24小时热门版块排行榜     意得辑论文润色7折!即将结束

查看: 550  |  回复: 11


新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] IEEE Access这样的初审意见还有戏吗?

7月11日投稿Access一篇,33天收到初审意见,2个评审专家,都是拒稿鼓励重投,一个审稿人没有意见,另一个说需要对论文进行调整。初审意见如下,各位大神帮忙看看,有没有遇到这种情况?重投还有戏吗?另外,因为没有什么具体的意见,additional questions中审稿人的评价还需要作出回复吗?

I am writing to you in regards to manuscript # Access-2019-26335 entitled "Computational Fault Time Difference Based Fault Location Method for Branched Power Distribution Networks" which you submitted to IEEE Access.

In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has not been recommended for publication in IEEE Access.

We do encourage you to revise and resubmit your article once you have addressed the concerns and criticisms of the reviewers.  I believe they have added good insight on how to further improve your article.  IEEE Access has a binary peer review process that does not allow revisions. Therefore, in order to uphold quality to IEEE standards, an article is rejected even if it requires minor edits.

Please revise your manuscript based on reviewers’ feedback and resubmit; elaborate on your points and clarify with references, examples, data, etc. If you do not agree with the reviewers’ views, then include your arguments in the updated manuscript. Also, note that if a reviewer suggested references, you should only add ones that will make your article better and more complete. Recommending references to specific publications is not appropriate for reviewers and you should report excessive cases to ieeeaccessEIC@ieee.org.

We highly recommend that you review the grammar one more time before resubmitting.  IEEE offers a 3rd party service for language polishing, which you may utilize for a fee: https://www.aje.com/c/ieee (use the URL to claim a 10% discount).

Please be advised that authors are only permitted to resubmit their article ONCE. If the updated manuscript is determined not to have addressed all of the previous reviewers’ concerns, the article may be rejected and no further resubmissions will be allowed.

When resubmitting, please submit as a new manuscript and include the following 3 files:

1)        A document containing your response to reviewers from the previous peer review.  The “response to reviewers” document (template attached) should have the following regarding each comment: a) Reviewer’s concern, b) your response to the concern, c) your action to remedy the concern. The document should be uploaded with your manuscript files as a “Supplemental File for Review.”
2)        Your updated manuscript with all your individual changes highlighted, including grammatical changes (e.g. preferably with the yellow highlight tool within the pdf file). This file should be uploaded with your manuscript files as a “Supplemental File for Review”.
3)        A clean copy of the final manuscript (without highlighted changes) should be submitted as the “Formatted (Double Column) Main File – PDF Document Only.”

Finally, in your cover letter, please indicate if you would like us to assign your article to the same or different reviewers and we will do our best to accommodate your request.

We sincerely hope you will update your manuscript and resubmit soon. Please contact me if you have any questions.

Thank you for your interest in IEEE Access.


Dr. Taha Selim Ustun
Associate Editor, IEEE Access

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged)

Without comments

Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: A little. Only with the statistical method to select the Travelling Wave Detector and  the nearest fault place.

Is the paper technically sound?: It presents as a disadvantage the costs associated with the amount of necessary Travelling Wave Detectors as the number of terminals in the power distribution network increases

Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes

Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: It lacks review on the effect of induction due to atmospheric discharges on the response of the Traveling Wave proposed methods

Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: Reject (update and resubmit encouraged)

The authors should modify the manuscript.

Additional Questions:
Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes

Is the paper technically sound?: Yes

Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes

Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes

If you have any questions, please contact article administrator: Mr. Nishant Shukla n.shukla@ieee.org

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:


已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )


新虫 (正式写手)

CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
投吧 刚审了一篇access

4楼2019-08-14 15:01:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖


银虫 (正式写手)

CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
5楼2019-08-14 15:20:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖


铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
12楼2019-08-17 22:31:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
2019-08-14 15:01   回复  
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2019-08-14 15:01   回复  
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2019-08-14 15:22   回复  
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2019-08-14 15:37   回复  
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2019-08-14 20:25   回复  
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2019-08-14 20:30   回复  
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
2019-08-15 16:18   回复  
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2019-08-17 22:14   回复  
CRHUSTSEEE(金币+1): 谢谢参与
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 CRHUSTSEEE 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[教师之家] 副教授能报销高铁一等座吗? +27 nature24 2019-08-22 28/1400 2019-08-23 15:25 by tianxiaochun
[外语学习] PETS5资料 +17 lafar 2019-08-20 17/850 2019-08-23 14:59 by 木木yukee
[硕博家园] 生活饮用水 +6 风舞九天 2019-08-21 11/550 2019-08-23 14:25 by 风舞九天
[基金申请] 基金任务计划书的填写 10+6 cui_junjun 2019-08-22 11/550 2019-08-23 12:13 by frank0819
[机械] ug怎么画这个图 +3 梦笑颜 2019-08-19 6/300 2019-08-22 21:51 by 一大波橙色
[教师之家] 木虫上看到很多当前非升即走,没有编制高校的负面消息,大家怎么看? +7 515473229 2019-08-20 10/500 2019-08-22 18:26 by jj@sj
[考博] 博士毕业31岁,是不是年龄太大了 +65 WJSza 2019-08-18 126/6300 2019-08-22 16:42 by xuetao1983
[找工作] 有编高校和没编高校选择 10+7 疯狂豆豆儿 2019-08-19 25/1250 2019-08-22 15:12 by kimist
[论文投稿] National Science Review这个期刊的认可度 +4 青清离离远 2019-08-21 13/650 2019-08-22 14:27 by q8256733ww
[基金申请] 211海归,拿到地方人才项目,但青年基金挂了,能评上副高么 +4 zxl19841013 2019-08-17 30/1500 2019-08-22 14:02 by njrice
[找工作] 高校有编和无编的区别 +5 springner 2019-08-20 7/350 2019-08-21 14:37 by 菊花吹雪
[教师之家] 当你爱上科研,梦想只是时间 +10 crj1234 2019-08-19 11/550 2019-08-21 09:59 by Okita0119
[基金申请] 贴一个打酱油的优青评审意见,应该今后不用再想了。。 +10 mrkang 2019-08-19 13/650 2019-08-20 16:00 by edmund7
[基金申请] 求大家伙帮我看看我这个面上的评审意见,大概是什么等级?以及为啥只有3个意见? +4 帝景天成 2019-08-19 7/350 2019-08-20 10:03 by 帝景天成
[职场人生] 工作两年,混成一个loser +17 littlegrace 2019-08-17 29/1450 2019-08-19 21:40 by kitten1983aw
[基金申请] 请问有申请复审的必要么。。。 +26 阿快宝宝 2019-08-19 27/1350 2019-08-19 12:53 by 巨龙1号
[找工作] 机械研究生偏工控方向找工作怎么样呢? +3 杜绝 2019-08-18 5/250 2019-08-19 12:50 by 杜绝
[基金申请] 请大家指教一下,这个评语如何,能看出是什么等级否? +4 silvercoral 2019-08-19 4/200 2019-08-19 12:37 by lc1984
[基金申请] 青基更换依托单位问题求助,谢谢! 99+3 zx2008011124 2019-08-18 14/700 2019-08-19 11:53 by summer*
[论文投稿] 如何发表SCI +4 丢了过去A 2019-08-19 4/200 2019-08-19 11:36 by nkdyhb1018