24小时热门版块排行榜    

汕头大学海洋科学、生物学、生物与医药等3个专业接受调剂
查看: 5241  |  回复: 58
【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子,参与交流,就有机会分得作者 薇啊薇vivi 的 3 个金币

薇啊薇vivi

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 被RSC advances拒稿要求重投了,求助大家帮忙看看邮件,我还有没有机会再被接收!!!已有10人参与

投了一个月,送审以后,一个大修,一个拒稿,编辑给了拒稿重投。但是第二个审稿人说话好tough啊。。。大神们求助,这种情况,还要不要再重投试试看啊。。。。
RSC Advances, published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. I sent your manuscript to reviewers and I have now received their reports which are copied below.

After careful evaluation of the manuscript and reviewers’ comments, I regret to inform you that I do not find your manuscript suitable for publication and therefore it has been rejected in its current form.

However, if you are able to fully address the concerns raised by the reviewers in the reports below, I will consider a substantially rewritten manuscript which takes into account all of the reviewers’ comments. If you choose to resubmit your manuscript, please include a point by point response to the reviewers’ comments and highlight the changes you have made.
REVIEWER REPORT(S):
Referee: 1

Recommendation: Major revisions

Comments:
In this work, the authors have prepared micro-patterns on PDMS and studied the effect of bacterial cell adhesion. With the growing interest in preparing surfaces with patterns/ topography to prepare anti-bacterial surfaces this is an important area of work. The results are interesting but there are a number of concerns that must be addressed before this work may be considered for publication-
1. A number of studies have been reported in this area of work in recent years, so the novelty of these features/ uniqueness of this work is unclear
2. The motivation for the choice of these features and their size ranges is not explained in the Introduction. It is partly discussed in the Discussion where how the feature sizes scale with bacterial sizes is discussed to explain the rationale. The Introduction section should be modified to incorporate the motivation more clearly.
3. Similar to comment 1 above, the discussion section should include how these results support or contradict the literature since many such studies have been reported.
4. Minor comment- In Fug 2, the y-axis may be expanded in the 0 to 15% range with a break to accommodate the control if needed to clearly present the results of the patterned surfaces which are barely visible now.
5. The authors are advised to take help from a native speaker to correct the grammatical errors in the text.


Referee: 2

Recommendation: Reject

Comments:
In this article author fabricated 3 different micro-patterned polydimethylsiloxane films with various pattern sizes from 0.5 μm to 4μm to study the effect of micro-patterned on the bacterial adhesion. Several similar studies already reported in the literatures.

From this study authors have drawn very general conclusion that the micro-pattern topography could reduce the attachment of these 3 strains. The difference between the pattern size and the bacteria size was crucial to the amount of bacteria adhered on the surfaces for different strains. This general knowledge already reported in several literatures. The present study and result is just a repeated experiment of what already published by several authors. This study does not provide any additional scientific knowledge what already known in the scientific community.

Authors used three different micro-patterned namely square, ridges and four-way grids. Authors did not explain the basis and rational of this particular design of this study. Authors should think critically on novelty and expected outcome of their work before designing and performing this experiment. Author should judge the scientific merit of their paper before sending for publication to any journal.


回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

grayong

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)

其实两个审稿人的观点是相仿的,就是你的文章没有把亮点写清楚甚至说没有亮点,第二个人的语气只是太直接而已。

你自己先衡量一下自己的工作,创新点究竟是哪些,再去看看是否可以说服审稿人。否则,还是改投吧。
5楼2016-01-08 10:07:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Great鲁晓文

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
你的工作为啥可以发,你要弄明白这一点,有啥特别,其次,工作中尽量做好做全做规范,这样才能审稿就接收

发自小木虫Android客户端
不知所以然,所以才会不知所以然
48楼2016-01-10 01:54:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

清聆

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我投这个杂志也遇到了跟楼主一样的情况,按照审稿人意见好好修改了之后重投了,之后小修接收,我感觉楼主可以考虑认真修改后重投。

发自小木虫Android客户端
清楚自己,聆听世界
54楼2016-01-11 22:08:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sunsuper110

铜虫 (小有名气)

不用理会第二个人的意见,明显是个愤青

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
2楼2016-01-07 21:30:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

薇啊薇vivi

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by sunsuper110 at 2016-01-07 21:30:43
不用理会第二个人的意见,明显是个愤青

好开心你回复我了!!!!感谢!!!
所以,你是不是建议我,就按第一个人的意见改好重投?
3楼2016-01-07 21:32:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

somerled

银虫 (小有名气)

我觉的对于第二个人,回复一下你文章的亮点

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2016-01-08 01:09:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

铁血军魂

木虫 (职业作家)

感觉还是创新点的问题吧。创新点阐述不明确,或者缺乏创新点!

