| 查看: 475 | 回复: 1 | |||
[求助]
怎么翻译都感觉不对啊,麻烦翻一下
|
| One reason for this difference is that biological macromolecules are much more flexible than the component molecules studied in 2D supramolecular assemblies, which are small and, with some exceptions, are often treated as quasi-rigid building blocks. |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章,我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有4人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有5人回复
有院领导为了换新车,用横向课题经费买了俩车
已经有7人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有6人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有6人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全
已经有6人回复
818james
铜虫 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 140
- 应助: 59 (初中生)
- 金币: 7611.1
- 红花: 17
- 帖子: 1455
- 在线: 878.1小时
- 虫号: 3719023
- 注册: 2015-03-08
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
qianyuxin: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2016-02-05 23:22:08
qianyuxin: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2016-02-05 23:22:08
|
One reason for this difference is that biological macromolecules are much more flexible than the component molecules studied in 2D supramolecular assemblies, which are small and, with some exceptions, are often treated as quasi-rigid building blocks. 差异的原因之一是生物大分子比在2D超分子组合中研究的组成分子柔韧很多,后者体积小,除了个别例外,通常被看作是半刚性的构造块。 |
2楼2016-02-05 22:45:43













回复此楼