| 查看: 466 | 回复: 1 | ||
[求助]
怎么翻译都感觉不对啊，麻烦翻一下
|
| One reason for this difference is that biological macromolecules are much more flexible than the component molecules studied in 2D supramolecular assemblies, which are small and, with some exceptions, are often treated as quasi-rigid building blocks. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
A期刊撤稿
已经有5人回复
-
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名
已经有8人回复
-
26申博自荐
已经有7人回复
-
想换工作。大多数高校都是 评职称时 认可5年内在原单位取得的成果吗？
已经有4人回复
-
带资进组求博导收留
已经有9人回复
-
求助大佬们，伤口沾上了乙腈
已经有6人回复
-
最近几年招的学生写论文不引自己组发的文章
已经有9人回复
818james
铜虫 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 140
- 应助: 59 (初中生)
- 金币: 7611.1
- 红花: 17
- 帖子: 1455
- 在线: 878.1小时
- 虫号: 3719023
- 注册: 2015-03-08
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
qianyuxin: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2016-02-05 23:22:08
qianyuxin: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2016-02-05 23:22:08
|
One reason for this difference is that biological macromolecules are much more flexible than the component molecules studied in 2D supramolecular assemblies, which are small and, with some exceptions, are often treated as quasi-rigid building blocks. 差异的原因之一是生物大分子比在2D超分子组合中研究的组成分子柔韧很多，后者体积小，除了个别例外，通常被看作是半刚性的构造块。 |
2楼2016-02-05 22:45:43