24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2461  |  回复: 8
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

840562644

铁虫 (小有名气)

[求助] $$求教三个问题?$$SPL投稿2月零10天,被拒,过程列举,附审稿意见 已有1人参与

(2015年7月11日投稿,7月21日进入格式审查,8.1日通过格式审查,in peer review至今(9月22日),被拒,两个审稿人,一个给R但建议“大修”重投,一个给AQ。)

首先,请教各位虫友们,
     1. 我应该怎么处理这篇文章呢,我想尽快发一篇SCI,因为我想凭借文章来联系读博的导师(国内、国外)。
     2. 第一个审稿人说我的文章写的更像“research report”而不是“research paper”。我该怎么改正呢?
     3. 还有语言写作,导师是靠不住了,有没有好的方法来解决?
恳请虫友们多多指教!

附审稿意见:
AE
      Based on the attached set of reviews, I regret to inform you that I have to decide to REJECT the  paper for publication. In summary, the reviewers have reported weaknesses in terms of technical content and use of English language. Considering that the decision process for the IEEE Signal Processing Letters is BINARY (papers that need major revisions are not accepted), I regret that I cannot offer you a more positive decision at this point because we do appreciate your interest in publishing in the IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

REVIEWER 1:
#Recommendation: R - Reject (Paper Is Not Of Sufficient Quality Or Novelty To Be Published In This Transactions)
#Comments:
     In this paper, the authors proposed a new method to XXXX. In order to reduce the computational complexity, the authors did a nice try by XXX. The idea is interesting. However, this paper was written more like a research report instead of a research paper. Because the decision of IEEE SPL is binary, this reviewer suggests to reject the current version and encourages the authors to make a major revision and resubmit.
#major problems:
     1.XXxx
     2.XXxx
#There are several minor problems should be fixed:
     XXXXXXXXX
#Additional Questions:
     1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this transaction?: Yes
     2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Yes
#Explain:  
     3. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Somewhat Novel
     4. How would you rate the English usage? : Needs improvement
     6. Rate the references: Satisfactory

REVIEWER 2:
#Recommendation: AQ - Publish In Minor, Required Changes
#Comments:
    This work presents a novel XXXX based on XXXX. The proposed strategy consists of  XXXX. The proposed approach is compared with several existing techniques via simulations, where it either outperforms or is comparable to existing more complex algorithms.
     The paper is not very well written and needs English improvements in most sections even though the small mistakes do not prevent the assessment of the work. The technical contributions are reasonably good (XXX) and new in this context. The experimental validation is appropriate and the list of references acknowledge most recent contributions in the area.
     Based on the above comments, it is recommended acceptance of the manuscript subject to corrections in the English.
#Additional Questions:
     1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this transaction?: Yes
     2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Yes
#Explain:  
     3. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Somewhat Novel
     4. How would you rate the English usage? : Needs improvement
     6. Rate the references: Satisfactory
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

840562644

铁虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by nijingen at 2015-09-22 23:38:02
1)重投很有希望
2)可以细化推导过程,简化常识性的描述
3)语言可以找润色公司,国外很多,可以搜索一下口碑好的

还有润色公司会不会泄露文章内容啊?有没有应对的方法?

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2015-09-23 11:17:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 9 个回答

nijingen

禁虫 (小有名气)

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
840562644: 金币+20, ★★★★★最佳答案 2015-09-25 23:59:14
本帖内容被屏蔽

2楼2015-09-22 23:38:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

840562644

铁虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by nijingen at 2015-09-22 23:38:02
1)重投很有希望
2)可以细化推导过程,简化常识性的描述
3)语言可以找润色公司,国外很多,可以搜索一下口碑好的

谢谢你!请问somewhat novel是个什么水平呢,能被接收吗?

发自小木虫Android客户端
3楼2015-09-23 11:01:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nijingen

禁虫 (小有名气)

本帖内容被屏蔽

5楼2015-09-24 00:38:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[博后之家] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急 +3 DpSrDtM079iu 2026-08-22 4/200 2026-08-23 01:04 by OEbVnUOu01ol
[考博] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 DpSrDtM079iu 2026-08-22 3/150 2026-08-23 00:55 by OEbVnUOu01ol
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急 +3 2JOx3r2CYEgw 2026-08-22 6/300 2026-08-23 00:52 by OEbVnUOu01ol
[考博] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 2JOx3r2CYEgw 2026-08-21 8/400 2026-08-23 00:28 by OEbVnUOu01ol
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急 +3 QTy3jDtz1uLt 2026-08-21 8/400 2026-08-22 23:51 by OEbVnUOu01ol
[论文投稿] 售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 2JOx3r2CYEgw 2026-08-22 3/150 2026-08-22 22:03 by OEbVnUOu01ol
[基金申请] filecode,4个jtjc了 +13 ziyangfang 2026-08-19 16/800 2026-08-22 17:08 by WH3796
[教师之家] 售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急 +4 2JOx3r2CYEgw 2026-08-21 4/200 2026-08-22 16:52 by sunzitan
[基金申请] 人气不行了 +8 fansofjerry 2026-08-21 8/400 2026-08-22 16:30 by zyqchem
[基金申请] 今天基金会出结果吗?20260819 +16 kkkl_v 2026-08-19 17/850 2026-08-22 16:12 by 阿布Abu
[基金申请] 放榜前的不淡定 40+4 snowwithsea 2026-08-19 14/700 2026-08-21 23:51 by cratir
[基金申请] 今日不放榜?网传国自然预计 8 月 27 日可查结果 +16 医学老男孩 2026-08-20 20/1000 2026-08-21 21:13 by Ldrop2023
[基金申请] 应该是下周三26日公布了吧? +4 哈哈蛤? 2026-08-21 4/200 2026-08-21 10:58 by Vivilian
[基金申请] 今天放榜没戏了吧 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-19 11/550 2026-08-21 10:06 by gltch
[基金申请] 基金啊基金 +4 longfie172 2026-08-20 4/200 2026-08-21 08:58 by mark mao
[基金申请] 今天系统多次维护,明天很可能放榜! +10 zju2000 2026-08-16 11/550 2026-08-20 20:02 by cl479861084
[基金申请] 时间戳变了,能看出什么问题? +18 基诺咪客 2026-08-17 23/1150 2026-08-20 17:19 by Godzela
[基金申请] 今天放榜吗? +14 布布和一二 2026-08-19 15/750 2026-08-19 18:07 by gltch
[基金申请] 朋友圈看到的 +6 wangzilk 2026-08-18 8/400 2026-08-19 10:55 by Haru815
[基金申请] 明天放榜? +5 Shxjjxjkx 2026-08-18 5/250 2026-08-18 18:14 by -大大大大大-
信息提示
请填处理意见