查看: 650  |  回复: 13

CRHUSTSEEE

新虫 (初入文坛)


[交流] IEEE Access这样的初审意见还有戏吗?

7月11日投稿Access一篇,33天收到初审意见,2个评审专家,都是拒稿鼓励重投,一个审稿人没有意见,另一个说需要对论文进行调整。初审意见如下,各位大神帮忙看看,有没有遇到这种情况?重投还有戏吗?另外,因为没有什么具体的意见,additional questions中审稿人的评价还需要作出回复吗?

I am writing to you in regards to manuscript # Access-2019-26335 entitled "Computational Fault Time Difference Based Fault Location Method for Branched Power Distribution Networks" which you submitted to IEEE Access.

In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has not been recommended for publication in IEEE Access.

We do encourage you to revise and resubmit your article once you have addressed the concerns and criticisms of the reviewers.  I believe they have added good insight on how to further improve your article.  IEEE Access has a binary peer review process that does not allow revisions. Therefore, in order to uphold quality to IEEE standards, an article is rejected even if it requires minor edits.

Please revise your manuscript based on reviewers’ feedback and resubmit; elaborate on your points and clarify with references, examples, data, etc. If you do not agree with the reviewers’ views, then include your arguments in the updated manuscript. Also, note that if a reviewer suggested references, you should only add ones that will make your article better and more complete. Recommending references to specific publications is not appropriate for reviewers and you should report excessive cases to ieeeaccessEIC@ieee.org.

We highly recommend that you review the grammar one more time before resubmitting.  IEEE offers a 3rd party service for language polishing, which you may utilize for a fee: https://www.aje.com/c/ieee (use the URL to claim a 10% discount).

Please be advised that authors are only permitted to resubmit their article ONCE. If the updated manuscript is determined not to have addressed all of the previous reviewers’ concerns, the article may be rejected and no further resubmissions will be allowed.

When resubmitting, please submit as a new manuscript and include the following 3 files:

1)        A document containing your response to reviewers from the previous peer review.  The “response to reviewers” document (template attached) should have the following regarding each comment: a) Reviewer’s concern, b) your response to the concern, c) your action to remedy the concern. The document should be uploaded with your manuscript files as a “Supplemental File for Review.”
2)        Your updated manuscript with all your individual changes highlighted, including grammatical changes (e.g. preferably with the yellow highlight tool within the pdf file). This file should be uploaded with your manuscript files as a “Supplemental File for Review”.
3)        A clean copy of the final manuscript (without highlighted changes) should be submitted as the “Formatted (Double Column) Main File – PDF Document Only.”

Finally, in your cover letter, please indicate if you would like us to assign your article to the same or different reviewers and we will do our best to accommodate your request.

We sincerely hope you will update your manuscript and resubmit soon. Please contact me if you have any questions.

Thank you for your interest in IEEE Access.

Sincerely,

Dr. Taha Selim Ustun
Associate Editor, IEEE Access
tahaselim@yahoo.com

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged)

Comments:
Without comments

Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: A little. Only with the statistical method to select the Travelling Wave Detector and  the nearest fault place.

Is the paper technically sound?: It presents as a disadvantage the costs associated with the amount of necessary Travelling Wave Detectors as the number of terminals in the power distribution network increases

Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes

Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: It lacks review on the effect of induction due to atmospheric discharges on the response of the Traveling Wave proposed methods


Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged)

Comments:
The authors should modify the manuscript.

Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes

Is the paper technically sound?: Yes

Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes

Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes

If you have any questions, please contact article administrator: Mr. Nishant Shukla n.shukla@ieee.org
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

13519130470

新虫 (正式写手)



CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
投吧 刚审了一篇access

发自小木虫IOS客户端
4楼2019-08-14 15:01:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ruijia2017

金虫 (正式写手)



CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
5楼2019-08-14 15:20:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

iyx_yao

至尊木虫 (著名写手)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
这些审稿人太水了。。。。
12楼2019-08-17 22:31:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dying

金虫 (小有名气)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
。。。这个什么审稿意见啊
14楼2019-09-04 16:05:40
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
韩文珩2楼
2019-08-14 15:01   回复  
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
2019-08-14 15:01   回复  
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
怡宝~6楼
2019-08-14 15:22   回复  
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
mtw9227楼
2019-08-14 15:37   回复  
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
2019-08-14 20:25   回复  
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
2019-08-14 20:30   回复  
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
2019-08-15 16:18   回复  
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
psylhh11楼
2019-08-17 22:14   回复  
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
zt_geo13楼
2019-09-03 22:45   回复  
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 CRHUSTSEEE 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[论文投稿] 小弟投了一篇论文,一个月了还是with editor +13 zsm1994 2020-08-10 16/800 2020-08-13 09:53 by yanngyongjun
[基金申请] 杰青出炉,看了地面青马上都要揭晓了,如果中了你会庆祝吗?怎么庆祝? +29 benzchow 2020-08-11 41/2050 2020-08-13 09:13 by auliuym
[硕博家园] 申请硕博连读 +3 bnm852 2020-08-12 5/250 2020-08-13 08:25 by 傻猪咪
[论文投稿] 谁来帮我看看催搞后这个回复啥意思,为啥我感觉很慌 500+3 景行晨曦 2020-08-12 8/400 2020-08-13 08:07 by cgy03023
[博后之家] 如何发展? +10 哈雷摩托V 2020-08-12 12/600 2020-08-13 07:21 by yaoshunzhen
[基金申请] 面上8月底会公布结果吗? +12 lingchu 2020-08-12 12/600 2020-08-12 23:57 by 123dingyc
[基金申请] 工材会评时间 +6 bondstar 2020-08-12 6/300 2020-08-12 20:10 by xg3551
[基金申请] 给各位在基金申请中苦苦挣扎的高校教师,尤其是青年教师的忠告! +33 nandi2212 2020-08-10 35/1750 2020-08-12 17:43 by buhaobuhuai
[公派出国] 2020美国联合培养 +19 aque1314 2020-08-08 24/1200 2020-08-12 09:24 by 公务员小马
[基金申请] 今年这么早的公布杰青? +6 hdzw9071 2020-08-11 7/350 2020-08-11 23:40 by 撸猫猫
[基金申请] 2020年国家杰青名单公示了 +9 lingshidao 2020-08-11 10/500 2020-08-11 22:17 by linlibuzhang
[基金申请] 漏标通讯直接否决么 +19 qiuqiuyu911 2020-08-09 29/1450 2020-08-11 08:31 by 澈丰丶
[教师之家] 政审 +10 扶摇直上12 2020-08-10 29/1450 2020-08-11 06:40 by 扶摇直上12
[基金申请] 后缀什么的,可能都是无效的,本人实测结果,大家有时间还是多看看文献吧 +6 edmond024 2020-08-10 6/300 2020-08-10 23:45 by 879728340
[基金申请] 博后67批刚中,但马上要出站了。 这种情况出站时,需要立即写基金结题报告吗 +4 zhgong007 2020-08-10 6/300 2020-08-10 18:50 by liqianliwi
[论文投稿] 爱斯维尔期刊,论文接受后需要填写版权协议吗 15+3 雨滴先生 2020-08-06 11/550 2020-08-10 14:32 by 期待成长
[论文投稿] Under Review半年时间没变,是否要催稿? 5+6 jsslsxyq 2020-08-09 8/400 2020-08-10 10:07 by 苏州华博
[版块工场] 【早起签到贴】2020年8月8日(q q 48626260 进群申请:小木虫——您个人ID) +52 8475 2020-08-08 52/2600 2020-08-09 09:24 by alford
[论文投稿] 综述性论文 +10 子萍—木子 2020-08-07 14/700 2020-08-08 17:50 by bcbbc
[基金申请] 医学部什么时候会评啊? +3 coottt 2020-08-06 4/200 2020-08-07 13:46 by jiabeixi_2006
信息提示
请填处理意见