24小时热门版块排行榜    

汕头大学海洋科学、生物学、生物与医药等3个专业接受调剂
查看: 5249  |  回复: 58
【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子,参与交流,就有机会分得作者 薇啊薇vivi 的 3 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

薇啊薇vivi

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 被RSC advances拒稿要求重投了,求助大家帮忙看看邮件,我还有没有机会再被接收!!!已有10人参与

投了一个月,送审以后,一个大修,一个拒稿,编辑给了拒稿重投。但是第二个审稿人说话好tough啊。。。大神们求助,这种情况,还要不要再重投试试看啊。。。。
RSC Advances, published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. I sent your manuscript to reviewers and I have now received their reports which are copied below.

After careful evaluation of the manuscript and reviewers’ comments, I regret to inform you that I do not find your manuscript suitable for publication and therefore it has been rejected in its current form.

However, if you are able to fully address the concerns raised by the reviewers in the reports below, I will consider a substantially rewritten manuscript which takes into account all of the reviewers’ comments. If you choose to resubmit your manuscript, please include a point by point response to the reviewers’ comments and highlight the changes you have made.
REVIEWER REPORT(S):
Referee: 1

Recommendation: Major revisions

Comments:
In this work, the authors have prepared micro-patterns on PDMS and studied the effect of bacterial cell adhesion. With the growing interest in preparing surfaces with patterns/ topography to prepare anti-bacterial surfaces this is an important area of work. The results are interesting but there are a number of concerns that must be addressed before this work may be considered for publication-
1. A number of studies have been reported in this area of work in recent years, so the novelty of these features/ uniqueness of this work is unclear
2. The motivation for the choice of these features and their size ranges is not explained in the Introduction. It is partly discussed in the Discussion where how the feature sizes scale with bacterial sizes is discussed to explain the rationale. The Introduction section should be modified to incorporate the motivation more clearly.
3. Similar to comment 1 above, the discussion section should include how these results support or contradict the literature since many such studies have been reported.
4. Minor comment- In Fug 2, the y-axis may be expanded in the 0 to 15% range with a break to accommodate the control if needed to clearly present the results of the patterned surfaces which are barely visible now.
5. The authors are advised to take help from a native speaker to correct the grammatical errors in the text.


Referee: 2

Recommendation: Reject

Comments:
In this article author fabricated 3 different micro-patterned polydimethylsiloxane films with various pattern sizes from 0.5 μm to 4μm to study the effect of micro-patterned on the bacterial adhesion. Several similar studies already reported in the literatures.

From this study authors have drawn very general conclusion that the micro-pattern topography could reduce the attachment of these 3 strains. The difference between the pattern size and the bacteria size was crucial to the amount of bacteria adhered on the surfaces for different strains. This general knowledge already reported in several literatures. The present study and result is just a repeated experiment of what already published by several authors. This study does not provide any additional scientific knowledge what already known in the scientific community.

Authors used three different micro-patterned namely square, ridges and four-way grids. Authors did not explain the basis and rational of this particular design of this study. Authors should think critically on novelty and expected outcome of their work before designing and performing this experiment. Author should judge the scientific merit of their paper before sending for publication to any journal.


回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhulin198911

铜虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我已经投中一篇了,我觉得你最好将前言好好修改下,先肯定别人的工作,再说自己的工作与别人的不同,提出自己的优势(关于自己的优势多写写)。若是重投最好把题目改改,做到简洁,突出亮点。最后,关于推荐审稿人最好换换。
57楼2016-01-12 11:39:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 59 个回答

sunsuper110

铜虫 (小有名气)

不用理会第二个人的意见,明显是个愤青

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
2楼2016-01-07 21:30:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

薇啊薇vivi

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by sunsuper110 at 2016-01-07 21:30:43
不用理会第二个人的意见,明显是个愤青

好开心你回复我了!!!!感谢!!!
所以,你是不是建议我,就按第一个人的意见改好重投?
3楼2016-01-07 21:32:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

somerled

银虫 (小有名气)

我觉的对于第二个人,回复一下你文章的亮点

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2016-01-08 01:09:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 课题组包进,实力雄厚,抓紧时间啦! +3 大黄鸭HQR 2025-04-07 4/200 2025-04-07 19:45 by 清屏怪
[考研] 310求调剂 +9 tangyoubaba 2025-04-07 9/450 2025-04-07 19:06 by haomaier
[考研] 314求调剂 +3 3xin 2025-04-06 4/200 2025-04-07 17:49 by wandecheng
[考研] 300求调剂 +6 徐业凡 2025-04-01 7/350 2025-04-07 16:54 by lijunpoly
[考研] 328求调剂 +11 修。。。。 2025-04-05 12/600 2025-04-07 14:05 by wohaoxiang
[考研] 270求调剂 +6 里昂 s 2025-04-01 6/300 2025-04-07 12:42 by z648054048
[考研] 070300化学331,一志愿华中师范大学,求调剂 +7 sparkle? 2025-04-03 10/500 2025-04-07 08:27 by shangxh
[考研] 0857资源与环境专硕 求调剂 +10 吃点苹果派 2025-04-03 11/550 2025-04-06 22:06 by 平静的小番薯
[考研] 材料工程 338求调剂 +5 濛濛随风过 2025-04-04 5/250 2025-04-06 20:36 by jld
[考研] 轻工类 082200 273分 考了数学 单科均已过A区线 +7 Pdz666 2025-04-05 7/350 2025-04-06 11:15 by lpl364211
[考研] 324求调剂 +3 无敌海皮皮 2025-04-05 3/150 2025-04-06 10:06 by brbrm
[考研] 浙江地方省属高校,本人植物生物信息学方向 +5 lucky YQ 2025-04-04 7/350 2025-04-05 22:01 by 晨风d2025
[考研] 求调剂 +5 我要上学@?!? 2025-04-04 5/250 2025-04-05 12:57 by 诗与自由
[考研] 346求调剂 +3 chichoo21 2025-04-03 3/150 2025-04-05 08:14 by lfhuang
[考研] 材料调剂 +6 文文睡觉了 2025-04-03 6/300 2025-04-03 23:31 by yanenwang
[考研] 求调剂 +13 要有学上啊一定 2025-04-01 13/650 2025-04-03 19:10 by 安之两隅
[考研] 346求调剂 +3 ysy: 2025-04-03 4/200 2025-04-03 14:38 by 褚迎松小小
[考研] 机械专硕333分求调剂 +5 马敬涛 2025-04-03 5/250 2025-04-03 11:22 by dai
[考研] 求调剂 +6 a丁月 2025-04-02 6/300 2025-04-02 13:00 by darling_wang
[考研] 食品调剂 +5 你就保保暖 2025-04-01 7/350 2025-04-01 16:00 by jcj312
信息提示
请填处理意见
复试调剂复试调剂
复试调剂二维码获取复试 & 调剂指南!微信扫一扫
商务合作商务合作
商务合作二维码商务合作咨询微信扫一扫(备注:商务合作)
学术干货学术干货
学术干货二维码微信扫一扫了解最新学术干货
论文辅导论文辅导
论文辅导二维码微信扫一扫添加老师,免费咨询
师资招募师资招募