24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1302  |  回复: 2
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zjujungle

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] ISA transactions会被镇压吗已有1人参与

ISA transactions这个期刊会被镇压吗,自引率已经40%以上了,最近几年,影响因子从1左右直升到2.9,觉得这个期刊对口,速度也可以,但是不敢投
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

月下行云

新虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
楼主你好,我长期在这个期刊投稿和审稿,确实没有遇到过要求自引的情况。 IEEE TIE和TIM以前有这个要求,现在也没有了。  我窃以为目前的审稿强度和把关力度,ISA的水平虽然不及Journal of process control. 但是应该也相距正在缩小。 上述为个人意见。
JPC虽然好,目前审稿确实太慢了。 有时有些创新性比较好急着发出来与读者见面的稿子,就直接投ISA来争取快一点在线发表了。正式发表也不快。  
你问的问题,我直接和主编沟通了。他的回复如下:也给其他虫友分享下。
Dear Dr. **,
Thanks for your email. I suggest that the 2014 rate of self-citation was a coincidence. In 2014, we had two special issues and the average number of published papers were much higher than previous years.
I hope that you continue your association with the journal as an author and a reviewer.

Sincerely,
Ahmad Rad
Editor-in-Chief
ISA Transactions - the Journal of Automation



At 08:39 PM 9/5/2015, you wrote:
Dear Prof. Rad,
          As a long-time reader and author of ISA Trans, I reallly appreciate the high quality of the papers and the editorials' hard work on organizing the issues.
However, I found that recently the journal's selfciting rate has reached 44% in 2014. It must be a coincidence but it may lead to some misunderstandings from other readers and Thomson Reuters, who may decide to supress the impact factor because of the high self-citation rate. In 2015, many good journals, e.g. IEEE Trans on Industrial informatics, has been dropped because of the high self-citing rate.
If so, it will definitely harm the long-time good reputation of ISA transactions.
Thus, I think it may be necessary for the editors to remind the authors to remove unnecessary citations to the ISA papers published in 2013 and 2014.
By doing so, the self-citation rate may be reduced in 2015's impact factor, which will be announced in 2016.
Regards
**
2楼2015-09-07 04:27:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zjujungle 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 国基资助率最新消息 +14 lhz_smu 2024-07-26 15/750 2024-07-27 07:48 by csyky2007
[基金申请] 对会评和中标过程讲得最清楚的一份材料 +7 hneyxiong 2024-07-26 7/350 2024-07-27 07:38 by nandi2212
[基金申请] 今年国家社科基金会评开始了吗?大概什么时候会评结束呢? +4 redfish105 2024-07-22 6/300 2024-07-27 01:35 by 里欧易达
[基金申请] 中标率那么低,重点实验室都不够分,三无老师直接躺平算了 +29 3115321 2024-07-25 46/2300 2024-07-26 22:11 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 实验设计是一种普遍的套路,那么区分本子高下的因素有哪些? +3 lifei00987 2024-07-25 6/300 2024-07-26 22:00 by lifei00987
[基金申请] 收到了科研之友 +33 朋友别哭010 2024-07-23 43/2150 2024-07-26 20:50 by 3115321
[基金申请] H口会评已经结束了 +16 小胖子罗军 2024-07-25 18/900 2024-07-26 19:40 by licheng78
[基金申请] 青年基金额度 +6 prisonrabbit 2024-07-26 7/350 2024-07-26 19:01 by 小狮子2010
[基金申请] 南京大学孙倍成、东南大学赵远锦, 两杰青打招呼被科技部处理 +34 babu2015 2024-07-20 39/1950 2024-07-26 18:58 by llhljsy
[基金申请] 收到L***这个邮件,是不是代表中了? +33 chat1234 2024-07-24 36/1800 2024-07-26 16:42 by crystalboy78
[基金申请] 据说今年4A1C成绩好于3A2B +6 chenwenqnig 2024-07-25 12/600 2024-07-26 06:41 by wangting_nju
[基金申请] 没中,也不是坏事儿 +21 majunge000 2024-07-22 48/2400 2024-07-25 22:10 by nandi2212
[基金申请] 为什么基金申请不改成双盲 +32 zxj199406 2024-07-23 34/1700 2024-07-25 16:10 by zhangwzh
[基金申请] 什么时候放榜? +4 lingchu 2024-07-23 4/200 2024-07-25 14:08 by 107967594
[基金申请] 严重怀疑 +12 球经不懂 2024-07-23 14/700 2024-07-25 09:18 by 杨虎
[论文投稿] 爱思唯尔杂志二审进入under review,没有发track网址,原网址也无track信息。 5+3 hdzw9071 2024-07-23 6/300 2024-07-24 20:58 by AdrianYuan
[基金申请] 给大家一点点信心 +12 cmrandy 2024-07-22 13/650 2024-07-23 15:08 by THK1912
[有机交流] 有会看核磁0-2ppm杂峰的大佬吗?! +6 Roderd 2024-07-21 6/300 2024-07-22 12:45 by wyx2022
[基金申请] 信息口F面上会评结束了,是不是也是必须4a才有戏? +7 哈雷摩托V 2024-07-21 12/600 2024-07-22 10:01 by 北山有猪
[基金申请] 三无博士的尴尬人生 +11 mariahcarey 2024-07-20 17/850 2024-07-22 09:05 by fanxi
信息提示
请填处理意见