| 查看: 1855 | 回复: 10 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者firstluo将赠送您 10 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
firstluo金虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
PRB 编辑回信不适合发表，求助有没有挽回的机会？ 已有4人参与
|
||
|
PRB 编辑回信不适合发表，但是我感觉论文比较长，referee好像也没有认真看，还指出Probably there is more in the second part of the paper, however, the message is so diluted that it is hard to extract it. 具体意见如下，请大侠们不吝赐教！ ============================================================== Re: XXXX Dear Dr. YYY, The above manuscript has been reviewed by one of our referees. Comments from the report appear below. These comments suggest that the present manuscript is not suitable for publication in the Physical Review. Yours sincerely, XXXX Associate Editor ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Report of the Referee -- XXXXX ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The paper is nicely written. Nevertheless, I am afraid I do not understand the importance of the message and results. The derivation of the ME is pretty standard and the DB comes directly from the properties of the environment. As far as I understand, this is the recipe shown in the books so I am missing the new information here. The results presented indicate that, as it should be, the populations in the steady state are modified. Probably there is more in the second part of the paper, however, the message is so diluted that it is hard to extract it. I think that the paper needs a major revision with the new results highlighted. Personally, I do not consider the derivation of the ME one of them (see standard textbook derivation of the ME). |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
青椒八年已不青，大家都被折磨成啥样了？
已经有7人回复
-
为什么nbs上溴 没有产物点出现呢
已经有10人回复
-
救命帖
已经有11人回复
-
招博士
已经有5人回复
-
青年基金C终止
已经有3人回复
-
26申博求博导推荐-遥感图像处理方向
已经有4人回复
-
限项规定
已经有7人回复
-
西南交通大学国家级人才团队2026年博士研究生招生（考核制）—机械、材料、力学方向
已经有3人回复
-
英文综述是否需要润色及查重
已经有5人回复
qqgod
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 9097.2
- 散金: 29
- 红花: 1
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 435
- 在线: 851.2小时
- 虫号: 677145
- 注册: 2008-12-18
- 专业: 光学
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
| PRB悲剧了就转投别的杂志吧。PR系列的审稿人有时候喜欢乱说。但你拿他们也没有办法。事实上PR系列上很多文章的方法和结果都没有亮点，就是换个系统又做一遍，还偏生好发。新的方法和思路一般都被审稿人批一顿。我们组去年暑假一篇文章被PNAS接收了，这篇文章前年年底的时候先投PRL悲剧，转投PRA被审稿人乱批一顿，竟然也被拒了。第二天改格式投PNAS，这回遇见了内行，大修了两回中了。目前SCI引用20+。感觉PR系列的审稿人很不靠谱。可笑的是前不久出来一篇follow我们文章的工作发表在PRA上，还是EDITORS' SUGGESTION。 |
6楼2015-10-15 22:56:41
finalmusic5
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 48 (小学生)
- 金币: 3920.2
- 红花: 11
- 帖子: 484
- 在线: 411.1小时
- 虫号: 2468173
- 注册: 2013-05-17
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
2楼2015-10-15 14:06:43
firstluo
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1444.6
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 182
- 在线: 129.4小时
- 虫号: 127176
- 注册: 2005-12-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
3楼2015-10-15 14:43:09
4楼2015-10-15 20:06:26