24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 6185  |  回复: 48
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

claire乐莜

铜虫 (小有名气)

[求助] SCI文章悲剧了。。 已有7人参与

三个审稿人,一个小修,一个大修,还有一个拒稿。其中拒稿的原因如下:
The manuscript deals with an interesting research topic. However, there are important reasons for recommending the rejection of the manuscript.

The introduction section is excessively long. It does not justify the novelty and the contribution to the field of the research performed. The objectives are not stated clearly.

The experimental design is not appropriated. The experiments were not repeated. Therefore, the results showed in the manuscript are not statistically significant.
最后一点这个拒稿意见是什么意思?实验重复了吗?编辑意见还挺有好的,说可以修改后重投,想搞清楚这个审稿人拒稿的原因。。请大神帮忙看一下吧
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

武汉一心一译

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)


【答案】应助回帖

商家已经主动声明此回帖可能含有宣传内容
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
The manuscript deals with an interesting research topic. However, there are important reasons for recommending the rejection of the manuscript.
研究的课题比较有趣,但是真的不能录用啊,文章有致命伤( important reasons )

The introduction section is excessively long. It does not justify the novelty and the contribution to the field of the research performed. The objectives are not stated clearly.
简介部分太长了,且文章的意义没有足够说明和和眼睛内容也不够新颖。关键是,实验对象真的没有标书清楚啊

The experimental design is not appropriated. The experiments were not repeated. Therefore, the results showed in the manuscript are not statistically significant.
实验设计不太好。而且文中实验的重复性不够,因为实验结果也没有统计学意义。

如果是语言方面的问题,我们公司能帮您解决
14楼2015-07-13 15:59:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

武汉一心一译

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)


商家已经主动声明此回帖可能含有宣传内容
引用回帖:
39脗楼: Originally posted by LIN脩卯 at 2015-07-14 12:17:57
脮芒脢脟路颅脪毛拢卢禄煤脝梅路颅碌脛赂脨戮玫
...

禄煤脝梅路颅脪毛驴脡脪脭掳脩important reason 路颅脪毛鲁脡隆庐脰脗脙眉脡脣"拢驴
40楼2015-07-14 12:22:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 claire乐莜 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见