| 查看: 486 | 回复: 1 | |||
[求助]
怎么翻译都感觉不对啊，麻烦翻一下
|
| One reason for this difference is that biological macromolecules are much more flexible than the component molecules studied in 2D supramolecular assemblies, which are small and, with some exceptions, are often treated as quasi-rigid building blocks. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料专硕(0856) 339分求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿华工085600 331分
已经有3人回复
-
268分085602化学工程调剂
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿中科院105500专业总分315求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
材料299专硕求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
086004 求调剂 309
已经有6人回复
-
280求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
085400 328分 求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
材料专硕322
已经有12人回复
-
一志愿华中农微生物，288分，三年实验经历
已经有3人回复
818james
铜虫 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 140
- 应助: 59 (初中生)
- 金币: 7611.1
- 红花: 17
- 帖子: 1455
- 在线: 878.1小时
- 虫号: 3719023
- 注册: 2015-03-08
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
qianyuxin: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2016-02-05 23:22:08
qianyuxin: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2016-02-05 23:22:08
|
One reason for this difference is that biological macromolecules are much more flexible than the component molecules studied in 2D supramolecular assemblies, which are small and, with some exceptions, are often treated as quasi-rigid building blocks. 差异的原因之一是生物大分子比在2D超分子组合中研究的组成分子柔韧很多，后者体积小，除了个别例外，通常被看作是半刚性的构造块。 |
2楼2016-02-05 22:45:43
