24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 8859  |  回复: 27

Master-Fandy

铜虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 论文大修后,投稿状态从with editor直接变成decision in process,神马情况……已有23人参与

各位虫友,大家好!
小妹前段时间投了一篇论文,一个多月收到一审意见——大修,大概花了两个星期的时间,该补的理论实验也补充了,个人感觉整体上满足了审稿人的要求。9月1日返修回去,当天状态就变成with editor,3天后状态直接变成decision in process,好像没有经过under review过程。麻烦各位虫友们,帮忙分析一下具体情况和原因,自己都莫名的恐慌和紧张……目前还没收到任何结果。

另附审稿意见如下:
Reviewer #1: Ursolic acid(UA), the derivative of oleanolic acid, is widely studied due to numerous pharmacological activities. The author had synthesized a series of ursolic acid derivatives, which is a break ground result. In this paper, simulation approach is employed to explore the effects of binding affinity for inhibitory activities, which is an innovative work for the study on anti-diabetic properties of the hydrolyzation analogues of UA.
While, in order to verify that simulation model can explain the experimental results, some work needs to be complemented
Major Issues:
1. In the section of “structure activity relationship”
The author had got the value of IC50 by experiments, and calculated the binding energy to understand the relationship between binding mode and bioactivity. While Quantitative Structure-Activity and Relationships (QSAR) is the only persuasive tool to explain which structures play the important role in enhancing the inhibition activity.
In order to increase the confidence level of simulation results, the author has to demonstrate the QSAR equations to support their conclusions. The math expression of QSAR equation can be obtained by regression analysis. Only after the regression analysis work is completed, we can know which site in UA plays the important role for inhibition activity.
2. In the section of “molecular docking mode”, the author only listed the calculation results, but no parameter settings. The author has to list the major parameters, such as which kind of force field, which algorithm were used
Minor Issues:
3. Typo: In Figure 1. 3a - 8a & 3b – 8b should be replaced by 3a - 10a & 3b – 10b
4. Use idiomatic English expression:
Line 1: November 14 ---> November 14th;
Line 29: Expose
5. Some abbreviate needs full name, such as: Line 92: DMSO

Reviewer #2: This manuscript reports the synthesis and evaluation of a group of ursolic acid derivatives for anti-diabetic applications. The authors presented in vitro anti-diabetic activity and modeling studies to demonstrate their structure-bioactivity relationships, which would be useful for developing more effective alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. The manuscript is also well-written. I would recommend an acceptance in PLOS One after minor revisions.
1. The authors need to discuss what are the rationals of the overall molecular structure design and what are the objectives and hypotheses between each group analysis for molecules of interest.
2. It would be helpful if the authors can briefly discuss about the control (Acarbose) selection, since there are so many available inhibitors out there.
3. In the caption of Fig. 4, "liphilic" should be "Lipophilic". The authors need to carefully check over the manuscript to avoid typos.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

身体是革命的本钱,拼搏是永恒的主题!
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

sunnyboy555

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
正常,应该是编辑直接做决定了,我上一篇也是这样,很快Accept

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
2楼2015-09-04 22:16:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

幸福の味道

新虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
应该是无需返给审稿人,编辑直接决定。中的机会很大,提前恭喜你啦

[ 发自手机版 https://muchong.com/3g ]
3楼2015-09-04 22:25:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Master-Fandy

铜虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
8楼: Originally posted by zhanghao0320 at 2015-09-05 03:46:20
看意见没什么大问题,应该是编辑要直接决定accept了,现在很多期刊大修后也给直接accept

谢谢回复,文章已接收!大修后编辑直接决定了……
身体是革命的本钱,拼搏是永恒的主题!
9楼2015-09-08 00:56:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

cjinfor

铁杆木虫 (文坛精英)

应该马上要接受

[ 发自手机版 https://muchong.com/3g ]
4楼2015-09-04 22:29:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Master-Fandy

铜虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by sunnyboy555 at 2015-09-04 22:16:21
正常,应该是编辑直接做决定了,我上一篇也是这样,很快Accept

感谢吉言,希望可以顺利吧!
身体是革命的本钱,拼搏是永恒的主题!
5楼2015-09-05 00:11:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Master-Fandy

铜虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by 幸福の味道 at 2015-09-04 22:25:27
应该是无需返给审稿人,编辑直接决定。中的机会很大,提前恭喜你啦

只是一审给的意见是大修,感觉应该是要送审的!
身体是革命的本钱,拼搏是永恒的主题!
6楼2015-09-05 00:12:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Master-Fandy

铜虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by cjinfor at 2015-09-04 22:29:33
应该马上要接受

要是能接收当然更好了,也不知道decision in process要多久才能有决定。
身体是革命的本钱,拼搏是永恒的主题!
7楼2015-09-05 00:13:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhanghao0320

铜虫 (小有名气)

小硕


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
看意见没什么大问题,应该是编辑要直接决定accept了,现在很多期刊大修后也给直接accept
yearning
8楼2015-09-05 03:46:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

切尔西边锋

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by Master-Fandy at 2015-09-08 00:56:22
谢谢回复,文章已接收!大修后编辑直接决定了……...

恭喜啊,我的也刚刚大修返回

[ 发自手机版 https://muchong.com/3g ]
10楼2015-09-08 06:07:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 Master-Fandy 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见