| 查看: 5524 | 回复: 62 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
zhangpip新虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
第一次投稿SCI,悲剧了,求前辈们帮忙分析 已有6人参与
|
||
|
投了一篇information sciences,15天后editor in chief 回信建议改投他刊,然后给了一些commens Our Editor-in-Chief, Professor W. P, has now carefully considered your paper, and we would like to encourage you to consider submitting your paper to some other journal that will be more suited to broadly disseminate your research results. For your guidance, please find his comments below. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Editor's comments: Editor's comments: AE: The paper proposes A multi-swarm adaptive particle swarm optimization with dynamic task allocation. Since the emphasis is on new method, the paper fails to justify the outperforming points of the new method. The paper is written with so many things together that one really is lost while understanding the motivation to take up the current study. The paper needs to be rewritten. The long list of experimental results along with some trivial graphical representations do not generate much interest as the discussion section is too weak. What about the extensions of the proposed method to constrained optimization problem ? The paper has lots of language related error. 不知道该怎么修改,也不知还能不能再投此刊,另外,主编最后说了一句论文中有语法错误,是不是必须进行润色呢?求经验人士给点建议! 大过年的,祝各位新年快乐! 发自小木虫Android客户端 [ Last edited by zhangpip on 2016-2-5 at 13:06 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
广西大学-广州大学招聘博士后 欢迎广大优秀人才!!!
已经有11人回复
闲聊
已经有3人回复
江苏省自然基金 什么时候出结果
已经有4人回复
如何查询2026年获批项目名称?
已经有3人回复
两块石头
已经有10人回复
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题
已经有19人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有15人回复
面上没中,邀请各位路过的虫友分析一下分数
已经有13人回复
初秋的晨风
已经有6人回复
Ei源刊怎么投
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
求推荐好导师
已经有3人回复
[材料类期刊]投稿求助
已经有21人回复
人生第一次投sci
已经有11人回复
第一次投SCI就是这个结果?
已经有25人回复
第一篇SCI接受的曲折过程:2次大修+1次小修+4次送审。
已经有223人回复
9楼2016-02-05 13:06:25
2楼2016-02-05 13:05:50
3楼2016-02-05 13:05:54
4楼2016-02-05 13:06:06










回复此楼