| 查看: 2456 | 回复: 8 | ||
840562644铁虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
$$求教三个问题？$$SPL投稿2月零10天，被拒，过程列举，附审稿意见 已有1人参与
|
|
（2015年7月11日投稿，7月21日进入格式审查，8.1日通过格式审查，in peer review至今（9月22日），被拒，两个审稿人，一个给R但建议“大修”重投，一个给AQ。） 首先，请教各位虫友们， 1. 我应该怎么处理这篇文章呢，我想尽快发一篇SCI，因为我想凭借文章来联系读博的导师（国内、国外）。 2. 第一个审稿人说我的文章写的更像“research report”而不是“research paper”。我该怎么改正呢？ 3. 还有语言写作，导师是靠不住了，有没有好的方法来解决？ 恳请虫友们多多指教！ 附审稿意见： AE Based on the attached set of reviews, I regret to inform you that I have to decide to REJECT the paper for publication. In summary, the reviewers have reported weaknesses in terms of technical content and use of English language. Considering that the decision process for the IEEE Signal Processing Letters is BINARY (papers that need major revisions are not accepted), I regret that I cannot offer you a more positive decision at this point because we do appreciate your interest in publishing in the IEEE Signal Processing Letters. REVIEWER 1: #Recommendation: R - Reject (Paper Is Not Of Sufficient Quality Or Novelty To Be Published In This Transactions) #Comments: In this paper, the authors proposed a new method to XXXX. In order to reduce the computational complexity, the authors did a nice try by XXX. The idea is interesting. However, this paper was written more like a research report instead of a research paper. Because the decision of IEEE SPL is binary, this reviewer suggests to reject the current version and encourages the authors to make a major revision and resubmit. #major problems: 1.XXxx 2.XXxx #There are several minor problems should be fixed: XXXXXXXXX #Additional Questions: 1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this transaction?: Yes 2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Yes #Explain: 3. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Somewhat Novel 4. How would you rate the English usage? : Needs improvement 6. Rate the references: Satisfactory REVIEWER 2: #Recommendation: AQ - Publish In Minor, Required Changes #Comments: This work presents a novel XXXX based on XXXX. The proposed strategy consists of XXXX. The proposed approach is compared with several existing techniques via simulations, where it either outperforms or is comparable to existing more complex algorithms. The paper is not very well written and needs English improvements in most sections even though the small mistakes do not prevent the assessment of the work. The technical contributions are reasonably good (XXX) and new in this context. The experimental validation is appropriate and the list of references acknowledge most recent contributions in the area. Based on the above comments, it is recommended acceptance of the manuscript subject to corrections in the English. #Additional Questions: 1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this transaction?: Yes 2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Yes #Explain: 3. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Somewhat Novel 4. How would you rate the English usage? : Needs improvement 6. Rate the references: Satisfactory |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
可靠消息，8月21号(明天)放榜
已经有10人回复
-
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有20人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有125人回复
-
今天基金会出结果吗？20260819
已经有15人回复
-
时间戳变了，能看出什么问题？
已经有16人回复
-
filecode，4个jtjc了
已经有13人回复
-
为什么余额宝的年化利率越来越低？主要原因有哪些？
已经有5人回复
-
今天放榜没戏了吧
已经有5人回复
-
今天放榜吗？
已经有15人回复
-
filecode=后面第一个是大写字母
已经有12人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 论文接收散金币 另外还有问题求教
已经有212人回复
- 求教胆酸甲酯与醋酐反应的问题！
已经有3人回复
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
840562644: 金币+20, ★★★★★最佳答案 2015-09-25 23:59:14
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
840562644: 金币+20, ★★★★★最佳答案 2015-09-25 23:59:14
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2015-09-22 23:38:02
840562644
铁虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1288.4
- 散金: 70
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 159
- 在线: 39.6小时
- 虫号: 3157828
- 注册: 2014-04-23
- 专业: 信号理论与信号处理
3楼2015-09-23 11:01:20
840562644
铁虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1288.4
- 散金: 70
- 红花: 3
- 帖子: 159
- 在线: 39.6小时
- 虫号: 3157828
- 注册: 2014-04-23
- 专业: 信号理论与信号处理
4楼2015-09-23 11:17:05
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
5楼2015-09-24 00:38:32
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
6楼2015-09-24 00:40:24
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
7楼2015-09-24 01:47:32
|
请问投稿SPL，然后编辑部直接immediate reject ,说是Too much text and material is taken directly from other works，请问这是说抄袭么？还是重复率太高？还有机会修改后再投么？另外，请问一下论文查重可以使用这个么？https://www.turnitin.com.cn/ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
8楼2016-08-16 22:13:11
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
9楼2016-08-16 22:27:46