发自小木虫Android客户端
6楼2016-01-08 12:29:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

benerjiaji

新虫 (小有名气)

可能会接收,这是RSC的惯于伎俩,好好修改,接收很可能

发自小木虫IOS客户端
10楼2016-01-08 13:22:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhulin198911

铜虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我已经投中一篇了,我觉得你最好将前言好好修改下,先肯定别人的工作,再说自己的工作与别人的不同,提出自己的优势(关于自己的优势多写写)。若是重投最好把题目改改,做到简洁,突出亮点。最后,关于推荐审稿人最好换换。
57楼2016-01-12 11:39:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

薇啊薇vivi

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by 铁血军魂 at 2016-01-08 12:29:39
感觉还是创新点的问题吧。创新点阐述不明确,或者缺乏创新点!

嗯呢,因为第一次写文章,introduction写的很笼统,没有讲自己的工作跟别人有什么差别。您觉得这种问题改好了还有机会吗?
我自己感觉创新还是有的,但是确实不多,希望改好还有机会中吧,谢谢!
7楼2016-01-08 12:49:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

薇啊薇vivi

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by grayong at 2016-01-08 10:07:18
其实两个审稿人的观点是相仿的,就是你的文章没有把亮点写清楚甚至说没有亮点,第二个人的语气只是太直接而已。

你自己先衡量一下自己的工作,创新点究竟是哪些,再去看看是否可以说服审稿人。否则,还是改投吧。

嗯呢,因为第一次写文章,introduction写的很笼统,没有讲自己的工作跟别人有什么差别。您觉得这种问题改好了还有机会吗?小老师说要继续改。。。哎。。。
我自己感觉创新还是有的,但是确实不多,希望改好还有机会中吧,谢谢!
8楼2016-01-08 12:50:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

薇啊薇vivi

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by somerled at 2016-01-08 01:09:22
我觉的对于第二个人,回复一下你文章的亮点

嗯呢,打算回复下。不过也挺担心第二个人不认可我,不知道重投是不是还要送到这两个人手里。。。
9楼2016-01-08 12:51:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 薇啊薇vivi 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 材料308求调剂 +18 凹凸曼_A 2025-04-03 18/900 2025-04-03 18:47 by As仙阁
[考研] 0703化学311分求调剂 +3 小张真的想读研 2025-04-03 3/150 2025-04-03 16:51 by JourneyLucky
[考研] 265求调剂 +6 13520877688 2025-04-03 6/300 2025-04-03 15:52 by pddpfdsjssp
[考研] 求材料调剂 +3 159753,Zxy 2025-04-03 4/200 2025-04-03 15:06 by 木卜心
[考研] 285求调剂,外语学的小语种 +3 啷个哩 2025-04-03 3/150 2025-04-03 14:55 by 川哥v5
[考研] 289求调剂 +8 柿多啤梨 2025-04-02 8/400 2025-04-03 14:51 by Ade.
[考研] 283分求调剂,工科08开头。 +3 耀生尘土 2025-04-03 3/150 2025-04-03 14:28 by 17313308663
[考研] 一志愿湖南师范大学,0703理学化学288求调剂 +13 jxl1314a. 2025-04-01 15/750 2025-04-03 13:53 by Ade.
[考研] 374求调剂 +3 Akukuku 2025-04-01 6/300 2025-04-03 12:56 by cbzhang
[考研] 323机械求调剂 +5 远远0123 2025-04-01 6/300 2025-04-03 10:20 by 远远0123
[考研] 0703化学调剂 +3 哈哈哈@. 2025-04-02 3/150 2025-04-02 19:27 by 噬血摄魂
[考研] 332求调剂 +3 halalatzxy 2025-04-01 3/150 2025-04-02 11:01 by yangyt0826
[考研] 313求调剂(专业070300,专业课一分析化学,专业课二为有机化学)) +11 风11225666666 2025-03-31 12/600 2025-04-02 10:24 by ldchemistry
[考研] 材料工程308,希望调剂 +7 mym333 2025-03-28 7/350 2025-04-01 21:56 by 乔乔有理~
[考研] 理学311,化学求调剂 +3 猛猛上岸asd 2025-04-01 3/150 2025-04-01 11:57 by C_yn
[考研] 085602 ,化工276求调剂 本科双非 +3 Ajdhcn 2025-03-29 3/150 2025-04-01 09:56 by houyaoxu
[考研] 271求调剂 +11 鲸语2024 2025-03-27 11/550 2025-03-31 12:33 by luosha500
[考研] 求调剂 主页有专业 +4 啾啾丫丫 2025-03-30 6/300 2025-03-31 04:31 by 多吃西瓜
[考研] 机械专硕297调剂 +4 李lfff 2025-03-30 6/300 2025-03-30 20:12 by 阿健1234
[考研] 294求调剂 +5 桉(っ?з?????? 2025-03-30 9/450 2025-03-30 16:54 by yujianx
信息提示
请填处理意见
复试调剂复试调剂
复试调剂二维码获取复试 & 调剂指南!微信扫一扫
商务合作商务合作
商务合作二维码商务合作咨询微信扫一扫(备注:商务合作)
学术干货学术干货
学术干货二维码微信扫一扫了解最新学术干货
论文辅导论文辅导
论文辅导二维码微信扫一扫添加老师,免费咨询
师资招募师资招募