24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 5093  |  回复: 58
【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子,参与交流,就有机会分得作者 薇啊薇vivi 的 3 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

薇啊薇vivi

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 被RSC advances拒稿要求重投了,求助大家帮忙看看邮件,我还有没有机会再被接收!!!已有10人参与

投了一个月,送审以后,一个大修,一个拒稿,编辑给了拒稿重投。但是第二个审稿人说话好tough啊。。。大神们求助,这种情况,还要不要再重投试试看啊。。。。
RSC Advances, published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. I sent your manuscript to reviewers and I have now received their reports which are copied below.

After careful evaluation of the manuscript and reviewers’ comments, I regret to inform you that I do not find your manuscript suitable for publication and therefore it has been rejected in its current form.

However, if you are able to fully address the concerns raised by the reviewers in the reports below, I will consider a substantially rewritten manuscript which takes into account all of the reviewers’ comments. If you choose to resubmit your manuscript, please include a point by point response to the reviewers’ comments and highlight the changes you have made.
REVIEWER REPORT(S):
Referee: 1

Recommendation: Major revisions

Comments:
In this work, the authors have prepared micro-patterns on PDMS and studied the effect of bacterial cell adhesion. With the growing interest in preparing surfaces with patterns/ topography to prepare anti-bacterial surfaces this is an important area of work. The results are interesting but there are a number of concerns that must be addressed before this work may be considered for publication-
1. A number of studies have been reported in this area of work in recent years, so the novelty of these features/ uniqueness of this work is unclear
2. The motivation for the choice of these features and their size ranges is not explained in the Introduction. It is partly discussed in the Discussion where how the feature sizes scale with bacterial sizes is discussed to explain the rationale. The Introduction section should be modified to incorporate the motivation more clearly.
3. Similar to comment 1 above, the discussion section should include how these results support or contradict the literature since many such studies have been reported.
4. Minor comment- In Fug 2, the y-axis may be expanded in the 0 to 15% range with a break to accommodate the control if needed to clearly present the results of the patterned surfaces which are barely visible now.
5. The authors are advised to take help from a native speaker to correct the grammatical errors in the text.


Referee: 2

Recommendation: Reject

Comments:
In this article author fabricated 3 different micro-patterned polydimethylsiloxane films with various pattern sizes from 0.5 μm to 4μm to study the effect of micro-patterned on the bacterial adhesion. Several similar studies already reported in the literatures.

From this study authors have drawn very general conclusion that the micro-pattern topography could reduce the attachment of these 3 strains. The difference between the pattern size and the bacteria size was crucial to the amount of bacteria adhered on the surfaces for different strains. This general knowledge already reported in several literatures. The present study and result is just a repeated experiment of what already published by several authors. This study does not provide any additional scientific knowledge what already known in the scientific community.

Authors used three different micro-patterned namely square, ridges and four-way grids. Authors did not explain the basis and rational of this particular design of this study. Authors should think critically on novelty and expected outcome of their work before designing and performing this experiment. Author should judge the scientific merit of their paper before sending for publication to any journal.


回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhulin198911

铜虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我已经投中一篇了,我觉得你最好将前言好好修改下,先肯定别人的工作,再说自己的工作与别人的不同,提出自己的优势(关于自己的优势多写写)。若是重投最好把题目改改,做到简洁,突出亮点。最后,关于推荐审稿人最好换换。
57楼2016-01-12 11:39:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 59 个回答

sunsuper110

铜虫 (小有名气)

不用理会第二个人的意见,明显是个愤青

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
2楼2016-01-07 21:30:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

薇啊薇vivi

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by sunsuper110 at 2016-01-07 21:30:43
不用理会第二个人的意见,明显是个愤青

好开心你回复我了!!!!感谢!!!
所以,你是不是建议我,就按第一个人的意见改好重投?
3楼2016-01-07 21:32:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

somerled

银虫 (小有名气)

