24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2852  |  回复: 3
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者lqjsunny将赠送您 12 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lqjsunny

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 投过Biosensors and bioelectronics的各位大神麻烦帮忙看下审稿意见 已有1人参与

前些日子投稿Biosensors and bioelectronics,现在审稿意见回来了,三个审稿人,其中前两个给的是评价很高,说论文的创新性很高,然后提了些改进的问题,第三个审稿人直接给据了,然后乱提了一些意见,最后编辑给的是要大修。那我认真修改后接受的可能性大吗?其中编辑给的意见我有点不是和明白
Editors' report:

Please take the point(s) with "X" below into consideration when revising your manuscript.

1. Review Articles should present a thorough and comprehensive overview of the chosen subject and be extensively referenced and comprise around 8000 words. Authors are expected to go beyond a simple compilation of references and analyse trends, shortcomings and accomplishments in their chosen field, charting possible future directions of the research. Illustrations and summary tables are encouraged. Flexibility of presentation is permitted, but authors are urged to arrange the subject matter clearly under the general headings of Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Main text (The heading and the sub-headings of the main text are left to author's discretion), Summary and Conclusions, Future Perspectives, Acknowledgements, References.

x 2. Full papers should be complete descriptions of full investigations comprising around 5000 words with up to 6 single figures/tables/schemes in total, but your manuscript comprises too many figures/tables/schemes. You could use the supplemental information feature for extra figures/tables/schemes. Supplementary files supplied will be published online alongside the electronic version of your article in Elsevier Science web products, but will not appear in the printed issue. You can find the details at https://ees.elsevier.com/bios/

3. We would consider your revised manuscript for publication as a Short Communication. It should be complete descriptions of original limited investigations comprising around 3000 words with up to three single figures/tables/schemes. Alternatively, you could use the supplemental information feature for extra figures/tables/schemes. Supplementary files supplied will be published online alongside the electronic version of your article in Elsevier Science web products, but will not appear in the printed issue. You can find the details at https://ees.elsevier.com/bios/

4. Most referees still prefer to read hard copy when they review your manuscript. In order to aid referees in printing you are strongly recommended to make your manuscript text compact and to check that it will print out in a convenient format.
这里就第二条前面有x ,但是第三条说是建议以Short Communication的形式发表,那我是这些所有的意见都修改还是只考虑带x的第二条?纠结中,要不要改成Short Communication,恳请各位遇到过这种情况的大神给出宝贵建议啊!!!
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

往之不忘 BB editor report

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lqjsunny

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 09mzone at 2015-07-11 09:58:09
编辑的意见里面有x的要回答,其余选择性回答,祝福楼主!

那么还需要把文章修改成short communication形式吗???谢谢
3楼2015-07-11 16:28:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 4 个回答

09mzone

铁杆木虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
lqjsunny: 金币+3, 有帮助 2015-07-11 16:28:31
编辑的意见里面有x的要回答,其余选择性回答,祝福楼主!

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
strive for excellent!
2楼2015-07-11 09:58:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

09mzone

铁杆木虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by lqjsunny at 2015-07-11 16:28:14
那么还需要把文章修改成short communication形式吗???谢谢...

不用,估计第二条被标注是因为你的文章中图太多或者文字太多,编辑建议你把文章中的部分内容移动到supporting information里面

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
strive for excellent!
4楼2015-07-11 18:15:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 静等基金结果 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-10 21/1050 2026-08-13 17:56 by 且听虎啸
[文学芳草园] 阿姨 +3 汪汪锅 2026-08-09 3/150 2026-08-13 16:56 by 410610288
[基金申请] filecode +14 documentary 2026-08-10 16/800 2026-08-13 16:39 by 润生71
[基金申请] 重要来源:本周末出结果 +10 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-12 10/500 2026-08-13 15:46 by likettle
[基金申请] 咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否 +3 启萌科技 2026-08-12 6/300 2026-08-13 15:34 by 高飞的梦想
[基金申请] 不应该看fileCode +7 且听虎啸 2026-08-12 9/450 2026-08-13 14:27 by flydreamws
[基金申请] 我的国基提前知道中了,可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了,怎么会有这样的人 +9 家与远方 2026-08-10 14/700 2026-08-13 09:41 by 臭臭不臭01
[基金申请] 结合人工智能,周易传统文化,filecode打分制来了,3分以上希望很大。 +3 Tide man 2026-08-12 4/200 2026-08-13 08:35 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 好奇怪的filecode +5 布布和一二 2026-08-08 6/300 2026-08-12 16:11 by 云上清扬
[论文投稿] 职称评审,求友友推荐见刊最快的期刊 +4 工厂打螺丝 2026-08-08 4/200 2026-08-12 09:18 by hansi2025
[基金申请] 帮忙看看fileCode +7 wwncly 2026-08-10 13/650 2026-08-11 19:36 by 冰心玉壶晴
[基金申请] 为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果 +6 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-11 19:25 by Tide man
[硕博家园] 读博的好处 +3 lnee 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 18:10 by 希望我好好的
[基金申请] 确定了,国自然21号放榜 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-10 7/350 2026-08-10 19:15 by 2000zf36392
[基金申请] 国自然结果 +4 Vierhys 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 15:06 by Vierhys
[基金申请] 据悉今年马上要出结果了 +7 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-10 8/400 2026-08-10 12:42 by Vivilian
[基金申请] fileCode有新解读? +10 Tide man 2026-08-08 18/900 2026-08-09 12:55 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] 关于filecode,很负责任的告诉大家 +6 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-08 7/350 2026-08-08 22:13 by a_niu
[基金申请] 关于filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-07 22:55 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] 固定端突然变了,今天 +6 archvillain 2026-08-06 10/500 2026-08-07 16:03 by 医学老男孩
信息提示
请填处理意见