24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4949  |  回复: 58
【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子,参与交流,就有机会分得作者 薇啊薇vivi 的 3 个金币

薇啊薇vivi

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 被RSC advances拒稿要求重投了,求助大家帮忙看看邮件,我还有没有机会再被接收!!!已有10人参与

投了一个月,送审以后,一个大修,一个拒稿,编辑给了拒稿重投。但是第二个审稿人说话好tough啊。。。大神们求助,这种情况,还要不要再重投试试看啊。。。。
RSC Advances, published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. I sent your manuscript to reviewers and I have now received their reports which are copied below.

After careful evaluation of the manuscript and reviewers’ comments, I regret to inform you that I do not find your manuscript suitable for publication and therefore it has been rejected in its current form.

However, if you are able to fully address the concerns raised by the reviewers in the reports below, I will consider a substantially rewritten manuscript which takes into account all of the reviewers’ comments. If you choose to resubmit your manuscript, please include a point by point response to the reviewers’ comments and highlight the changes you have made.
REVIEWER REPORT(S):
Referee: 1

Recommendation: Major revisions

Comments:
In this work, the authors have prepared micro-patterns on PDMS and studied the effect of bacterial cell adhesion. With the growing interest in preparing surfaces with patterns/ topography to prepare anti-bacterial surfaces this is an important area of work. The results are interesting but there are a number of concerns that must be addressed before this work may be considered for publication-
1. A number of studies have been reported in this area of work in recent years, so the novelty of these features/ uniqueness of this work is unclear
2. The motivation for the choice of these features and their size ranges is not explained in the Introduction. It is partly discussed in the Discussion where how the feature sizes scale with bacterial sizes is discussed to explain the rationale. The Introduction section should be modified to incorporate the motivation more clearly.
3. Similar to comment 1 above, the discussion section should include how these results support or contradict the literature since many such studies have been reported.
4. Minor comment- In Fug 2, the y-axis may be expanded in the 0 to 15% range with a break to accommodate the control if needed to clearly present the results of the patterned surfaces which are barely visible now.
5. The authors are advised to take help from a native speaker to correct the grammatical errors in the text.


Referee: 2

Recommendation: Reject

Comments:
In this article author fabricated 3 different micro-patterned polydimethylsiloxane films with various pattern sizes from 0.5 μm to 4μm to study the effect of micro-patterned on the bacterial adhesion. Several similar studies already reported in the literatures.

From this study authors have drawn very general conclusion that the micro-pattern topography could reduce the attachment of these 3 strains. The difference between the pattern size and the bacteria size was crucial to the amount of bacteria adhered on the surfaces for different strains. This general knowledge already reported in several literatures. The present study and result is just a repeated experiment of what already published by several authors. This study does not provide any additional scientific knowledge what already known in the scientific community.

Authors used three different micro-patterned namely square, ridges and four-way grids. Authors did not explain the basis and rational of this particular design of this study. Authors should think critically on novelty and expected outcome of their work before designing and performing this experiment. Author should judge the scientific merit of their paper before sending for publication to any journal.


回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

grayong

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)

其实两个审稿人的观点是相仿的,就是你的文章没有把亮点写清楚甚至说没有亮点,第二个人的语气只是太直接而已。

你自己先衡量一下自己的工作,创新点究竟是哪些,再去看看是否可以说服审稿人。否则,还是改投吧。
5楼2016-01-08 10:07:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Great鲁晓文

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
你的工作为啥可以发,你要弄明白这一点,有啥特别,其次,工作中尽量做好做全做规范,这样才能审稿就接收

发自小木虫Android客户端
不知所以然,所以才会不知所以然
48楼2016-01-10 01:54:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

清聆

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我投这个杂志也遇到了跟楼主一样的情况,按照审稿人意见好好修改了之后重投了,之后小修接收,我感觉楼主可以考虑认真修改后重投。

发自小木虫Android客户端
清楚自己,聆听世界
54楼2016-01-11 22:08:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sunsuper110

铜虫 (小有名气)

不用理会第二个人的意见,明显是个愤青

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
2楼2016-01-07 21:30:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

薇啊薇vivi

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by sunsuper110 at 2016-01-07 21:30:43
不用理会第二个人的意见,明显是个愤青

好开心你回复我了!!!!感谢!!!
所以,你是不是建议我,就按第一个人的意见改好重投?
3楼2016-01-07 21:32:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

somerled

银虫 (小有名气)

我觉的对于第二个人,回复一下你文章的亮点

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2016-01-08 01:09:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

铁血军魂

木虫 (职业作家)

感觉还是创新点的问题吧。创新点阐述不明确,或者缺乏创新点!

发自小木虫Android客户端
6楼2016-01-08 12:29:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

benerjiaji

新虫 (小有名气)

可能会接收,这是RSC的惯于伎俩,好好修改,接收很可能

发自小木虫IOS客户端
10楼2016-01-08 13:22:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhulin198911

铜虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我已经投中一篇了,我觉得你最好将前言好好修改下,先肯定别人的工作,再说自己的工作与别人的不同,提出自己的优势(关于自己的优势多写写)。若是重投最好把题目改改,做到简洁,突出亮点。最后,关于推荐审稿人最好换换。
57楼2016-01-12 11:39:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

薇啊薇vivi

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by 铁血军魂 at 2016-01-08 12:29:39
感觉还是创新点的问题吧。创新点阐述不明确,或者缺乏创新点!