我觉的对于第二个人,回复一下你文章的亮点

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2016-01-08 01:09:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 考研有必要报机构吗 +6 青云要冲沪深 2025-01-20 8/400 2025-01-21 17:25 by 左方
[教师之家] 孩子期末考试成绩出来了 +18 zhousanduo 2025-01-18 18/900 2025-01-21 12:42 by 盲牛
[基金申请] 立个flag,祝同学们25年项目、基金和帽子大丰收 +9 xuexididi 2025-01-20 10/500 2025-01-21 11:49 by mollyzhang_2003
[基金申请] 还有两个月,大家基金写了多少了呢? +7 siwaxingge122 2025-01-20 8/400 2025-01-21 10:27 by siwaxingge122
[教师之家] 寒假大家会牺牲过年的时间写本子吗 +11 艾克斯奥特曼 2025-01-19 17/850 2025-01-21 07:14 by csyky2007
[考博] 2025材料申博 +4 梁艺艺 2025-01-20 8/400 2025-01-20 22:33 by CQ_2021Z
[教师之家] 学校开始砍本科专业 +11 zylfront 2025-01-17 15/750 2025-01-20 20:39 by LNP@mRNA
[考博] 26电化学申博+3篇一作、2篇共一SCI1区/2区TOP +6 Notodays 2025-01-18 7/350 2025-01-20 19:36 by ddr6021023
[硕博家园] 唉,再不毕业就不想读了。真是进退两难 +20 山雨亦奇 2025-01-19 31/1550 2025-01-20 19:25 by oputweb
[教师之家] 高校学院领导,三年一换届,不需要特别后台 +6 河西夜郎 2025-01-19 6/300 2025-01-20 19:02 by sika27
[硕博家园] 认为自己没有能力和脑子读博士,不想读博士的人 +20 201725404 2025-01-15 35/1750 2025-01-20 17:53 by 边城一浪子
[职场人生] 到底要不要换工作? +6 fengaiqin 2025-01-16 8/400 2025-01-20 17:20 by aochougan
[教师之家] 高校领导会对老师制定难以理解的考核要求,这个是服从性测试吗? +6 艾克斯奥特曼 2025-01-19 8/400 2025-01-20 08:57 by 杜慕黑
[基金申请] 高校反腐败开始了,中央美院人事处长被查,设计学院副院长被查 +11 babu2015 2025-01-15 12/600 2025-01-19 08:39 by 张开翅膀的鱼
[考研] 调剂 +3 gshsneid 2025-01-18 3/150 2025-01-18 17:29 by sccd00
[论文投稿] 爱思维尔投稿 20+4 用户ljy 2025-01-16 7/350 2025-01-18 11:46 by 大泡沫
[基金申请] 2025年度国家自然科学基金项目指南发布 +10 yexuqing 2025-01-14 10/500 2025-01-17 22:52 by physics2010
[基金申请] 自然基金申请可以网上填写了吗? +4 thirds 2025-01-17 5/250 2025-01-17 12:54 by pityzhou
[论文投稿] 审稿人要求补充超级电容器的循环性能,但正文已给出 50+3 时雨巛2023 2025-01-15 8/400 2025-01-16 15:57 by 时雨巛2023
[教师之家] 在审文章怎么撤稿? +4 jurkat.1640 2025-01-15 6/300 2025-01-16 10:45 by eseayl
信息提示
请填处理意见
鍟嗗姟鍚堜綔鍟嗗姟鍚堜綔
鍟嗗姟鍚堜綔浜岀淮鐮�鍟嗗姟鍚堜綔鍜ㄨ寰俊鎵竴鎵�(澶囨敞锛氬晢鍔″悎浣�)
瀛︽湳骞茶揣瀛︽湳骞茶揣
瀛︽湳骞茶揣浜岀淮鐮�寰俊鎵竴鎵�浜嗚В鏈€鏂板鏈共璐�
璁烘枃杈呭璁烘枃杈呭
璁烘枃杈呭浜岀淮鐮�寰俊鎵竴鎵�娣诲姞鑰佸笀锛屽厤璐瑰挩璇�
甯堣祫鎷涘嫙甯堣祫鎷涘嫙