24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1116  |  回复: 4
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

brucelee2004

新虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 请大牛评价一下审稿意见已有4人参与

Your submission entitled "Application of Mobile Internet Thoughts for reducing the inequity of Chinese  Education Resources" has been received by Computers and Education. After a preliminary review by the editorial office, the following decision has been made: Preliminary rejection

The editorial office has decided that it still needs adaptations before reviewers can be appointed. We advise you to revise your paper, taking into account the following:

1.     Research questions, that drive the paper, should be built in the introduction from an ongoing and pertinent bibliography (up to 2015).
2.     Show that your research questions are relevant to readers of Computers & Education within context of and up-to-date and thorough review of the literature (up to 2015).
3.     Answer your research question in the conclusions; what did we learn compared with current, significant research (up to 2015).
4.     The added value of your work is not clear (for readers of Computers & Education) in the context of proper and current research (up to 2015).
5.     You have to validate your model and reach conclusions that are general enough to be interesting to a wider audience. The sample has to be sufficiently far-reaching so as to be representative to reach conclusions that are of interest to a wider audience. In the corresponding methodology show your analytical framework, the representativeness of the sample; the instruments used and  use statistical methods which are strong enough, see https://authors.elsevier.com/sd/article/S0360131515001463
6.     What are the limitations of your work?
7.     In the abstract you have to indicate: What is the problem? What did you do? What were your results? What did you learn?

In case you decide to resubmit your work to Computers and Education, please make reference to CAE-D-15-01383 in the accompanying letter and show how you addressed each of the above points.

好似编辑觉得文章的结论不清晰,论据不足,摘要表述不清,还需要在那些方面努力呢?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yjwang588

木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
这个看上去是交上去的稿子不符合要求,所以编辑部在确定审稿人和送给审稿人审的情况下,首先挡了下来。编辑部告诉你按照他们提出的7个要求改改文章。然后,在再次投稿的时候,也顺带写个letter说明你已经修改了他们的7个要求!
至于那7点要求具体是什么,等你每个要求送10个金币再说了~
YOU RAISE ME UP...TO MORE THAN I CAN BE
4楼2015-11-26 14:42:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 5 个回答

15929731947

新虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
貌似你的摘要写的很不好,论证不充足,引用他们的文章,并进行对比,等等

发自小木虫IOS客户端
2楼2015-11-26 14:32:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gindar

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
说得很清楚了,好好改。逐条逐个意见改

发自小木虫Android客户端
3楼2015-11-26 14:37:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ruileelucky

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
请问这篇文章最后重投了吗

发自小木虫Android客户端
5楼2018-02-12 18:31:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见