| 查看: 484 | 回复: 1 | |||
[求助]
怎么翻译都感觉不对啊，麻烦翻一下
|
| One reason for this difference is that biological macromolecules are much more flexible than the component molecules studied in 2D supramolecular assemblies, which are small and, with some exceptions, are often treated as quasi-rigid building blocks. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
285求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
085600材料与化工301分求调剂院校
已经有19人回复
-
277工科求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
277求调剂 数一104分
已经有13人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
336求调剂，一志愿中科大
已经有6人回复
-
071000生物学，一志愿深圳大学296分，求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
一志愿北京化工085600 310分求调剂
已经有19人回复
-
274求调剂求调剂
已经有7人回复
818james
铜虫 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 140
- 应助: 59 (初中生)
- 金币: 7611.1
- 红花: 17
- 帖子: 1455
- 在线: 878.1小时
- 虫号: 3719023
- 注册: 2015-03-08
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
qianyuxin: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2016-02-05 23:22:08
qianyuxin: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2016-02-05 23:22:08
|
One reason for this difference is that biological macromolecules are much more flexible than the component molecules studied in 2D supramolecular assemblies, which are small and, with some exceptions, are often treated as quasi-rigid building blocks. 差异的原因之一是生物大分子比在2D超分子组合中研究的组成分子柔韧很多，后者体积小，除了个别例外，通常被看作是半刚性的构造块。 |
2楼2016-02-05 22:45:43
