24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2148  |  回复: 8

840562644

铁虫 (小有名气)

[求助] $$求教三个问题?$$SPL投稿2月零10天,被拒,过程列举,附审稿意见已有1人参与

(2015年7月11日投稿,7月21日进入格式审查,8.1日通过格式审查,in peer review至今(9月22日),被拒,两个审稿人,一个给R但建议“大修”重投,一个给AQ。)

首先,请教各位虫友们,
     1. 我应该怎么处理这篇文章呢,我想尽快发一篇SCI,因为我想凭借文章来联系读博的导师(国内、国外)。
     2. 第一个审稿人说我的文章写的更像“research report”而不是“research paper”。我该怎么改正呢?
     3. 还有语言写作,导师是靠不住了,有没有好的方法来解决?
恳请虫友们多多指教!

附审稿意见:
AE
      Based on the attached set of reviews, I regret to inform you that I have to decide to REJECT the  paper for publication. In summary, the reviewers have reported weaknesses in terms of technical content and use of English language. Considering that the decision process for the IEEE Signal Processing Letters is BINARY (papers that need major revisions are not accepted), I regret that I cannot offer you a more positive decision at this point because we do appreciate your interest in publishing in the IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

REVIEWER 1:
#Recommendation: R - Reject (Paper Is Not Of Sufficient Quality Or Novelty To Be Published In This Transactions)
#Comments:
     In this paper, the authors proposed a new method to XXXX. In order to reduce the computational complexity, the authors did a nice try by XXX. The idea is interesting. However, this paper was written more like a research report instead of a research paper. Because the decision of IEEE SPL is binary, this reviewer suggests to reject the current version and encourages the authors to make a major revision and resubmit.
#major problems:
     1.XXxx
     2.XXxx
#There are several minor problems should be fixed:
     XXXXXXXXX
#Additional Questions:
     1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this transaction?: Yes
     2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Yes
#Explain:  
     3. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Somewhat Novel
     4. How would you rate the English usage? : Needs improvement
     6. Rate the references: Satisfactory

REVIEWER 2:
#Recommendation: AQ - Publish In Minor, Required Changes
#Comments:
    This work presents a novel XXXX based on XXXX. The proposed strategy consists of  XXXX. The proposed approach is compared with several existing techniques via simulations, where it either outperforms or is comparable to existing more complex algorithms.
     The paper is not very well written and needs English improvements in most sections even though the small mistakes do not prevent the assessment of the work. The technical contributions are reasonably good (XXX) and new in this context. The experimental validation is appropriate and the list of references acknowledge most recent contributions in the area.
     Based on the above comments, it is recommended acceptance of the manuscript subject to corrections in the English.
#Additional Questions:
     1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this transaction?: Yes
     2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Yes
#Explain:  
     3. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Somewhat Novel
     4. How would you rate the English usage? : Needs improvement
     6. Rate the references: Satisfactory
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nijingen

禁虫 (小有名气)

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
840562644: 金币+20, ★★★★★最佳答案 2015-09-25 23:59:14
本帖内容被屏蔽

2楼2015-09-22 23:38:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

840562644

铁虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by nijingen at 2015-09-22 23:38:02
1)重投很有希望
2)可以细化推导过程,简化常识性的描述
3)语言可以找润色公司,国外很多,可以搜索一下口碑好的

谢谢你!请问somewhat novel是个什么水平呢,能被接收吗?

发自小木虫Android客户端
3楼2015-09-23 11:01:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

840562644

铁虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by nijingen at 2015-09-22 23:38:02
1)重投很有希望
2)可以细化推导过程,简化常识性的描述
3)语言可以找润色公司,国外很多,可以搜索一下口碑好的

还有润色公司会不会泄露文章内容啊?有没有应对的方法?

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2015-09-23 11:17:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nijingen

禁虫 (小有名气)

本帖内容被屏蔽

5楼2015-09-24 00:38:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nijingen

禁虫 (小有名气)

本帖内容被屏蔽

6楼2015-09-24 00:40:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
7楼2015-09-24 01:47:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cc-Cherie

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by nijingen at 2015-09-24 00:38:32
你已经投稿了,就不怕泄漏内容,很多大牛投稿后立即公开论文,说明自己先做出来的

请问投稿SPL,然后编辑部直接immediate reject ,说是Too much text and material is taken directly from other works,请问这是说抄袭么?还是重复率太高?还有机会修改后再投么?另外,请问一下论文查重可以使用这个么?https://www.turnitin.com.cn/

发自小木虫IOS客户端
8楼2016-08-16 22:13:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nijingen

禁虫 (小有名气)

本帖内容被屏蔽

9楼2016-08-16 22:27:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 840562644 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见