| ²é¿´: 327 | »Ø¸´: 6 | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õßkqlee½«ÔùËÍÄú 3 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
kqleeľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
½ÌÊÚ
|
[ÇóÖú]
[u]ÒÔϾä×ÓÓ¢ÎÄÓ¦ÈçºÎ±í´ï?[/u]
|
|
|
Comment 1: Page 10, line 16: what's the meaning of "more kinetic energy in higher temperature"? Can it be changed into "higher kinetic energy at higher temperature"? ×öÒÔÏ»شðºÏÊÊÂð: Response: Thank you very much for your suggestion. The sentence "¡..more kinetic energy in higher temperature¡.." has been changed into "¡..higher kinetic energy at higher temperature¡..". ÒÔϾä×ÓÓ¢ÎÄÓ¦ÈçºÎ±í´ï? "more kinetic energy in higher temperature" ȷʵ²»×¼È·,²¢ÒÑÐÞ¸Ä³É "¡..higher kinetic energy at higher temperature¡..", |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
269Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
297Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
297Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ28È˻ظ´
267Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¿¼Ñе÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
314Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¿ó´ó£¬²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìר˶314·Ö£¬0856¿Éµ÷¶¼¿ÉÒÔ
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
»¹Óл¯¹¤¶þÂÖµ÷¼ÁµÄѧУÂð
ÒѾÓÐ31È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211 0703»¯Ñ§ 346·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
kqlee
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
½ÌÊÚ
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2796.1
- É¢½ð: 1344
- ºì»¨: 43
- Ìû×Ó: 2784
- ÔÚÏß: 355.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 510881
- ×¢²á: 2008-02-25
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »·¾³¹¤³Ì
3Â¥2008-09-21 12:00:49
yma
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3558.5
- É¢½ð: 188
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 589
- ÔÚÏß: 192.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 589658
- ×¢²á: 2008-08-30
- רҵ: ÎÞ»ú·Ç½ðÊôÀà¹âµçÐÅÏ¢Ó빦
¡ï ¡ï
kqlee(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0):²»ÊǺÜרҵ°¡
kqlee(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0):²»ÊǺÜרҵ°¡
| the sentence " " is, indeed, not quite clear and we have changed it into" " according to your suggestion. |
2Â¥2008-09-21 11:54:06
yma
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3558.5
- É¢½ð: 188
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 589
- ÔÚÏß: 192.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 589658
- ×¢²á: 2008-08-30
- רҵ: ÎÞ»ú·Ç½ðÊôÀà¹âµçÐÅÏ¢Ó빦
4Â¥2008-09-21 12:06:57
kqlee
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
½ÌÊÚ
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2796.1
- É¢½ð: 1344
- ºì»¨: 43
- Ìû×Ó: 2784
- ÔÚÏß: 355.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 510881
- ×¢²á: 2008-02-25
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »·¾³¹¤³Ì
5Â¥2008-09-21 12:11:19













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