嗯呢,因为第一次写文章,introduction写的很笼统,没有讲自己的工作跟别人有什么差别。您觉得这种问题改好了还有机会吗?
我自己感觉创新还是有的,但是确实不多,希望改好还有机会中吧,谢谢!
7楼2016-01-08 12:49:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

薇啊薇vivi

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by grayong at 2016-01-08 10:07:18
其实两个审稿人的观点是相仿的,就是你的文章没有把亮点写清楚甚至说没有亮点,第二个人的语气只是太直接而已。

你自己先衡量一下自己的工作,创新点究竟是哪些,再去看看是否可以说服审稿人。否则,还是改投吧。

嗯呢,因为第一次写文章,introduction写的很笼统,没有讲自己的工作跟别人有什么差别。您觉得这种问题改好了还有机会吗?小老师说要继续改。。。哎。。。
我自己感觉创新还是有的,但是确实不多,希望改好还有机会中吧,谢谢!
8楼2016-01-08 12:50:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

薇啊薇vivi

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by somerled at 2016-01-08 01:09:22
我觉的对于第二个人,回复一下你文章的亮点

嗯呢,打算回复下。不过也挺担心第二个人不认可我,不知道重投是不是还要送到这两个人手里。。。
9楼2016-01-08 12:51:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 薇啊薇vivi 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 周五了,今天下午值得期待~ +16 llionlee007 2024-09-13 25/1250 2024-09-13 14:57 by zyl_001
[基金申请] 论文标注的基金名称不规范会影响项目结题吗? 20+7 肥头战斗猫 2024-09-11 11/550 2024-09-13 14:07 by 莱茵润色
[论文投稿] 已经毕业了小文章退改还要我改吗 5+7 bnnbsa 2024-09-10 22/1100 2024-09-13 14:03 by naodongl
[基金申请] 国自然的打包分组是固定的吗? +7 leicahfs 2024-09-12 7/350 2024-09-13 12:51 by Doncic1989
[论文投稿] 材料模拟计算求刊 5+4 研究生新大 2024-09-10 6/300 2024-09-13 10:29 by nono2009
[论文投稿] 求助各位大佬, JACS投稿至今1个月多一点,送审快一个月没动静正常吗 +5 1506948099 2024-09-08 5/250 2024-09-13 07:47 by HiRocLiN丶
[基金申请] 请问国社科限额申报的高校,学院内部是否有基本的遴选条件? +10 屡战屡败 2024-09-12 12/600 2024-09-12 23:46 by natalia1021
[基金申请] 教育部人文社科立项之后多久批项目号? 50+5 ice1514 2024-09-07 20/1000 2024-09-12 21:17 by 初来乍到的爱
[教师之家] 教师节表彰,无证书无奖金,花几个小时走过场 +10 河西夜郎 2024-09-12 10/500 2024-09-12 19:15 by tfang
[基金申请] +6 meiwanxiazai 2024-09-12 6/300 2024-09-12 18:21 by msuhlx
[基金申请] 青基有4篇SCI文章发表但是申请内容的大课题到结题时发不出来能结题吗? +3 lice_1987 2024-09-11 5/250 2024-09-12 15:33 by dxcharlary
[硕博家园] 好烦 +4 cyl-250368 2024-09-11 9/450 2024-09-12 14:58 by cyl-250368
[论文投稿] 请问 投稿系统里面给的返修时间截止了,还能提交返修手稿吗? +5 wangbaoyun_ 2024-09-08 5/250 2024-09-12 13:09 by j784024905
[论文投稿] 求助投过Physical Review系列文章的大牛 6+5 jin4ever 2024-09-09 9/450 2024-09-12 08:46 by jin4ever
[论文投稿] 求助投稿materials letters 40+4 liukun11 2024-09-11 7/350 2024-09-12 08:11 by maolC
[基金申请] 国社科,要看开,今年不中明年来。 +8 wjynus 2024-09-10 10/500 2024-09-11 23:15 by nxmaosheng
[考博] 吉林大学材料科学与工程学院赵晓教授招收2025年博士研究生2名(申请考核制博士生) +3 xzhao0311 2024-09-09 3/150 2024-09-11 11:27 by _djatm_
[基金申请] 受邀成为基金评委 +6 feiyi3986 2024-09-09 6/300 2024-09-10 16:22 by wspglt
[基金申请] 在国家经费有限的情况下,之前申请面上两年停1年确实资助率不至于今年这么低 +15 苏东坡二世 2024-09-07 18/900 2024-09-10 13:42 by kingzgh
[论文投稿] 中国抗生素杂志版面费 10+4 chumjun 2024-09-07 4/200 2024-09-07 22:19 by 莱茵润色
信息提示
请填处理意见