24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2152  |  回复: 3
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者lqjsunny将赠送您 12 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lqjsunny

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 投过Biosensors and bioelectronics的各位大神麻烦帮忙看下审稿意见 已有1人参与

前些日子投稿Biosensors and bioelectronics,现在审稿意见回来了,三个审稿人,其中前两个给的是评价很高,说论文的创新性很高,然后提了些改进的问题,第三个审稿人直接给据了,然后乱提了一些意见,最后编辑给的是要大修。那我认真修改后接受的可能性大吗?其中编辑给的意见我有点不是和明白
Editors' report:

Please take the point(s) with "X" below into consideration when revising your manuscript.

1. Review Articles should present a thorough and comprehensive overview of the chosen subject and be extensively referenced and comprise around 8000 words. Authors are expected to go beyond a simple compilation of references and analyse trends, shortcomings and accomplishments in their chosen field, charting possible future directions of the research. Illustrations and summary tables are encouraged. Flexibility of presentation is permitted, but authors are urged to arrange the subject matter clearly under the general headings of Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Main text (The heading and the sub-headings of the main text are left to author's discretion), Summary and Conclusions, Future Perspectives, Acknowledgements, References.

x 2. Full papers should be complete descriptions of full investigations comprising around 5000 words with up to 6 single figures/tables/schemes in total, but your manuscript comprises too many figures/tables/schemes. You could use the supplemental information feature for extra figures/tables/schemes. Supplementary files supplied will be published online alongside the electronic version of your article in Elsevier Science web products, but will not appear in the printed issue. You can find the details at https://ees.elsevier.com/bios/

3. We would consider your revised manuscript for publication as a Short Communication. It should be complete descriptions of original limited investigations comprising around 3000 words with up to three single figures/tables/schemes. Alternatively, you could use the supplemental information feature for extra figures/tables/schemes. Supplementary files supplied will be published online alongside the electronic version of your article in Elsevier Science web products, but will not appear in the printed issue. You can find the details at https://ees.elsevier.com/bios/

4. Most referees still prefer to read hard copy when they review your manuscript. In order to aid referees in printing you are strongly recommended to make your manuscript text compact and to check that it will print out in a convenient format.
这里就第二条前面有x ,但是第三条说是建议以Short Communication的形式发表,那我是这些所有的意见都修改还是只考虑带x的第二条?纠结中,要不要改成Short Communication,恳请各位遇到过这种情况的大神给出宝贵建议啊!!!
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

往之不忘 BB editor report

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lqjsunny

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 09mzone at 2015-07-11 09:58:09
编辑的意见里面有x的要回答,其余选择性回答,祝福楼主!

那么还需要把文章修改成short communication形式吗???谢谢
3楼2015-07-11 16:28:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 4 个回答

09mzone

铁杆木虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
lqjsunny: 金币+3, 有帮助 2015-07-11 16:28:31
编辑的意见里面有x的要回答,其余选择性回答,祝福楼主!

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
strive for excellent!
2楼2015-07-11 09:58:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

09mzone

铁杆木虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by lqjsunny at 2015-07-11 16:28:14
那么还需要把文章修改成short communication形式吗???谢谢...

不用,估计第二条被标注是因为你的文章中图太多或者文字太多,编辑建议你把文章中的部分内容移动到supporting information里面

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
strive for excellent!
4楼2015-07-11 18:15:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见