊 高性能电池的先进聚合物隔膜
+1/12
对蛋白可溶性表达无计可施了就试试这款可溶性促进剂筛选套装吧
+1/7
2027年 博士研究生 招生,湖南大学 宋国胜
+1/5
中山大学招聘科研助理
+1/5
别把NVivo编码做成贴标签:质性研究的10个核心真相
+1/5
您感兴趣的遗传病是哪些?您认为产前诊断在阻断遗传病传递作用有多大?
+1/4
中国地质大学(北京)赵璐课题组2026级博士招生
+1/3
海南大学-材料学院-国家级人才团队-急招收电池领域的2027年入学的博士生2-3名及博士后
+1/1
4楼2019-08-14 15:01:34
5楼2019-08-14 15:20:57
12楼2019-08-17 22:31:30
14楼2019-09-04 16:05:40
简单回复
韩文珩2楼
2019-08-14 15:01
回复
2019-08-14 15:01
回复
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
怡宝~6楼
2019-08-14 15:22
回复
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
mtw9227楼
2019-08-14 15:37
回复
2019-08-14 20:25
回复
2019-08-14 20:30
回复
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
miaojiabing10楼
2019-08-15 16:18
回复
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
psylhh11楼
2019-08-17 22:14
回复
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zt_geo13楼
2019-09-03 22:45
回复










回复此楼