| 查看: 5648 | 回复: 62 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
zhangpip新虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
第一次投稿SCI,悲剧了,求前辈们帮忙分析 已有6人参与
|
||
|
投了一篇information sciences,15天后editor in chief 回信建议改投他刊,然后给了一些commens Our Editor-in-Chief, Professor W. P, has now carefully considered your paper, and we would like to encourage you to consider submitting your paper to some other journal that will be more suited to broadly disseminate your research results. For your guidance, please find his comments below. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Editor's comments: Editor's comments: AE: The paper proposes A multi-swarm adaptive particle swarm optimization with dynamic task allocation. Since the emphasis is on new method, the paper fails to justify the outperforming points of the new method. The paper is written with so many things together that one really is lost while understanding the motivation to take up the current study. The paper needs to be rewritten. The long list of experimental results along with some trivial graphical representations do not generate much interest as the discussion section is too weak. What about the extensions of the proposed method to constrained optimization problem ? The paper has lots of language related error. 不知道该怎么修改,也不知还能不能再投此刊,另外,主编最后说了一句论文中有语法错误,是不是必须进行润色呢?求经验人士给点建议! 大过年的,祝各位新年快乐! 发自小木虫Android客户端 [ Last edited by zhangpip on 2016-2-5 at 13:06 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
极限拉扯,如何抉择
已经有16人回复
40+中年人失业后,还能找到好工作吗?
已经有16人回复
人工智能虚构史料、伪造文献频现,多家期刊声明抵制
已经有4人回复
CsPbI2Br全无机钙钛矿SEM图像异常分析
已经有8人回复
用NBS溴化时溶剂除了CCl4外还有什么
已经有9人回复
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗?
已经有12人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
求推荐好导师
已经有3人回复
[材料类期刊]投稿求助
已经有21人回复
人生第一次投sci
已经有11人回复
第一次投SCI就是这个结果?
已经有25人回复
第一篇SCI接受的曲折过程:2次大修+1次小修+4次送审。
已经有223人回复
3楼2016-02-05 13:05:54
2楼2016-02-05 13:05:50
4楼2016-02-05 13:06:06
5楼2016-02-05 13:06:15










回复此楼