| 查看: 611 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 本帖产生 1 个 翻译EPI ,点击这里进行查看 | ||
[求助]
简化一个长句子
|
||
| 这个句子(The decrease of the C=C stretching vibration frequency for polyene of increased the conjugation length has been explained by assuming that, with the increase of the conjugation length, the π-electrons delocalization tends to equalize the CC bond lengths, thereby decreasing the bond order of C=C bonds and causing a lower C=C stretching frequency for longer polyene.)比较长,请高手帮忙简化成简单明了的一两句。 |
» 猜你喜欢
最近几年招的学生写论文不引自己组发的文章
已经有6人回复
职称评审没过,求安慰
已经有56人回复
26申博自荐
已经有3人回复
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
ken81720711
木虫 (正式写手)
- 翻译EPI: 1
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3464.7
- 散金: 58
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 639
- 在线: 88.4小时
- 虫号: 3947758
- 注册: 2015-06-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生物无机化学
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
ouyangshunli: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助, 谢谢您的帮助! 2015-08-08 22:41:59
ouyangshunli: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助, 谢谢您的帮助! 2015-08-08 22:41:59
|
Associating with the increase of the conjugation length, the π-electrons delocalization tends to equalize the CC bond lengths. In this case, the bond order of C=C bonds might decrease,and hence a lower C=C stretching frequency for longer conjugation length of polyene would occur. [ 发自小木虫客户端 ] |

2楼2015-08-07 00:56:51
ken81720711
木虫 (正式写手)
- 翻译EPI: 1
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3464.7
- 散金: 58
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 639
- 在线: 88.4小时
- 虫号: 3947758
- 注册: 2015-06-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生物无机化学

3楼2015-08-07 01:04:14
武汉一心一译
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
- 翻译EPI: 502
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2283.1
- 散金: 5914
- 红花: 32
- 帖子: 1665
- 在线: 321.9小时
- 虫号: 3587652
- 注册: 2014-12-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子合成化学
【答案】应助回帖
商家已经主动声明此回帖可能含有宣传内容
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
ouyangshunli: 金币+15, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★★★最佳答案 2015-08-08 22:41:17
ouyangshunli: 金币+15, 翻译EPI+1, ★★★★★最佳答案 2015-08-08 22:41:17
| The C=C stretching vibration frequency is decreased by the increased conjugation length of polyene, because with the increase of the conjugation length, the π-electrons delocalization tends to equalize the CC bond lengths, for instance decreasing the bond order of C=C bonds, thus resulting in a lowered lower C=C stretching frequency for longer polyene. |
4楼2015-08-07 10:16:23













回复此楼