| 查看: 500 | 回复: 1 | ||
[求助]
怎么翻译都感觉不对啊，麻烦翻一下
|
| One reason for this difference is that biological macromolecules are much more flexible than the component molecules studied in 2D supramolecular assemblies, which are small and, with some exceptions, are often treated as quasi-rigid building blocks. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
面上项目没有好文章就没希望了吗？
已经有16人回复
-
困死了
已经有8人回复
-
不知道还有没有招博士的学校了
已经有5人回复
-
材料博士申请
已经有5人回复
-
还有课题组有博士名额吗
已经有6人回复
-
关于水星近日点进动成因的质疑 与实证分析
已经有10人回复
-
博士申请
已经有3人回复
-
重庆理工大学副校长遇刺身亡 传涉案副教授疑因积怨行凶
已经有4人回复
818james
铜虫 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 140
- 应助: 59 (初中生)
- 金币: 7611.1
- 红花: 17
- 帖子: 1455
- 在线: 878.1小时
- 虫号: 3719023
- 注册: 2015-03-08
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
qianyuxin: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2016-02-05 23:22:08
qianyuxin: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2016-02-05 23:22:08
|
One reason for this difference is that biological macromolecules are much more flexible than the component molecules studied in 2D supramolecular assemblies, which are small and, with some exceptions, are often treated as quasi-rigid building blocks. 差异的原因之一是生物大分子比在2D超分子组合中研究的组成分子柔韧很多，后者体积小，除了个别例外，通常被看作是半刚性的构造块。 |
2楼2016-02-05 22:45:43