24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2496  |  回复: 8
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

840562644

铁虫 (小有名气)

[求助] $$求教三个问题?$$SPL投稿2月零10天,被拒,过程列举,附审稿意见 已有1人参与

(2015年7月11日投稿,7月21日进入格式审查,8.1日通过格式审查,in peer review至今(9月22日),被拒,两个审稿人,一个给R但建议“大修”重投,一个给AQ。)

首先,请教各位虫友们,
     1. 我应该怎么处理这篇文章呢,我想尽快发一篇SCI,因为我想凭借文章来联系读博的导师(国内、国外)。
     2. 第一个审稿人说我的文章写的更像“research report”而不是“research paper”。我该怎么改正呢?
     3. 还有语言写作,导师是靠不住了,有没有好的方法来解决?
恳请虫友们多多指教!

附审稿意见:
AE
      Based on the attached set of reviews, I regret to inform you that I have to decide to REJECT the  paper for publication. In summary, the reviewers have reported weaknesses in terms of technical content and use of English language. Considering that the decision process for the IEEE Signal Processing Letters is BINARY (papers that need major revisions are not accepted), I regret that I cannot offer you a more positive decision at this point because we do appreciate your interest in publishing in the IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

REVIEWER 1:
#Recommendation: R - Reject (Paper Is Not Of Sufficient Quality Or Novelty To Be Published In This Transactions)
#Comments:
     In this paper, the authors proposed a new method to XXXX. In order to reduce the computational complexity, the authors did a nice try by XXX. The idea is interesting. However, this paper was written more like a research report instead of a research paper. Because the decision of IEEE SPL is binary, this reviewer suggests to reject the current version and encourages the authors to make a major revision and resubmit.
#major problems:
     1.XXxx
     2.XXxx
#There are several minor problems should be fixed:
     XXXXXXXXX
#Additional Questions:
     1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this transaction?: Yes
     2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Yes
#Explain:  
     3. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Somewhat Novel
     4. How would you rate the English usage? : Needs improvement
     6. Rate the references: Satisfactory

REVIEWER 2:
#Recommendation: AQ - Publish In Minor, Required Changes
#Comments:
    This work presents a novel XXXX based on XXXX. The proposed strategy consists of  XXXX. The proposed approach is compared with several existing techniques via simulations, where it either outperforms or is comparable to existing more complex algorithms.
     The paper is not very well written and needs English improvements in most sections even though the small mistakes do not prevent the assessment of the work. The technical contributions are reasonably good (XXX) and new in this context. The experimental validation is appropriate and the list of references acknowledge most recent contributions in the area.
     Based on the above comments, it is recommended acceptance of the manuscript subject to corrections in the English.
#Additional Questions:
     1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this transaction?: Yes
     2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Yes
#Explain:  
     3. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Somewhat Novel
     4. How would you rate the English usage? : Needs improvement
     6. Rate the references: Satisfactory
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cc-Cherie

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by nijingen at 2015-09-24 00:38:32
你已经投稿了,就不怕泄漏内容,很多大牛投稿后立即公开论文,说明自己先做出来的

请问投稿SPL,然后编辑部直接immediate reject ,说是Too much text and material is taken directly from other works,请问这是说抄袭么?还是重复率太高?还有机会修改后再投么?另外,请问一下论文查重可以使用这个么?https://www.turnitin.com.cn/

发自小木虫IOS客户端
8楼2016-08-16 22:13:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 9 个回答

nijingen

禁虫 (小有名气)

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
840562644: 金币+20, ★★★★★最佳答案 2015-09-25 23:59:14
本帖内容被屏蔽

2楼2015-09-22 23:38:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

840562644

铁虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by nijingen at 2015-09-22 23:38:02
1)重投很有希望
2)可以细化推导过程,简化常识性的描述
3)语言可以找润色公司,国外很多,可以搜索一下口碑好的

谢谢你!请问somewhat novel是个什么水平呢,能被接收吗?

发自小木虫Android客户端
3楼2015-09-23 11:01:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

840562644

铁虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by nijingen at 2015-09-22 23:38:02
1)重投很有希望
2)可以细化推导过程,简化常识性的描述
3)语言可以找润色公司,国外很多,可以搜索一下口碑好的

还有润色公司会不会泄露文章内容啊?有没有应对的方法?

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2015-09-23 11:17:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题 +7 瞬息宇宙 2026-09-01 14/700 2026-09-02 17:33 by ma0526
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 10/500 2026-09-02 11:35 by 大不刘6
[基金申请] 学科评审组评审是指会评吗? +5 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 5/250 2026-09-02 10:13 by 雨冰共舞
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +5 myrtle 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-09-02 02:42 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +6 ssyjh 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-09-01 20:01 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 面上函评意见出来了,像什么等级? 20+4 Tsingking1 2026-08-27 17/850 2026-09-01 19:51 by 超级无敌华子
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +13 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 14/700 2026-09-01 11:06 by feng6531
[论文投稿] 小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写 5+3 l1963982152 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-09-01 09:04 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +7 gdd2018 2026-08-28 12/600 2026-09-01 08:32 by 尼古拉斯小虫
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +7 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 11/550 2026-08-31 23:16 by hittle2008
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +6 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-31 21:18 by qdxxmc
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +7 echo8914667 2026-08-30 8/400 2026-08-31 17:00 by yihongxu
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
信息提示
请填处理意见