24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1395  |  回复: 2

zjujungle

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] ISA transactions会被镇压吗已有1人参与

ISA transactions这个期刊会被镇压吗,自引率已经40%以上了,最近几年,影响因子从1左右直升到2.9,觉得这个期刊对口,速度也可以,但是不敢投
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

月下行云

新虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
楼主你好,我长期在这个期刊投稿和审稿,确实没有遇到过要求自引的情况。 IEEE TIE和TIM以前有这个要求,现在也没有了。  我窃以为目前的审稿强度和把关力度,ISA的水平虽然不及Journal of process control. 但是应该也相距正在缩小。 上述为个人意见。
JPC虽然好,目前审稿确实太慢了。 有时有些创新性比较好急着发出来与读者见面的稿子,就直接投ISA来争取快一点在线发表了。正式发表也不快。  
你问的问题,我直接和主编沟通了。他的回复如下:也给其他虫友分享下。
Dear Dr. **,
Thanks for your email. I suggest that the 2014 rate of self-citation was a coincidence. In 2014, we had two special issues and the average number of published papers were much higher than previous years.
I hope that you continue your association with the journal as an author and a reviewer.

Sincerely,
Ahmad Rad
Editor-in-Chief
ISA Transactions - the Journal of Automation



At 08:39 PM 9/5/2015, you wrote:
Dear Prof. Rad,
          As a long-time reader and author of ISA Trans, I reallly appreciate the high quality of the papers and the editorials' hard work on organizing the issues.
However, I found that recently the journal's selfciting rate has reached 44% in 2014. It must be a coincidence but it may lead to some misunderstandings from other readers and Thomson Reuters, who may decide to supress the impact factor because of the high self-citation rate. In 2015, many good journals, e.g. IEEE Trans on Industrial informatics, has been dropped because of the high self-citing rate.
If so, it will definitely harm the long-time good reputation of ISA transactions.
Thus, I think it may be necessary for the editors to remind the authors to remove unnecessary citations to the ISA papers published in 2013 and 2014.
By doing so, the self-citation rate may be reduced in 2015's impact factor, which will be announced in 2016.
Regards
**
2楼2015-09-07 04:27:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zjujungle

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 月下行云 at 2015-09-07 04:27:33
楼主你好,我长期在这个期刊投稿和审稿,确实没有遇到过要求自引的情况。 IEEE TIE和TIM以前有这个要求,现在也没有了。  我窃以为目前的审稿强度和把关力度,ISA的水平虽然不及Journal of process control. 但是应 ...

非常感谢!JPC确实太慢了!
3楼2015-11-13 11:05:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zjujungle 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见